Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat selection and segregation by two sympatric lagomorphs: the case of European hares (Lepus europaeus) and Eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in northern Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In northern Italy, the native European hare (Lepus europaeus) and the introduced Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) can occur together at a local scale, as a result of cottontail introduction and expansion into the European hare range. Hare populations are limited in Italy by habitat loss, diseases, and most important by overhunting, and many areas within hare range in northern Italy are undergoing increasing anthropogenic impact. Therefore, quantitative studies on resource selection and exploitation by both species will be of great interest to evaluate the degree of habitat overlap and to search for exploitation competition evidences. We studied habitat selection during resting time by both species in two areas where they occur alone and in one area where they occur together. Habitat selection by the two species was examined at micro- and macro-habitat scales during autumn–winter and spring–summer. Both species selected ecotonal zones between arboriculture stands and crops and between arboriculture stands and spontaneous vegetation (i.e., herbaceous, bush, and woody permanent species), which were the less available in the area of sympatry. No habitat shifts were evident at macro-habitat level because the two species showed a differential micro-habitat use within patches. On the whole, it seems that habitat heterogeneity promoted daytime segregation between the two species. In particular, edges between crops and canopy habitats should be improved, thus reducing chance of intra- and inter-specific encounters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky Z (1981) Habitat relationships and competition in two Mediterranean Apodemus spp. Oikos 36:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Althoff DP, Storm GL, Dewalle DR (1997) Daytime habitat selection by cottontails in central Pennsylvania. J Wildl Manage 61:450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour MS, Litvaitis JA (1993) Niche dimensions of New England cottontails in relation to habitat patch size. Oecologica 95:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1984) Moose and snowshoe hare competition and a mechanistic explanation from foraging theory. Oecologica 61:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Macdonald DW (2004) Differential habitat use promotes sustainable coexistence between the specialist otter and the generalist mink. Oikos 106:509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Chanin P, Macdonald DW (2004) Competition between Eurasian otter Luta lutra and American mink Mustela vison probed by niche shift. Oikos 106:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonino N, Sbriller A, Manacorda MM, Larosa F (1997) Food partitioning between the mara (Dolichotius patagonum) and the introduced hare (Lepus europaeus) in the Monte Desert, Argentina. Stud Neotr Fauna Environ 32:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Laake JL (1985) Efficiency and bias in strip and line transect sampling. J Wildl Manage 49:1012–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler MJ, Ballard WB, Wallace MC, Demaso SJ (2007) Road-based survey for estimating wild turkey density in the Texas rolling plain. J Wildl Manage 71:1646–1653. doi:10.2193/2006-270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman JA, Harman AL, Samuel DE (1977) Reproductive and physiological cycles in cottontail complex in Western Maryland and nearby West Virginia. Wildl Monogr 56:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan D, Bell DJ (1986) Leporid social behaviour and social organization. Mamm Rev 16:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PM (1993) The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological indices. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 290–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Fa JA, Romero FJ, Paniagua LP (1992) Habitat use by parapatric rabbits in a Mexican high-altitude grassland system. J Anim Ecol 29:357–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P, Spears EE, Poole RW (1981) A simple measure of niche breath. Ecology 62:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen K (1992) Reproduction in European hare in a Danish farmland. Acta Theriol 37:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings N, Smith RK, Hacklander K, Harris S, White PCL (2006) Variation in demography, condition and dietary quality of hares Lepus europaeus from high-density and low-density populations. Wildl Biol 12:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katona K, Biro Z, Hahn I, Kertesz M, Altbacker V (2004) Competition between European hare and European rabbit in a lowland area, Hungary: a long-term ecology study in the period of rabbit extinction. Folia Zool 53:255–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Second Edition. Addison-Welsey Educational Publishers, Inc., Canada, pp 1-607

