Abstract
Quality improvement measures are uniformly applied to all oncology providers, regardless of their roles. Little is known about differences in adherence to these measures between oncology fellows, advance practice providers (APP), and attending physicians. We investigated conformance across Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) measures for oncology fellows, advance practice providers, and attending physicians at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (DVAMC). Using data collected from the Spring 2012 and 2013 QOPI cycles, we abstracted charts of patients and separated them based on their primary provider. Descriptive statistics and the chi-square test were calculated for each QOPI measure between fellows, advanced practice providers (APPs), and attending physicians. A total of 169 patients were reviewed. Of these, 31 patients had a fellow, 39 had an APP, and 99 had an attending as their primary oncology provider. Fellows and attending physicians performed similarly on 90 of 94 QOPI metrics. High-performing metrics included several core QOPI measures including documenting consent for chemotherapy, recommending adjuvant chemotherapy when appropriate, and prescribing serotonin antagonists when prescribing emetogenic chemotherapies. Low-performing metrics included documentation of treatment summary and taking action to address problems with emotional well-being by the second office visit. Attendings documented the plan for oral chemotherapy more often (92 vs. 63 %, P = 0.049). However, after the chart audit, we found that fellows actually documented the plan for oral chemotherapy 88 % of the time (p = 0.73). APPs and attendings performed similarly on 88 of 90 QOPI measures. The quality of oncology care tends to be similar between attendings and fellows overall; some of the significant differences do not remain significant after a second manual chart review, highlighting that the use of manual data collection for QOPI analysis is an imperfect system, and there may be significant inter-observer variability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) (2013) American Society of Clinical Oncology
Neuss MN, Desch CE, McNiff KK et al (2005) A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol 23:6233–6239
Coscio AM, Anguiano AN, Kuderer M, Kelley M (2008) Improving quality at university based hematology/oncology fellowship continuity clinic with the quality oncology practice initiative (QOPI), 2008 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings
Rogart JN, Siddiqui UD, Jamidar PA et al (2008) Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 103:2841–2846
Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al (2011) Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1223–1231
Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB et al (2004) Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714–724
Warner JL, Anick P, Drews RE (2013) Physician inter-annotator agreement in the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative manual abstraction task. J Oncol Pract 9:e96–e102
Acknowledgments
We thank all the Hematology-Oncology providers who performed chart abstractions for QOPI at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (DVAMC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, J., Zhang, T., Shah, R. et al. Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Measure Adherence Between Oncology Fellows, Advanced Practice Providers, and Attending Physicians. J Canc Educ 30, 774–778 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0798-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0798-z