Introduction

Heavy metals are constantly discharged by mining and industrial operations. In contrary of organic pollutants which can degrade, liquid or solid rejections containing metals can cause hazardous environment contamination because the heavy metals are not biodegradable and can lead to accumulation over time along the food chain.

Lead is a heavy metal and known since the Romaine Empire as poison, it can cause serious potential damages in natural reserve of water and marine environment. It has a toxic impact on human body because it can replace calcium and be stored in bones for long periods and affects the bone cells activity via disturbing mineral metabolism (Guimarães et al. 2012; Rosen 1983; Rosin 2009). So its removal from effluents is required for the public health and environment protection.

Hence, numerous methods have been developed to recover or remove this pollutant from effluents; among these elimination processes, we cite electro-coagulation, reverse osmosis, adsorption, precipitation, flotation and electro-dialysis (Mohammadi et al. 2005; Ozaki et al. 2002; Polat and Erdogan 2007; Ramesh et al. 2008; Youcef and Achour 2006; Zongo et al. 2012). Adsorption is one of the interesting methods used for treatment of wastewater charged by this metal. The metal ions can be bind with surface materials by means of physical attractions, complex formation with functional groups or by hydrate formation (Romero-Gonzalez et al. 2001; Crist et al. 1999).

Activated carbon is the most sorbent used on industrial scale for the removal of undesirable and harmful compounds. Since it’s more expensive, investigation of some low cost materials has interested the researcher especially native or modified natural materials. For example, Naseem and Tahir (2001) have studied the capacity of bentonite clay to remove Pb(II) from aqueous and acidic solutions. Some experiments were carried out to evaluate the adsorption characteristics of the modified rice bran and straw for Pb(II) removal from aqueous solutions (Gong et al. 2011; Hengpeng  and  Zhijuan 2010). Modified and crosslinked chitosan is considered as promising material for lead and in general metal recovery (Xiong et al. 2013; Ren et al. 2013; Parka et al. 2013; Fujiwara et al. 2007). Other materials like modified sugarcane bagasse, modified oak sawdust and degreased coffee beans have been tested for metal removal (Karnitz et al. 2007; Kaikake et al. 2007; Argun et al. 2007).

The present research is interested by lignocellulosic materials obtained from wood processing like sawdust. These residues seem to be a useful alternative for metal biosorption as reported in some papers where different types with different origins of sawdust were tested (Boussahel et al. 2009; Bulut and Tez 2007; Elbariji et al. 2006; Gad et al. 2013; Hidalgo-VÁzquez et al. 2011; Samarghandi et al. 2011; Vaishya and Prasad 1991). In this context, local and available pine, beech and fir sawdust’s were tested and compared for their ability to lead biosorption. Kinetics and isotherm of Pb(II) ion adsorption were established at various experimental conditions to optimize the adsorption rate.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and materials

All chemicals were analytical grade. The synthetic wastewater solutions were prepared in double distilled water (pH 6.5–6.7) using Pb(NO3)2 (from Panreac); the dilute solutions at the required concentration for experiments were prepared from initial solution at 1,000 mg/L of Pb(II).

To change and adjust the pH, nitric acid solution (0.01 M, from Cheminova) and Sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 M, from Normapur) were used. Sodium chloride (from Merck) was added as electrolyte for the salinity effect study section.

Sawdust preparation and characterization

Sawdust was provided from Algerian joinery manufactures in Sidi Bel Abbes region (Northwest Algeria) and in period of June 2013. In the first step, the samples were subjected to a preliminary sieving to eliminate big particles. In the second step, sawdust was treated according to the physical methods previously described (Elbariji et al. 2006; Vaishya and Prasad 1991), and then sieved through a 500 µm mesh sieve and washed several times with distilled water to remove hydrosoluble impurities. Finally, the samples were dried at 40 °C to constant weight and preserved in an impermeable flask to limit potential microbiological degradation.

The Sawdust was analyzed with sieve vibrator [(RETSCH type AS 200) for the granulometry determination, FTIR spectrophotometer (ALPHA Brucker), X-ray diffraction (Xpert Pro X-ray diffractometer] and fluorescence (7221/SIEMENS SRX 3400).

