Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aquifer Storage and Recovery of Treated Sewage Effluent in the Middle East

  • Research Article - Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treated sewage effluent (TSE) is becoming a critical resource in arid parts of the world. The high costs of desalinated potable water and the depletion of fresh groundwater resources necessitate increased use of TSE as an important component of water resource management throughout the Middle East. TSE can replace potable-quality water in irrigation, with the latter becoming too valuable a resource to use for irrigation purposes. In urban regions of the Middle East and North Africa, excess TSE is often available because of seasonal variations in demand and supply or that the development of reuse infrastructure has not kept pace with population growth, concomitant water use and TSE generation. Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) technology provides an opportunity to store large volumes of TSE for later beneficial use. Natural attenuation processes that occur during underground storage in an ASR system can also act to improve the quality of stored water and thus provide an opportunity to ‘polish’ already high-quality TSE. Aquifers containing brackish water or those depleted from over-pumping are present throughout much of the Middle East. These aquifers could potentially be used as storage zones for ASR systems. However, currently available hydrogeologic data are insufficient for assessment of potential system performance. Other key design issues are the selection of ASR system locations and storage zones so that TSE will not enter potable water supplies, and ensuring that the ASR systems will be readily integrated into existing or planned sewage treatment, TSE transmission and reuse infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pyne RDG (1995) Groundwater recharge and wells. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, p 376 pp

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bouwer H (1991) Groundwater recharge with sewage effluent. Water Sci Technol 23: 2099–2108

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maliva RG, Missimer TM (2008) ASR, useful storage, and the myth of residual pressure. Ground Water 46: 171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maliva RG, Guo W, Missimer TM (2006) Aquifer storage and recovery: recent hydrogeological advances and system performance. Water Environ Res 78: 2428–2435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shammas MI (2008) The effectiveness of artificial recharge in combating seawater intrusion in Salalah Coastal Aquifer, Oman. Environ Geol 55: 191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pyne RDG (2005) Aquifer storage recovery: a guide to groundwater recharge through wells. ASR Systems, Gainesville, FL, p 606 pp

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katzer T, Brothers K, Cole E, Donovan D, Johnson M (1998) A cost-benefit analysis of artificial recharge in the Las Vegas Valley Ground-Water System, Clark County, Nevada. Report prepared for the Southern Nevada Water Authority Ground Water Management Program, 38 pp

  8. Donovan DJ, Katzer T, Brothers K, Cole E, Johnson M (2002) Cost-benefit analysis of artificial recharge in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada. J Water Resour Plan Manag 128: 356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bloetscher F, Muniz A, Witt GM (2005) Groundwater injection: modeling risks and regulations. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 337

    Google Scholar 

  10. Senay Y (1977) Groundwater resources and artificial recharge in Rawdatain Water Field, Open File Report, Groundwater Section, Kuwait Ministry of Electricity and Water, 44 pp

  11. Missimer TM, Guo W, Walker CW, Maliva RG (2002) Hydraulic and density considerations in the design or aquifer storage and recovery systems. FL Water Resour J 55(2): 30–36

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vacher HL, Hutchings WC, Budd DA (2006) Metaphors and models: the ASR bubble in the Floridan aquifer. Ground Water 44: 144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Merritt ML (1985) Subsurface storage of freshwater in South Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2261, 43 pp

  14. Merritt ML (1986) Recovering fresh water stored in saline limestone aquifers. Ground Water 24: 516–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maliva RG, Guo W, Missimer TM (2005) Hydrogeology of aquifer storage and recovery system performance. Gulf Coast Assoc Geol Soc Trans 55: 474–485

    Google Scholar 

  16. Asano T, Cotruvo JA (2003) Groundwater recharge With reclaimed wastewater; Health and regulatory considerations. In: Aertgeerts R, Angelakis A (eds) Health risks in aquifer recharge using reclaimed water—state of the art report. World Health Organization, Report SPE/WSH/03/08, 171–179

  17. Markus MR (2009) Groundwater replenishment & water reuse, the water report, issue 59 (January 15, 2009), pp 1–9

  18. Groundwater Replenishment System (2007) Water Purification System http://www.gwrsystem.com

  19. Martin R, Clarke D, Dennis K, Graham J, Dillon P, Pavelic P and Barry K (2002) Bolivar Water Re-use Project. Department of Water, Land, and Biodiversity Conservation, Report DWLBC 2002/02, 22

  20. Johnson RD, Toy D, Pinkston J and Hanson RG (2007) ASR program key to water resources management. In: Fox P (ed) Management of aquifer recharge for sustainability. Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on managed Aquifer Recharge of Groundwater. Acacia Publishing, Phoenix, pp 379–388

  21. Maliva RG, Missimer TM, Griswold R (2009) Optimization of coastal water resources management. In: Proceedings International Desalination Society World Congress on desalination and water reuse, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, IDAWC/DB09-077, 13 pp

  22. Farooq S, Ansari ZI (1983) Wastewater reuse in muslim countries: an islamic perspective. Environ Manag 7: 119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Water Authority of Jordan, Religious Grounds, Water Authority of Jordan, Environment & Water Reuse Unit. (http://www.waj.gov.jo/English/reuse/religious_grounds.htm). Accessed 27 July 2009

