Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Co-firing carbon dioxide-torrefied woody biomass with coal on emission characteristics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Torrefaction is a pre-treatment technique that involves the partial pyrolysis (200–300 °C) of biomass in an inert environment to improve its fuel properties. Effect of co-firing CO2-torrefied mesquite and juniper (10 % on mass basis) with coal in a 30-kWt downfired burner was studied considering the grindability potential of CO2-torrefied biomass (60 % higher grindability than N2-torrefied biomass). It was observed that co-firing 10 % by mass of raw mesquite with coal reduced the NO x emission from 420 to 280 ppm (33 % reduction) for an equivalence ratio (ER) of 0.9. However, co-firing TB with coal reduced the NO x emission by 10 % when compared to base case NO x emission from combustion of pure powder river basin coal (PRB) coal. Carbon monoxide percentage in the flue gas increased when biomass was co-fired with coal. An inverse relation was observed between CO and NO x emissions due to NO x reducing potential of CO in the presence of fixed carbon. Combining the advantages of using a greenhouse gas CO2 for pre-treatment and potential of CO2-torrefied biomass in reducing emissions with improved grindability, proves co-firing torrefied biomass with coal is an efficient technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A/F :

Air-to-fuel ratio

BTU:

British thermal unit

C:

Carbon

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

CO:

Carbon monoxide

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

c p :

Specific heat at constant pressure

DAF:

Dry ash free

ER:

Equivalence ratio

FC:

Fixed carbon

GWP:

Global warming potential

H:

Hydrogen

H/C:

Ratio of hydrogen to carbon

HCN:

Hydrogen cyanide

HEX:

Heat exchanger

HHV:

Higher heating value

kJ/kg:

Kilojoule per kilogram

kW:

Kilowatt

kWt :

Kilowatt thermal

LPM:

Liters per minute

MJ:

Megajoule

MWe :

Megawatt electrical

N:

Nitrogen

NH3 :

Ammonia

NO x :

Nitrogen oxides

O:

Oxygen

O/C:

Ratio of oxygen to carbon

ppm:

Parts per million

PRB:

Powder river basin coal

RJ:

Raw juniper

RM:

Raw mesquite

RQ:

Respiratory quotient

S:

Sulfur

SCFM:

Standard cubic feet per minute

SLPM:

Standard liters per minute

SMD:

Sauter mean diameter

SO x :

Sulfur oxides

SR:

Stoichiometric ratio

TJ:

Torrefied juniper

TM:

Torrefied mesquite

VM:

Volatile matter

W:

Watt

X i :

Mole fraction of species i

\( {x}_{{\mathrm{O}}_2,\ \mathrm{flue}} \) :

Mole fraction of oxygen in the flue gas

\( {x}_{{\mathrm{O}}_2,\ \mathrm{a}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{b}} \) :

Mole fraction of oxygen in the ambient air

ϕ:

Equivalence ratio

References

  1. BP (2013) BP statistical review of world energy 2013: http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/statistical-review/statistical_review_of_world_energy_2013.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2013

  2. EIA (2013) EIA Total Energy data: http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/showtext.cfm?t=ptb0804a. Accessed 12 Aug 2013

  3. IEA (2013) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. International Energy Agency, France

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hus PJ, Tillman DA (2000) Cofiring multiple opportunity fuels with coal at bailly generating station. Biomass Bioenergy 19(6):385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Turn SQ, Jenkins BM, Jakeway LA, Blevins LG, Williams RB, Rubenstein G, Kinoshita CM (2006) Test results from sugar cane bagasse and high fiber cane co-fired with fossil fuels. Biomass Bioenergy 30(6):565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Damstedt B, Pederson JM, Hansen D, Knighton T, Jones J, Christensen C, Baxter L, Tree D (2007) Biomass cofiring impacts on flame structure and emissions. Proc Combust Inst 31(2):2813–2820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence B, Annamalai K, Sweeten JM, Heflin K (2009) Cofiring coal and dairy biomass in a 29 kWt furnace. Appl Energy 86(11):2359–2372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arumugam S, Thien B, Annamalai K, Sweeten J (2005) Feedlot biomass co-firing: a renewable energy alternative for coal-fired utilities. Int J Green Energy 2(4):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gogebakan Z, Selçuk N (2008) Cofiring lignite with hazelnut shell and cotton residue in a pilot-scale fluidized bed combustor. Energy Fuel 22(3):1620–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tillman DA (2000) Biomass cofiring: the technology, the experience, the combustion consequences. Biomass Bioenergy 19(6):365–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sami M, Annamalai K, Wooldridge M (2001) Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends. Prog Energy Combust Sci 27(2):171–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Narayanan KV, Natarajan E (2007) Experimental studies on cofiring of coal and biomass blends in India. Renew Energy 32(15):2548–2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin Y, Lu L, Ma X, Liu H, Chi Y, Yoshikawa K (2013) Effects of blending hydrothermally treated municipal solid waste with coal on co-combustion characteristics in a lab-scale fluidized bed reactor. Appl Energy 102:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Savolainen K (2003) Co-firing of biomass in coal-fired utility boilers. Appl Energy 74(3):369–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daood SS, Javed MT, Gibbs BM, Nimmo W (2013) NO x control in coal combustion by combining biomass co-firing, oxygen enrichment and SNCR. Fuel 105:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brouwer JOW, Harding S, Heap MP, Pershing DW (1995) Cofiring waste biofuels and coal for emissions reduction. In: 2nd Biomass Conference of the Americas, Portland, pp 390–399