Point of zero charge of pine sawdust (pHpzc)

The pHpzc of the adsorbent material is an important parameter; it determines the pH at which the adsorbent surface has net electrical neutrality. The determination of the pHpzc of the used pine sawdust was as follows: a series of 20 mL of 0.01 mol/L NaCl solutions were poured in closed conical flasks, the pH was adjusted in the range of 0.5–10. Then, in each solution, 0.2 g of adsorbent was soaked under agitation at room temperature and the final pH was measured after 24 h. The pHpzc is defined as the point where the curve pHinitial versus pHfinal crosses the line pHinitial = pHfinal.

Adsorption kinetic experiments

The adsorption kinetics were carried out in static regime; batch experiments were conducted at a controlled temperature by adding a known weight of sawdust into a number of 500 mL glass stoppered conical flasks on magnetic shaker.

Adsorption experiments included selection of sawdust type and the effect of the following parameters on the pine sawdust adsorption capacity, namely granulometry of sawdust powder, contact time, solid/liquid ratio i.e. adsorbent dosage, stirring speed, temperature, electrolyte concentration, initial Pb(II) concentration and initial solution pH.

As previously mentioned, three types of sawdust were used for lead ions adsorption tests namely pine, beech and fir sawdust. The experiments were carried out at 25 °C and pH 5.45 ± 0.05 by shaking 5 g of adsorbent and 100 mg/L Pb(II) solution at 500 rpm. The selected sawdust i.e. pine sawdust was sieved in three ranges of mean diameters and then the adsorption kinetics were conducted in the same experimental conditions.

Therefore, the next tests were conducted using pine sawdust with particle size (d) inferior to 500 µm. So, the effect of contact time was determined at 25 °C by mixing 5 g of adsorbent with 100 mg/L Pb(II) solution at 500 rpm for different time (1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 150 min). The effect of adsorbent dosage i.e. sawdust/liquid ratio was conducted at 25 °C by adding different amounts of sawdust (5, 10, 20 and 30 g/L) at 100 mg/L Pb(II) solutions at pH 5.45 ± 0.05 stirred at 500 rpm for 90 min. To investigate the effect of initial pH at 25 °C, 5 g of adsorbent was mixed with 100 mg/L Pb(II) solution at 500 rpm and at various pH values ranging from 2.0 to 6.0 for 90 min. Also, experiments were carried out by shaking 5 g of adsorbent 100 mg/L Pb(II) solution at different stirring speed (N = 500, 1,000 and 1,500 rpm) and at various temperatures (23, 40, 50 and 60 °C). The effect of initial Pb(II) concentration was conducted by adding 5 g of sawdust at Pb(II) solutions of various concentrations (50, 100, 150 and 200 mg/L) for 90 min at 25 °C. Finally, some experiments were carried out at 25 °C by mixing 5 g of sawdust with 100 mg/L Pb(II) solution containing 5, 10, 15 and 30 g/L of NaCl at 500 rpm.

Isotherm adsorption study

For isotherm studies, adsorption experiments were carried out by shaking 5 g of sawdust samples with 500 ml of Pb(II) solution at a concentration range 50–300 mg/L at a fixed temperature in a thermostated shaker bath for 90 min. At equilibrium the suspension was filtered and the metal solution was analyzed.

Metal analysis

For all experiments and at different intervals time, suspensions (10 mL) were withdrawn and filtered through filter paper (Sortorius No. 389). The Pb(II) concentrations in the filtrates were determined by atomic absorption analysis at 217 nm using Perkin Elmer-280 spectrophotometer; the calibration curves were established before each kinetic using standards at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 20 mg/L of Pb(II) solutions and where the adsorption coefficient was equal to 0.012 L/mg. The sorption efficiency is expressed in percentage by the following equation:

$${\text{Adsorption efficiency }}\;{\text{\% }} = \frac{{(C_{0} - C_{\text{r}} )}}{{C_{0} }}\; \times \;100$$
(1)

where C 0 and C r (mg/L) are respectively the initial and residual concentrations of Pb(II) ions.