  24. Al-Otaibi M, Mukhopadhyay A (2005) Options for managing water resources in Kuwait. Arab J Sci Eng 30: 55–68

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dillon PJ, Pavelic P, Toze S, Rinck-Pfeiffer S, Martin R, Knapton A, Pidsley D (2006) Role of aquifer storage in water reuse. Desalination 188: 123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dillon P, Toze S, Pavelic P, Vanderzalm J, Barry Y, Ying G-L, Kookana R, Skjemstad J, Nicholson B, Miller R, Correll R, Prommer H, Greskowiak J, Stuyfzand P (2006) Water quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery at ten sites, recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwater resources. Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on management of aquifer recharge, Berlin, Germany, 11–16 June 2005. UNESCO, Paris, pp 85–94

  27. Dillon P, Pavelic P, Toze S, Ragusa S, Wright M, Peter P, Martin R, Gerges N, Rinck-Pfieffer S (1999) Storing recycled water in an aquifer, benefits and risks. Aust Water Wastewater Assoc J 26: 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dillon P, Toze S (2005) Water quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery, vol 1: water auality improvement processes. AWWA Research Foundation Report 91056F, 286 pp

  29. Khan SJ, Rorije E (2002) Pharmaceutically active compounds in aquifer storage and recovery. In: Dillon PJ (eds) Management of aquifer recharge for sustainability. A.A. Balkema, Lisse, pp 169–174

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pyne RDG (2002) Aquifer storage recovery wells: the path ahead. FL Water Resour J February 19–27

  31. McQuarrie JP, Carlson K (2003) Secondary benefits of aquifer storage and recovery: disinfection by-product control. J Environ Eng 129: 412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pavelic P, Dillon P, Nicholson B (2005) Analysis of the fate of DBPs at eight ASR sites. In: Dillon P, Toze S (eds) Water quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery. vol 1: Water quality improvement processes, AWWA Research Foundation Report 91056F, pp 39–64

  33. Pavelic P, Dillon P, Nicholson BC (2008) Comparative evaluation of the fate of disinfection byproducts at eight aquifer storage and recovery sites. Environ Sci Technol 40: 501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vanderzalm J, Le Gal La Salle C (2005) Impacts of redox cycling on inorganic chemistry during ASR. In: Dillon P, Toze S (eds) Water quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery. Volume 1: water quality improvement processes, AWWA Research Foundation Report 91056F, pp 25–38

  35. Wall K, Toze S, O’Hara G (2006) Interactions of indigenous bacteria with enteric viruses during water quality improvement by aquifer storage and recovery (ASR). Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwater resources. Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on management of aquifer recharge, Berlin, Germany, 11–16 June 2005, UNESCO, Paris, pp 518–524

  36. Wall K, Toze S, O’Hara G (2007) Indigenous groundwater microorganism processes that influence the decay of enteric viruses. In: Fox P (ed) Management of aquifer recharge for sustainability: proceedings of the 6th international symposium on managed aquifer recharge of groundwater. Acacia Publishing, Phoenix, pp 246–256

  37. Stuyfzand PJ (2007) Behavior of pharmaceuticals and other emerging pollutants in various artificial recharge systems in the Netherlands. In: Fox P (ed) Management of aquifer recharge for sustainability: proceedings of the 6th international symposium on managed aquifer recharge of groundwater. Acacia Publishing, Phoenix, pp 231–245

  38. National Research Council (1994) Ground water recharge using waters of impaired quality. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 286 pp

  39. National Research Council (1998) Issues in potable reuse: the viability of augmenting drinking water supplies with reclaimed water. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 263 pp

  40. John DE, Rose JB, Kamarainen A (2004) Survival of fecal indicator bacteria, bacteriophage and protozoa in Florida’s surface and ground water: final report of the fate of microorganisms in aquifer study. Southwest Florida Water District and South Florida Water Management District, 240 pp

  41. John DE, Rose JB (2005) Review of factors affecting microbial survival in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 39: 7345–7356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Toze S (2005) Pathogen survival in groundwater: a review of the literature. In: Dillon P, Toze S (eds) Water quality improvements during aquier storage and recovery. vol 1: water quality improvement processes. AWWA Research Foundation Report 91056F, pp 123–140

  43. Nicholson BC, Dillon PJ, Pavelic P (2002) Fate of disinfection by-products during aquifer storage and recover. In: Dillon PJ (eds) Management of aquifer recharge for sustainability. A.A. Balkema, Lisse, pp 155–160

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nicholson B, Ying G-G (2005) Attenuation of disinfection by-products during aquifer storage and recovery. In: Dillon P, Toze Water S (eds) Quality improvements during aquifer storage and recovery. Volume 1: water quality improvement processes. AWWA Research Foundation Report 91056F, pp 39–64

  45. Bouwer EJ, Wright JP (1988) Transformations of trace aliphatics in anoxic biofilm columns. J Contam Hydrol 2: 155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Singer PC, Pyne RDG, Mallikarjum AVS, Miller CT, Majonnier C (1983) Examining the impact of aquifer storage and recovery on DBPs. J Am Water Works Assoc 85(11): 85–94

