Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transposing reform pedagogy into new contexts: complex instruction in remote Australia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article draws on the outcomes of a 4-year project where complex instruction was used as the basis for a reform in mathematics teaching in remote Aboriginal communities in Australia. The article describes the overall project in terms of the goals and aspirations for learning mathematics among remote Indigenous Australians. Knowing that the approach had been successful in a diverse setting in California, the project team sought to implement and evaluate the possibilities of such reform in a context in which the need for a culturally responsive pedagogy was critical. Elements of complex instruction offered considerable possibilities in aligning with the cultures of the remote communities, but with recognition of the possibility that some elements may not be workable in these contexts. Complex instruction also valued deep knowledge of mathematics rather than a tokenistic, impoverished mathematics. The strategies within complex instruction allowed for mathematical and cultural scaffolding to promote deep learning in mathematics. Such an approach was in line with current reforms in Indigenous education in Australia where there are high expectations of learners in order to break away from the deficit thinking that has permeated much education in remote Australia. The overall intent is to demonstrate what pedagogies are possible within the constraints of the remote context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This project was funded by the Australian Research Council through its Linkage Grants Scheme with the Association of Independent Schools Western Australia (AISWA) as the industry partner. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not of the funding agencies.

  2. Australia has introduced a national curriculum in 2012.

References

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). National assessment program LiIteracy and numeracy achievement in reading, writing, language conventions and numeracy. Melbourne: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: the case of Railside school. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Lotan, R. (Eds.). (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland. (2001). The Queensland school longitudinal reform study. Brisbane: GoPrint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigo, T., Corrigan, M., Adams, I., Hughes, C., Stephens, M., & Woods, D. (2003). Supporting English literacy and numeracy learning for indigenous students in the early years. ACER Monograph 57. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J., Griffiths, T., & Ladwig, J. G. (2004). Towards better teaching: productive pedagogy as a framework for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2007). Accelerating the literacy development of Indigenous students: The National Accelerated Literacy Program (NALP). Darwin: Charles Darwin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R., Grootenboer, P., & Niesche, R. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in teaching mathematics in remote Aboriginal schools. In R. Jorgensen, P. Sullivan, & P. Grootenboer (Eds.), Pedagogies to enhance learning for Indigenous students: Evidence-based practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B. (2004). Australian mathematics learning in an international context. In I. Putt (Ed.), The 27th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia: Mathematics Education for the Third Millennium: Towards 2010. Townsville: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, C. (2008). Death by a thousand cuts: Indigenous language bilingual education programmes in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1972–1998. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(2–3), 160–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarra, C. (2009). New narrative tells of brighter future together. The Australian newspaper, August 2008.

  • Sarra, C. (2012). Stronger Smarter Institute: Changing the tide of low expectations in Indigenous Education Retrieved 2/9/2012, 2012, from http://www.strongersmarter.qut.edu.au/.

  • Sullivan, P., & van Reil, N. (2013). Building confidence and fostering engagement in Aboriginal learners. In R. Jorgensen, P. Sullivan, & P. Grootenboer (Eds.), Pedagogies to enhance learning for Indigenous students. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Youdale, R., & Jorgensen, R. (2009). Knowing where you are going helps you know how to get there. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 14(4), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Sullivan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, P., Jorgensen, R., Boaler, J. et al. Transposing reform pedagogy into new contexts: complex instruction in remote Australia. Math Ed Res J 25, 173–184 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0069-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0069-4

Keywords

Navigation