For isotherms, the amount of ions adsorbed per mass unit of sawdust (mg/g) at equilibrium was evaluated using the following expression:

$$q_{\text{e}} = \frac{{\left( {C_{0} - C_{\text{e}} } \right)V}}{m}$$
(2)

where C e (mg/L) is the concentration of Pb(II) at equilibrium, V (L) is the synthetic effluent volume and m (g) is the adsorbent mass.

Results and discussion

Selection of sawdust type

In this section, the results of the Pb(II) adsorption on the three types of sawdust were compared, and the amount of ions adsorbed per mass unit of sawdust as a function of times are illustrated in Fig. 1. The plots showed that the rate of Pb removal is higher at the kinetic beginning and the adsorption equilibrium is achieved after 90 min of contact time, for the three types of sawdust. However, the lead adsorption efficiency on pine sawdust was significantly higher (94 %) than that on beech sawdust (87 %) and fir sawdust (76 %). As known, beech and fir sawdust are hardwood with a higher density, since they were not subject to chemical treatment, their capacity of metal adsorption is lower than that the pine sawdust. So, for the further tests we have selected the pine sawdust.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Lead adsorption kinetics for pine, beech and fir sawdusts

Characterization of the pine sawdust

The chosen sawdust i.e. pine sawdust was analyzed by infrared spectroscopy as shown in Fig. 2. The FTIR spectrum presented a broad band located around 3,328 cm−1 which is assigned to O–H stretching vibrations of hydrogen bonded hydroxyl groups. In fact, the hydroxyl groups are present in the primary components of wood: cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin (Argun et al. 2007; Hidalgo-VÁzquez et al. 2011). The observed bands at 2,922 and 1,689 cm−1 correspond respectively to the C–H and C=O stretching vibrations (Haider and Park 2009; Khattria and Singh 2009; Nasir et al. 2007). The strong band at 1,024 cm−1 is attributed to C–O vibration specific to the lignin component in wood sawdust. The Fig. 3 showed the RX-diffraction analysis of pine sawdust, the diffractogram indicates peaks at 22.3° and 34.5° and a broad peak around 16° which characterize the semi-crystalline cellulose structure (Cheng et al. 2011). The results of the quantitative chemical composition of pine sawdust before and after adsorption experiment obtained by X-ray fluorescence are reported in Table 1. The results revealed the presence of PbO in pine sawdust after the effluent treatment. As well, the FXR spectra confirmed the Pb adsorption by pine sawdust (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Infrared spectrum of pine sawdust

Fig. 3
figure 3

X-ray diffractogram of pine sawdust

Table 1 Elemental composition of the native and used pine sawdust: before and after effluent treatment
Fig. 4
figure 4

FXR spectra of pine sawdust before (in white color) and after (in orange color) adsorption experiment

Adsorption kinetic tests and process variables optimization

Effect of pine sawdust granulometry

Three ranges of mean diameters of sawdust powder i.e. 500 < d 1 < 800 µm, 200 < d 2 < 500 µm and d 3 < 200 µm were tested and compared, and the results of the adsorption efficiency versus time are plotted in Fig. 5. We noted that in the earlier stage, the adsorption efficiency increases as mean diameter of sawdust decreases; the remark is common since the specific surface of sawdust increases as the mean diameter decreases for non-porous particles, consequently the metal adsorption is favored (Khattria and Singh 2009).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of sawdust granulometry on Pb(II) adsorption kinetics (C 0 = 100 mg/L, pH 5.40, 500 rpm)

For the small particles (d < 200 µm), the maximum of adsorption efficiency was achieved in little time in about 20 min; however, the adsorption equilibrium time was 90 min for sawdust particles with mean diameter 200 < d < 500 µm and it was the higher (150 min) for the big particles (500 < d < 800 µm). In fact, for the same adsorbent dosage, when the particle size is small, the total surface contact of adsorbent becomes bigger and then the adsorption phenomenon is favored. The effect of sawdust granulometry on divalent metal adsorption has been also investigated by Ajmal et al. (1998) and these results are in agreement with some previous studies (LiewAbdullah et al. 2005; Me Convey and Me Kay 1985; Shukla et al. 2002).

As well, we noted that whatever the particle size, 75 % of Pb(II) was removed at 90 min of contact time. Since the elimination of the small particles of sawdust (d < 200 µm) from the aqueous solution is more difficult and expensive at the industrial scale, we have chosen sawdust with mean diameter of particles 200 < d < 500 µm for a detailed study of lead adsorption.

Contact time and Effect of initial Pb(II) concentration

Some experiments were carried out using different initial concentration of Pb(II) and at a fixed sawdust/liquid volume ratio (10 g/L). The plots of adsorption efficiency as a function of time allowed to the appropriate contact time between sawdust and ion solution (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Contact time and effect of initial concentration of Pb(II) on the adsorption efficiency

The results showed that for the low concentration of adsorbate (50 mg/L), the adsorption equilibrium was rapidly achieved; in 20 min approximately where a total ion adsorption was noticed (99 %). Also, we noted that 94 and 84 % of Pb ions were adsorbed when their initial concentrations were respectively 100 and 150 mg/L. Nevertheless, at the high concentration especially for 200 mg/L Pb(II) solution, only 70 % of adsorption efficiency was achieved after 90 min of contact time. We concluded that 10 g/L of pine sawdust is practically the sufficient adsorbent dosage for the lead adsorption from 100 mg/L Pb(II) solution.

In Fig. 6, the corresponding plot of 100 mg/L Pb(II) solution showed that the Pb(II) removal is rapid in zone I, so at the beginning; certainly the surface area of sawdust is higher in the first time and consequently the adsorption is favored. In zone II, the surface area diminished because the site became exhausted and the adsorption started in pores; consequently the metal adsorption became slow and weak. The maximum rate of Pb(II) adsorption was achieved after 90 min of stirring. Then, for the subsequent experiments the equilibrium time was maintained at 90 min. We noticed that the same contact time was observed for eucalyptus sawdust by Hamane et al. studies (Hamane and Bendjama 2007).

Effect of adsorbent dosage

These experiments gave the effect of solid/liquid ratio (r) i.e. sawdust mass (g)/effluent volume (L) on the adsorption efficiency at equilibrium (Fig. 7). The results demonstrated, for the selected sawdust and in presence of 100 mg/L of initial lead concentration that the lead adsorption efficiency did not change significantly for a solid/liquid ratio higher than 20 g/L. In fact, the adsorption efficiency obtained with 5 g/L of solid/liquid ratio was 74 %; however, for 10, 20 and 30 g/L it was 96, 98 and 99 % respectively. The results are in agreement with similar previous study for heavy metal adsorption (Bouchemal and Achour 2007; Fiset et al. 2001). However, the adsorption capacity (q e) decreases as adsorbent dosage increases (Fig. 7); the remark is common because in this range of adsorbent dosage, the adsorption efficiency didn’t change significantly and since the “q” value symbolize the mass of metal adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent, and when the weight of adsorbent is higher, the amount of Pb(II) ions adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent (q) must be lower.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Variation of equilibrium adsorption efficiency of Pb(II) ion as a function of adsorbent dosage (pH 5.45; 500 rpm, C 0 = 100 mg/L, d < 500 µm)

Effect of initial pH

The initial pH value of solution is an important factor affecting the metal sorption because it may change the surface charge of the adsorbent (Gad et al. 2013; Fiset et al. 2001); so, it is necessary to determine the point of zero charge of the used adsorbent. As shown in Fig. 8, the pHpzc which corresponds to the point of intersection of the experimental curve (pHf versus pHi) with the theoretical linear plot (pHf = pHi) is equal to 7, indicating that below this pH the sawdust particles acquire positive charge whereas above this pH a sawdust surface is negatively charged. We noticed that many types of sawdust had pHpzc around 7 (Singh et al. 2011; Ofojama and Ho 2008).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Determination of pHpzc of pine sawdust

Concerning the biosorption of Pb(II), it could not be carried out beyond pH 6 due to its potential precipitation in Pb(OH)2 form at higher pHs and therefore, for the present study, the effect of initial pH solution was analyzed only over the range from 2 to 6.

The Pb(II) removal was tested at three pH values of the synthetic effluent; in this investigation, it was observed that the % of Pb(II) removal increases as pH of the solution increases where good linear feet was observed with the three pH values.

In fact, at low pH (2.04), the adsorption efficiency at equilibrium was 84.9 %. However, at pH 4.07 and 6.0 respectively, 92.8 and 96.9 % of Pb was removed from the synthetic effluent (C 0 = 100 mg/L). The same observation was reported in some papers for the lead adsorption onto different sawdust (Marin and Ayele 2002; Taty-Costodes et al. 2003; Gad et al. 2013).

This phenomenon can be explained by the surface charge of the adsorbent and the H+ ions present in the solution. In fact, at pH < pHpzc, sawdust becomes positively charged due to the adsorption of H+ ions. Thus, the electrostatic force of repulsion between sawdust and Pb(II) is prominent at low pH. According to the pHpzc of the adsorbent (pHpzc = 7), at the pH of the adsorbate solution chosen (5.5–6.0), the superficial charge of the adsorbent is still positive and it is not so much as at pH 2; this could explain the low sorption capacity of the adsorbent. In addition, the concentration of H+ is high at low pH and they compete with Pb(II) in the solution for the active sites; therefore, the adsorption was low at low pH. While, as the pH increases, the adsorption surface becomes less positive and therefore, electrostatic attraction between the metal ions and sawdust surface is likely to be increased. Also, increasing the pH reduces the competition between the H+ and Pb(II) and then the Pb(II) uptake became more favored (Hamane and Bendjama 2007). Subsequently pH 5.5 was chosen as optimal pH for all our studies.

Effect of temperature and stirring speed

Adsorption kinetics of Pb(II) onto pine sawdust were carried out at various temperatures (23, 40, 50 and 60 °C). The results showed that at the earlier stage of kinetics i.e. under the first 10 min, the lead removal rate increased as temperature increased. While, at equilibrium (after 90 min), we noted that the adsorption efficiency is conversely proportional to the temperature; this effect is clear in Fig. 9 where the amount of Pb(II) ions adsorbed per mass unit of sawdust (q e) was plotted as function of temperature. So the lead adsorption is an exothermic phenomenon since it is favored at low temperature (Jianga et al. 2009; Kim et al. 1999). This fact can be explained either by the higher mobility of ions at high temperature or by the destruction or solubilisation of adsorption sites. At high temperature and due to the large kinetic energy of particles, in the earlier time the possibility of collision between metal and adsorbent sites is higher; however, when reaching equilibrium the probability of collision and consequently fixation of metal ions become unprivileged because majority of sites on surface are occupied. As well, it was observed that at high temperature, adsorption sites can be subject to destruction or solubilization like the tannin onto sawdust as reported in Fiset et al. (2001) revue and so the adsorption phenomenon is disfavored.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of temperature on the amount of Pb(II) ions adsorbed per mass unit of sawdust at equilibrium (pH 5.45, C 0 = 100 mg/L, N = 500 rpm, r = 10 g/L)

For the present results, a best linear relationship between q e and temperature was obtained with 0.992 of coefficient of determination. For other effluents, temperature can possess positive effect and the adsorption process becomes endothermic (Zou et al. 2013; Gad et al. 2013).

To investigate the effect of stirring speed on the metal removal, the kinetics were conducted under different stirring speed; 500, 1,000 and 1,500 rpm. The results demonstrated that the stirring speed didn’t affect significantly the adsorption efficiency in the present conditions.

Effect of electrolyte concentration

The Pb(II) removal was also studied in presence of 5, 10, 15 and 30 g/L of NaCl, the amount of ions adsorbed per mass unit of pine sawdust at equilibrium as a function of electrolyte concentration is given in Fig. 10. We noted that the adsorption efficiency is unprivileged in salty effluents. In fact, the sodium ions are smaller than lead ones and consequently they are preferably fixed onto adsorbent sites than metal ions, the same effect was reported by Gupta et al. (2001) for heavy metal adsorption on red-mud.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Effect of electrolyte (NaCl) concentration on the amount of Pb(II) ions adsorbed per mass unit of sawdust at equilibrium (pH 5.45, C 0 = 100 mg/L, N = 500 rpm, r = 10 g/L)

Adsorption isotherms

The study of adsorption isotherms is imperative to describe the adsorption mechanism and so the interaction of metal ion on the adsorbent surface. The previous experiments permitted as to determine the optimal conditions relating to adsorbent and adsorbate, for the lead removal using the available pine sawdust: pH 5.42, N = 500 rpm, r = 10 g/L, d < 500 µm, without NaCl, contact time 90 min.

