Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Daughter-Initiated Cancer Screening Appeals to Mothers

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Youth-initiated health interventions may provide a much needed avenue for intergenerational dissemination of health information among families who bear the greatest burden from unequal distribution of morbidity and mortality. The findings presented in this paper are from a pilot study of the feasibility and impact of female youth-initiated messages (mostly daughters) encouraging adult female relatives (mostly mothers) to obtain cancer screening within low-income African American families living in a Southern US state. Results are compared between an intervention and control group. Intervention group youth (n = 22) were exposed to a 60-min interactive workshop where they were assisted to prepare a factual and emotional appeal to their adult relative to obtain specific screening. The face-to-face workshops were guided by the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Control group girls (n = 18) were only provided with a pamphlet with information about cancer screening and specific steps about how to encourage their relative to obtain screening. Intervention youth (86 %) and adults (82 %) reported that the message was shared while 71 % in the control group reported sharing or receiving the message. Importantly, more women in the intervention group reported that they obtained a screen (e.g., mammogram, Pap smear) directly based on the youth’s appeal. These findings can have major implications for youth-initiated health promotion efforts, especially among hard-to-reach populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kemmis S, McTaggart R, D.U. (1982) The Action research planner. Deakin University Press, Victoria, Australia

  2. McNiff J, Whitehead J (2002) Action research: principles and practice. RoutledgeFalmer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Onyango-Ouma W, Aagaard-Hansen J, Jensen BB (2005) The potential of schoolchildren as health change agents in rural western Kenya. Soc Sci Med 61(8):1711–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Browne JL, Chan AYC (2012) Mother-daughter communication about mammography in an Australian sample. J Fam Commun 12(2):129–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mosavel M (2009) The feasibility of mothers accepting health advice from their daughters. J Health Care Poor Underserved 20:42–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mwanga JR et al (2008) School children as health change agents in Magu, Tanzania: a feasibility study. Health Promot Int 23(1):16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O'Keefe EB, Meltzer JP, Bethea TN (2015) Health disparities and cancer: racial disparities in cancer mortality in the United States, 2000–2010. Front Public Health 15(3):51

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tao L, Gomez SL, Keegan TH, Kurian AW, Clark CA (2015) Breast cancer mortality in African-American and non-Hispanic white women by molecular subtype and stage at diagnosis: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 24(7):1039–1045 [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu JC, Parajuli S, Blackman E, Gibbs D, Ellis A, Hull A, et al. High prevalence of discordant HPV and p16 oropharynx squamous cell carcinomas in an African American cohort. Head Neck. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].

  10. Ayi I et al (2010) School-based participatory health education for malaria control in Ghana: engaging children as health messengers. Malar J 9:98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kratzke C, Amatya A, Vilchis H (2014) Differences among college women for breast cancer prevention acquired information-seeking, desired apps and texts, and daughter-initiated information to mothers. J Community Health 39(2):291–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mosavel M, Genderson MW (2013) From adolescent daughter to mother: Exploring message design strategies for breast and cervical cancer prevention and screening. J Cancer Educ 28(3):558–564

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mosavel M, Simon C, Van Stade D (2006) The mother-daughter relationship: what is its potential as a locus for health promotion? Health Care Women Int 27(7):646–664

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Petty RE, Cacioppa JT (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental psychology. Academic, Wisconsin, pp 123–205

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones L, Sinclair R, Courneya K (2003) The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 33(1):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ajzen I, Albarracin D, Hornik R (2007) Prediction and change of health behavior: applying the reasoned action approach. Taylor and Francis, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ajzen I (2012) Attitudes and persuasion. In: Deaux K, Snyder M (eds) The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 367–393

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aronowitz A, Morrison-Beedy D (2004) Resilience to risk-taking behaviors in impoverished African American girls: the role of mother-daughter connectedness. Res Nurs Health 27(1):29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wills T et al (2003) Family communication and religiosity related to substance use and sexual behavior in early adolescence. Psychol Addict Behav 17(4):312–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vickberg S et al (2000) Intrusive thoughts and psychological distress among breast cancer survivors: global meaning as a possible protective factor. Behav Med 25(4):152–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McCroskey J, Teven J (1999) Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Commun Monogr 66(1):90–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 2013 Poverty Guidelines. 2013. Federal Register. p. 5182–5183.

  23. Geneau R et al (2010) Raising the priority of preventing chronic diseases: a political process. Lancet 376(9753):1689–1698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DeSantis C et al (2011) Breast cancer statistics, 2011. CA Cancer J Clin 61(6):408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Swan J et al (2010) Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States. Cancer 116(20):4872–4881

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Mosavel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mosavel, M., Genderson, M.W. Daughter-Initiated Cancer Screening Appeals to Mothers. J Canc Educ 31, 767–775 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0949-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0949-2

Keywords

Navigation