  • Langbein J, Hutchings MR, Harris S, Stoate C, Tapper SC, Wray S (1999) Techniques for assessing the abundance of Brown Hares Lepus europaeus. Mamm Rev 29:93–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankin PC, Warner RE (1999) Responses of Eastern cottontails to intensive row-crop farming. J Mammal 80:890–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (1993) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor R, Saltz D (2008) Conservation implications of competition between generalist and specialist rodents in Mediterranean afforested landscape. Biodivers Conserv 17:2513–2523. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9397-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A (1989) Analisi critica di alcuni metodi di censimento della fauna selvatica (Aves, Mammalia). Aspetti teorici ed applicativi Ricerche di Biologia della Selvaggina 83:1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Ferloni M, Geremia R (2001) Studio sul successo dei ripopolamenti di Lepre. Dipartimento di Biologia Animale, Università di Pavia, Pavia

  • Morris DW (1996) Coexistence of specialist and generalist rodents via habitat selection. Ecology 77:2352–2364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norusis MJ (1992) SPSS/PC+Base system user’s guide, Vers. 5.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago

  • Partridge L (1978) Habitat selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 351–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Pépin D, Angibault JM (2007) Selection of resting sites by the European hare as related to habitat characteristics during agricultural changes. Eur J Wildl Res 53:183–189. doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0087-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1981) Competition and niche theory. In: May RM (ed) Theoretical ecology. Principles and applications. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 167–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichlin T, Klansek E, Hacklander K (2006) Diet selection by hares (Lepus europaeus) in arable land and its implications for habitat management. Eur J Wildl Res 52:109–118. doi:10.1007/s10344-005-0013-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz F, Leonard Y (1994) Characteristics of European hare Lepus europaeus use of space in a French agricultural region of intensive farming. Acta Theriol 39:143–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Roedenbeck P, Voser P (2008) Effects of roads on spatial distribution, abundance and mortality of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Switzerland. Eur J Wildl Res 54:425–437. doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0166-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecol 62:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1991) Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. Am Nat 137:S5–S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santilli F, Galardi L (2006) Factors affecting Brown hare (Lepus europaeus) hunting bags in Tuscany region (central Italy). Hystrix 17:143–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner KT, Warren RJ (1990) Seasonal demography and movements of cottontail rabbits on isolated Playa Basins. J Wildl Manage 54:403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AC, Koper N, Francis CM, Fahrig L (2009) Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 29:1271–1285. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9383-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DF, Litvaitis JA (2000) Foraging strategies of sympatric lagomorphs: implications for differential success in fragmented landscapes. Can J Zool 78:2134–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RK, Jennings NV, Harris S (2005) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mamm Rev 35:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swihart KR (1986) Home range-body mass allometry in rabbits and hares (Leporidae). Acta Theriol 31:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Yahner RH (1982) Habitat features influencing use of farmstead shelterbelts by eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus). Am Midl Nat 107:411–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Yahner RH (1984) Winter use of insular habitat patches by the Eastern cottontail. Acta Theriol 29:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Swihart RK, Lusk JJ, Duchamp JE, Rizkalla CE, Moore JE (2006) The roles of landscape context, niche breadth, and range boundaries in predicting species responses to habitat alteration. Diversity Distribution 12:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidus-Rosin A, Gilio N, Meriggi A (2008) Introduced Lagomorphs as a threat to native Lagomorphs: the case of the Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) in northern Italy. In: Alves PC, Ferrand N, Hacklander K (eds) Lagomorph biology. Evolution, ecology and conservation. Springer, Eidenberg, pp 153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidus-Rosin A, Meriggi A, Serrano-Perez S (2010) Density and habitat requirements of introduced Eastern cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 55:139–151. doi:10.4098/j.at.0001-7051.029.2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidus-Rosin A, Meriggi A, Cardarelli E, Serrano-Perez S, Mariani M-C, Corradelli C, Barba A (2011) Habitat overlap between sympatric European hares (Lepus europaeus) and Eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 56:53–61. doi:10.1007/s13364-010-0005-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2009) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Meth Ecol Evol. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2009.00001.x

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Vidus-Rosin.

Additional information

Communicated by: Emerson Vieira

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Habitat variables measured within 1-m radius-plots from forms and in 100-m radius buffers (October 2007-August 2008; Province of Pavia, northern Italy)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vidus-Rosin, A., Lizier, L., Meriggi, A. et al. Habitat selection and segregation by two sympatric lagomorphs: the case of European hares (Lepus europaeus) and Eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in northern Italy. Acta Theriol 57, 295–304 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-012-0084-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-012-0084-y

Keywords

Navigation