  17. Demirbaş A (2003) Sustainable cofiring of biomass with coal. Energy Convers Manag 44(9):1465–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Agar D, Wihersaari M (2012) Bio-coal, torrefied lignocellulosic resources—key properties for its use in co-firing with fossil coal—their status. Biomass Bioenergy 44:107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tran KQ, Luo X, Seisenbaeva G, Jirjis R (2013) Stump torrefaction for bioenergy application. Appl Energy 112:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eseltine D, Thanapal SS, Annamalai K, Ranjan D (2013) Torrefaction of woody biomass (Juniper and Mesquite) using inert and non-inert gases. Fuel 113:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thanapal SS, Chen W, Annamalai K, Carlin N, Ansley RJ, Ranjan D (2014) Carbon dioxide torrefaction of woody biomass. Energy Fuel. doi:10.1021/ef4022625

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lu KM, Lee WJ, Chen WH, Lin TC (2013) Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied wood and coal blends. Appl Energy 105:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones JM, Bridgeman TG, Darvell LI, Gudka B, Saddawi A, Williams A (2012) Combustion properties of torrefied willow compared with bituminous coals. Fuel Process Technol 101:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldfarb JL, Liu C (2013) Impact of blend ratio on the co-firing of a commercial torrefied biomass and coal via analysis of oxidation kinetics. Bioresour Technol 149:208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maciejewska A, Veringa H, Sanders J, Peteves SD (2006) Co-firing of biomass with coal: constraints and role of biomass pre-treatment. Institute for Energy, Petten

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li J, Brzdekiewicz A, Yang W, Blasiak W (2012) Co-firing based on biomass torrefaction in a pulverized coal boiler with aim of 100% fuel switching. Appl Energy 99:344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Biagini E, Yang W, Tognotti L, Blasiak W (2013) Flame characteristics of pulverized torrefied-biomass combusted with high-temperature air. Combust Flame 160(11):2585–2594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yani S, Gao X, Wu H (2015) Emission of Inorganic PM10 from the combustion of torrefied biomass under pulverized-fuel conditions. Energy Fuel 29:800–807

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Auken OW (2000) Shrub invasions of North American semiarid grasslands. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:197–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ansley RJ, Mirik M, Castellano MJ (2010) Structural biomass partitioning in regrowth and undisturbed mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa): implications for bioenergy uses. GCB Bioenergy 2:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Buhre BJP, Elliott LK, Sheng CD, Gupta RP, Wall TF (2005) Oxy-fuel combustion technology for coal-fired power generation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31(4):283–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lawn CJ (1987) Principles of combustion engineering for boilers. Academic Press

  33. Oh HJ (2008) Reburning renewable biomass for emissions control and ash deposition effects in power generation. Texas A&M University, College Station

  34. Annamalai K, Puri IK (2007) Combustion science and engineering, vol 7. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kline SJ, McClintock FA (1953) Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech Eng 75(1):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen W (2012) Fixed bed counter current low temperature gasification of mesquite and juniper biomass using air-steam as oxidizer. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thanapal SS (2014) Effect of co-firing torrefied woody biomass with coal in a 30 kWt downfired burner. Texas A&M University, College Station

  38. Annamalai K (2013) Respiratory quotient (Rq), exhaust gas analyses, CO2 emission and applications in automobile engineering. Adv Automob Eng 2, e116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Varol M, Atimtay AT, Olgun H, Atakül H (2014) Emission characteristics of co-combustion of a low calorie and high sulfur–lignite coal and woodchips in a circulating fluidized bed combustor: part 1. Effect of excess air ratio. Fuel 117:792–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Glarborg P, Jensen AD, Johnsson JE (2003) Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems. Prog Energy Combust Sci 29(2):89–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thien BF, Lawrence BD, Sweeten JM, Annamalai K (2012) Co-firing coal: poultry litter biomass blends in a laboratory scale boiler-burner. Trans ASABE 55(2):681–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mitchell JW, Tarbell JM (1982) A kinetic model of nitric oxide formation during pulverized coal combustion. AIChE J 28(2):302–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the help from Tiyawut Tiyawangsakul, Jason Caswell, and Dr Mirik Mustafa. The authors would like to thank the 2013 Texas A&M University-CONACYT: Collaborative Research Grant Program for financial support.

Consent and Ethical Statement

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript and its publication. The submitted manuscript is not in consideration in any other journal, and no data presented here are fabricated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Devesh Ranjan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thanapal, S.S., Annamalai, K., Ansley, R.J. et al. Co-firing carbon dioxide-torrefied woody biomass with coal on emission characteristics. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 6, 91–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0166-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-015-0166-6

Keywords

Navigation