    Google Scholar 

  47. Landmeyer JE, Bradley PN, Thomas JM (2000) Biodegradation of disinfection byproducts as a potential removal process during aquifer storage recovery. J Am Water Resour Assoc 26: 861–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fram MS, Bergamaschi B, Goodwin KD, Fujii R, Clark JF (2003) Processes affecting the trihalomethane concentrations associated with the third injection, storage, and recovery test at Lancaster, Antelope Valley, California, March 1998 through April 1999. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4062, 72 pp

  49. Ongerth JE, Khan S (2005) Drug residuals: how xenobiotics can affect water supply sources. J Am Water Works Assoc 96(5): 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sedlak DL, Gray JL, Pinkston KE (2000) Understanding microcontaminants in recycled water. Environ Sci Technol 35: 508A–515A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Daughton C, Ternes T (1999) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents to subtle change?. Environ Health Perspect 107(Supplement 6): 907–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Drewes JE, Heberer T, Rauch T, Reddersen K (2003) Fate of pharmaceuticals during groundwater recharge. Ground Water Monit Remediat 23: 64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM, Llompart M, Garcia C, Rodriguez I, Gómez M, Ternes T (2004) Behaviour of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant. Water Res 38: 2918–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM (2005) Removal of cosmetic ingredients and pharmaceutical in sewage primary treatment. Water Res 39: 4790–4796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM, Llompart M, Garcia C, Rodriguez I, Gómez M, Ternes T (2005) Behaviour of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in a sewage treatment plant of northwest Spain. Water Sci Technol 52(8): 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  56. Clara M, Strenn B, Gans O, Martinez E, Kreuzinger N, Kroiss H (2005) Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 39: 4797–4807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Drewes JE, Heberer T, Reddersen K (2002) Fate of pharmaceuticals during indirect potable reuse. Water Sci Technol 46: 73–80

    Google Scholar 

  58. Heberer T, Mechlinski A, Franck B, Knappe A, Massmann G, Pekdeger A, Fritz B (2004). Field studies on the fate and transport of pharmaceutical residues in bank filtration. Ground Water Monit Remediat 24:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Snyder SA, Leising J, Westerkoff P, Young Y, Mash H, Vanderford B (2004) Biological and physical attenuation of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals: implications for water reuse. Ground Water Monit Remediat 24: 108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ying G-G, Kookana RS, Dillon P (2004) Attenuation of two estrogen compounds in aquifer materials supplemented with sewage effluent. Ground Water Monit Remediat 24: 102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zuehlke S, Duennbier U, Heberer T, Fritz B (2004) Analysis of endocrine disrupting steroids: investigations of their release into the environment and their behavior during bank filtration. Ground Water Monit Remediat 24: 78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bradley CC, Ali MY, Shwaky I, Levannier A, Dawoud MA (2007) Microgravity investigation of an aquifer storage and recovery site in Abu Dhabi. First Break 25: 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mukhopadhyay A (2002) Prospects of artificial recharge in Kuwait. In: Sherif MM, Singh VP, Al-Rahed M (eds) Groundwater hydrology, proceedings of the international conference of water resources in arid regions. Swetts & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 77–87

  64. Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Otaibi M (2002) Numerical simulation of freshwater storage in the Dammam Formation, Kuwait. Arab J Sci Eng 27: 127–150

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mukhopadhyay A, Székely F, Senay Y (1994) Artificial ground water recharge experiments in carbonate and clastic aquifers of Kuwait. Water Resour Bull 30: 1061–1107

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Sulaimi J, Al-Sumait AA (1998) Creation of potable water reserve in Kuwait through artificial recharge In: Peters JH et al (eds) Artificial recharge of groundwater. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 175–180

  67. Mukhopadhyay A, Al-Awadi E, Oskui R, Hadi K, Al-Rywaih F, Turner M, Akber A (2004) Laboratory investigations of compatibility of the Kuwait group aquifer, Kuwait, with possible injection waters. J Hydrol 285: 158–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Maliva RG, Clayton EA, Missimer TM (2009) Application of advanced borehole geophysical logging to managed aquifer recharge investigations. Hydrogeol J 17: 1547–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Schlumberger Water Services, 1567 Hayley Lane, Suite 202, Fort Myers, FL, 33907, USA

    Robert G. Maliva

  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Thomas M. Missimer

  3. Schlumberger Water Services, P.O. Box 301801, Al-Khozam Center, Office 204, Riyadh, 11372, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Frank P. Winslow

  4. Schlumberger Water Services, Hamdan Street, Masaood Tower, 6th Floor, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Rolf Herrmann

Authors
  1. Robert G. Maliva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas M. Missimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank P. Winslow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rolf Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Maliva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maliva, R.G., Missimer, T.M., Winslow, F.P. et al. Aquifer Storage and Recovery of Treated Sewage Effluent in the Middle East. Arab J Sci Eng 36, 63–74 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0011-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0011-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation