Abstract
Voltage instability is a major problem in power system it seldom results in voltage collapse and blackout. FACTS devices can be used to maintain voltage stability by controlling active and reactive power and increase voltage stability margin. Optimal location of these devices is also an important issue. In this paper static var compensator (SVC) is used to improve voltage stability. Optimal location of SVC is found by continuation power flow and by finding fast voltage stability index. SVC is placed at optimal location and its effect on improving voltage stability, loadability limit and reducing power losses have been studied under normal as well as contingency conditions. Two types of contingencies are considered, transmission line (N − 1) contingency and generator outage contingency. The proposed work is tested in IEEE 14 bus test system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asija D, Choudekar P, Soni KM, Sinha SK (2015) Power flow study and contingency status of WSCC 9 bus test system using MATLAB. International conference on recent developments in control, automation and power engineering (RDCAPE), pp 338–342
Bhaladhare SB, Bedekar PP (2013) Enhancement of voltage stability through optimal location of SVC. Int J Electron Comput Sci Eng 2(2):671–677
Cai L (2004) Robust co-ordinated control of FACTS devices in large power systems a PhD thesis, University of Duisburg, Germany, published by Logos Verlag Berlin
Choudekar P, Asija D (2016) Prediction of voltage collapse in power system using voltage stability indices. Adv Intell Syst Comput 479:51–58
Faur ZT (1996) Effects of FACTS devices on static voltage collapse phenomena. M.S. dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Waterloo
Hingorani NG, Gyugyi L (2001) Understanding FACTS-concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission systems, First Indian edn. IEEE Press, New York
Inkollu SR, Kota VR (2016) Optimal setting of FACTS devices for voltage stability improvement using PSO adaptive GSA hybrid algorithm. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(3):1166–1176
Kundur P, Paserba J, Ajjarapu V, Andersson G, Bose A, Canizares CA, Hatziargyriou N, Hill D, Stankovic A, Taylor C, Va Cutsem T, Vittal V (2004) Definition and classification of power system stability. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(2):1387–1401
Laïfa A, Boudour M (2009) Optimal location of SVC for voltage security enhancement using MOPSO. J Electr Syst, Special issue no 01, 73–78
Prabhakar P, Kumar A (2016) Voltage stability boundary and margin enhancement with FACTS and HVDC. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 82:429–438
Roselyn P, Devaraj D, Dash SS (2014) Multi-objective genetic algorithm for voltage stability enhancement using rescheduling and FACTS devices. Ain Shams Eng J 5(3):789–801
Sarvi M, Marefatjou H (2012) Performance of SVC and UPFC in static voltage stability margin enhancement in two area power system with continuation power flow method. IEEJ 3(3):803–809
Siddiqui AS, Deb T (2014) Voltage stability improvement using STATCOM and SVC. Int J Comput Appl 88(14):0975–8887
Udgir S, Srivastava L, Pandit M (2014) Optimal placement and sizing of SVC for loss minimization and voltage security improvement using differential evolution algorithm. In: IEEE international conference on recent advances and innovations in engineering (ICRAIE-201), May 9–11, 2014, pp 1–6
Yorino N, El-Araby EE, Sasaki H, Harada S (2003) A new formulation for FACTS allocation for security enhancement against voltage collapse. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(1):3–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choudekar, P., Sinha, S.K. & Siddiqui, A. Optimal location of SVC for improvement in voltage stability of a power system under normal and contingency condition. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8 (Suppl 2), 1312–1318 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0601-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0601-0