Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the incidence of visible strings after postplacental intracesarean insertion of Cu375 and CuT380A intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD).

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized comparative study. A total of 100 women fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent postplacental intracesarean insertion of either Cu375 IUD or CuT380A IUD. Women were followed up at 1, 6 weeks and 3 months after IUD insertion and were questioned about IUD expulsion or removal at each visit. The cervix was inspected to visualize the IUD strings. Data were analyzed by Chi-square test.

Results

At 6-week follow-up, 97.9% women in group A versus 41.7% women in group B had strings visible at the cervical os and at 3 months 100% women in group A versus only 47.9% women in group B (p < 0.001) had visible strings of IUD.

Conclusion

Both Cu375 and CuT380A IUD are safe postpartum method of contraception but Cu375 if used for intracesarean IUD insertion increases the incidence of visible IUD strings. Hence, it avoids radiological investigations and invasive procedures at follow-up visits required to locate the IUD when strings are not visible.

CTRI No. CTRI/2015/09/006221.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstuck ND, Steyn PS. Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review. Int J Women Health. 2013;5:811–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Levi E, Cantillo E, Ades V, Banks E, et al. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study. Contraception. 2012;86:102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox MC, Oat-Judge J, Severson K, et al. Immediate placement of intraiuterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception. 2011;83:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhutta SZ, Butt IJ, Bano K. Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at cesarean section. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2011;21(9):527–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Singal S, Bharti R, Dewan R, et al. Clinical outcome of post placental Copper T 380A insertion in women delivering by cesarean section. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):OC01–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gutgutia I, Kumari Usha Rani SP, Renu Arora S. Comparative evaluation of Postpartum versus post MTP insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(1):23–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lester F, Kakaire O, Byamugisha J. Intracesarean insertion of CuT380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception. 2015;91:198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dewan R, Dewan A, Singal S, et al. Non-visualisation of strings after postplacental insertion of Copper- T 380A intrauterine device. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2016;0:1–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prabhakaran S, Chuang A. In office retrieval of intrauterine contraceptive devices with missing strings. Contraception. 2011;83(2):102–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy and expulsion of post-placental and Intra cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2014;64(5):337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lucksom PG, Kanungo BK, Sebastian N, et al. Comparative study of interval versus postpartum Cu-T insertion in a central referral hospital of North East India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(1):47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arshad F, Ejaz L, Noreen H, et al. Trans cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. JSOGP. 2014;4:73–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavita Agarwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Kavita Agarwal, Dr. Rupali Dewan, Dr. Pratima Mittal and Dr. Abha Aggarwal declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Dr. Kavita Agarwal is a Assistant Professor in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi; Dr. Rupali Dewan is a Professor and Consultant in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi; Dr. Pratima Mittal is a Professor and Head of Department in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi; Dr. Abha Aggarwal is a Scientist F in NIMS, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwal, K., Dewan, R., Mittal, P. et al. Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study. J Obstet Gynecol India 67, 324–329 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-0965-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-0965-8

Keywords

Navigation