Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Three Types of Denture Adhesives on the Retention of Maxillary Denture Bases: An In Vivo Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Abstract

There are many factors involved in the success of a good quality complete dentures, one of them is retention. There are some forcing situations where providing optimal retention may be a problem, in which use of denture adhesives is recommended. In the present study, primary and secondary impressions were made on 20 completely edentulous patients, master cast was fabricated. Master cast was duplicated; heat-cured denture base was fabricated. The retention test for control group, powder group, wafer group, paste group was done using a customized force sensor device. Readings was subjected to ANOVA followed by post hoc test. Results show that the retention force value of the paste group was the maximum, followed by powder group, wafer group and the least retention force value was observed with control group. Within the limitations of the study it can be concluded that the paste form of denture adhesive has the best retentive property compared to the powder and wafer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Graph 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar MS, Thombare RU (2011) A comparative analysis of the effect of various denture adhesives available in market on the retentive ability of the maxillary denture: an in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 11:82–88

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chowdhry P, Phukela SS, Patil R, Yadav H (2010) A study to evaluate the retentive ability of different denture adhesive materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 10:176–181

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glossary of prosthodontic terms. The academy of prosthodontics (2005) J Prosthet Dent 94:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Eissmann HF (1980) Dental laboratory procedures complete dentures, vol 1. Mosby, Maryland Heights, pp 261–283

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zarb GA, Bolender CL (2004) Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients Complete denture and implant supported prostheses, 12th edn. Mosby, Maryland Heights, pp 442–447

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy IR, Kapur KK (1958) Posterior border seal-its rationale and importance. J Prosthet Dent 8:386–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mondziekten A (2004) Research methods in dentistry. Methods to quantify retention of complete dentures. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 111:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  8. Avant WE (1973) A comparison of the retention of complete denture bases having different types of posterior palatal seal. J Prosthet Dent 29:484–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ostlund SG (1960) Saliva and denture retention. J Prosthet Dent 10:638–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lamb DJ, Samara R, Johnson A (2005) Palatal discrepancies and postdams. J Oral Rehabil 32:188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell RL (1956) Effects of water sorption on retention of acrylic resin denture bases. J Am Dent Assoc 52:448–452

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stephens AP, Cox CM, Sharry JJ (1966) Diurnal variations in palatal tissue thickness. J Prosthet Dent 16:661–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Colon A, Kotwal K, Mangelsdorff AD (1982) Analysis of the posterior palatal seal and the palatal form as related to the retention of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 47:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Skinner EW, Chung P (1951) The effect of surface contact in the retention of a denture. J Prosthet Dent 1(229):35

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Furio A, Gehl DH (1970) Clinical study of the retention of maxillary complete dentures with different base materials. J Prosthet Dent 23:374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamrick JE (1962) A comparison of the retention of various denture-base materials. JProsthet Dent 12:666–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chew CL (1990) Retention of denture adhesives—an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 17:425–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghani F, Picton DCA, Likeman PR (1991) Some factors affecting retention forces with the use of denture fixatives in vivo. Br Dent J 171:15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. G. Naveen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pachore, N.J., Patel, J.R., Sethuraman, R. et al. A Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Three Types of Denture Adhesives on the Retention of Maxillary Denture Bases: An In Vivo Study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14, 369–375 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0334-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0334-y

Keywords

Navigation