In these conditions and by varying metal concentration from 50 to 300 mg/L, the adsorption isotherm of Pb(II) was studied at 23 ± 2 °C; the amount of adsorbate at equilibrium per unit mass of adsorbent as a function of adsorbate concentration is given in Fig. 11.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Adsorption isotherm of Pb ions onto pine sawdust

According to Giles et al.‘s classification (Giles et al. 1960; Chitour 2004), in this case, adsorption isotherm of Pb(II) ions onto the used pine sawdust is “L” type. The equilibrium data were analyzed by considering the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.

Freundlich isotherm model

The empirical Freundlich isotherm model can describe the adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces. The linear form of Freundlich isotherm equation is:

$${\text{Ln }}q_{\text{e}} = \ln K_{\text{F}} + \left( \frac{1}{n} \right)\ln C_{\text{e}}$$
(3)

where, q e is the amount of metal ions adsorbed per unit weight of sawdust (mg/g), C e is the equilibrium concentration of the metal ion in the equilibrium solution (mg/L), K F is constant characteristic of the relative adsorption capacity of adsorbent and 1/n is the indicative constant of the sorption process intensity. The model has been tested and the obtained plot is given in Fig. 12.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Freundlich plot of Pb(II) adsorption results onto pine sawdust

Langmuir isotherm model

The adsorption results of Pb(II) onto pine sawdust were fitted in Langmuir equation :

$$\frac{{C_{\text{e}} }}{{q_{\text{e}} }} = \left( {\frac{1}{{Q_{0} b}}} \right) + \frac{{C_{\text{e}} }}{{Q_{0} }}$$
(4)

where C e is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L), q e is the amount of Pb(II) adsorbed at equilibrium time (mg/g) and Q 0 and b are Langmuir constants related to adsorption capacity and energy of adsorption. The linearized Langmuir plot of C e/q e versus C e is shown in Fig. 13.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Langmuir plot of Pb(II) onto pine sawdust

The additional analysis of the Langmuir equation can be made on the basis of the dimensionless equilibrium parameter R L (Hall et al. 1966). For a favorable adsorption, the value of R L is between 0 and 1, while R L > 1 represents an unfavorable adsorption, R L = 1 represents the linear adsorption, and if R L = 0 the adsorption operation is irreversible. The R L value can be calculated by Eq. (5):

$$R_{L} = \frac{1}{{1 + bC_{0} }}$$
(5)

The Freundlich and Langmuir parameters are given in Table 2. The results demonstrated that the Pb(II) adsorption on the selected pine sawdust is well fitted by Langmuir model where the coefficient of determination is equal to 0.9994 and the adsorption capacity is about 16 which proved a good affinity and monolayer adsorption of Pb(II) onto sawdust adsorbent.

Table 2 Freundlich and Langmuir parameters for Pb(II) adsorption isotherms

Furthermore, the dimensionless parameter R L, is found in the range of 0.010 and 0.0577 (0 < R L < 1) which confirms the favorable adsorption process for Pb(II) using pine sawdust.

Conclusion

In this study, available pine sawdust was highlighted by a number of adsorption tests of lead ions in various experimental conditions. Firstly, a comparison between three types of sawdust; pine, beech and fir sawdust’s which had respectively 94, 87 and 75 % of adsorption efficiency, permitted to select the good adsorbent for lead removal from the synthetic effluent.

Secondly, the optimization of experimental conditions leads to the following conclusions for pine sawdust with particle size lower than 500 µm: 90 min is a sufficient contact time for 96 % of Pb(II) removal from synthetic effluent at initial concentration of 100 mg/L and at optimum pH 5.5 and using 10 g/L of sawdust weight/volume of liquid effluent ratio (r). Almost total adsorption of Pb(II) was obtained when r = 30 mg/L and in about 20 min of contact time.

The equilibrium data are best fitted with Langmuir isotherm model, the results demonstrated a favorable and monolayer adsorption mechanism of Pb(II) onto the selected sawdust.