Skip to main content
Log in

High Reliability Organizations—Medication Safety

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High reliability organizations (HROs), such as the aviation industry, successfully engage in high-risk endeavors and have low incidence of adverse events. HROs have a preoccupation with failure and errors. They analyze each event to effect system wide change in an attempt to mitigate the occurrence of similar errors. The healthcare industry can adapt HRO practices, specifically with regard to teamwork and communication. Crew resource management concepts can be adapted to healthcare with the use of certain tools such as checklists and the sterile cockpit to reduce medication errors. HROs also use The Swiss Cheese Model to evaluate risk and look for vulnerabilities in multiple protective barriers, instead of focusing on one failure. This model can be used in medication safety to evaluate medication management in addition to using the teamwork and communication tools of HROs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. In: Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds) Committee on health care in America. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century, Committee on quality health care in America. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Medicine (2006) Preventing medication errors: quality chasm series. In: Aspden P, Wolcott JA, Bootman JL, Cronenwett LR (eds) Committee on identifying and preventing medication errors. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts KH (1993) Cultural characteristics of reliability enhancing organizations. J Manag Issues 5:165–181

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing Co, Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability: process of collective mindfulness. In: Sutton RS, Staw BM (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 1. JAI Press, Stanford, pp 81–123

    Google Scholar 

  7. La Porte TR, Roberts K, Rochlin GI. Aircraft carrier operations at sea: The challenges of high reliability performance. No. IGS/OTP-1-88. California Univ Berkeley Inst of Governmental Studies; 1988.

  8. Roberts KH (1989) New challenges in organizational research: high reliability organizations. Ind Crisis Q 3:111–125

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, Helmreich RL (2003) Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians. Crit Care Med 31:956–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202:746–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. The Joint Commission. Sentinel Event Data Root Causes by Event Type 2004–2013. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Root_Causes_by_Event_Type_2004-2Q2013.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2015.

  12. Cooper GE, White MD, Lauber JK, editors. Resource management on the flight deck. Proceedings of the NASA/Industry workshop. San Francisco, CA: NASA, June 26–28, 1979; NASA-CP-2120.

  13. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA (1999) The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol 9:19–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pape TM (2003) Applying airline safety practices to medication administration. Med-Surg Nursing 12:77–93

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fore AM, Sculli GL, Albee D et al (2013) Improving patient safety using the sterile cockpit principle during medication administration: a collaborative, unit-based project. J Nurs Manag 21:106–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. § 121.542 Flight crewmember duties. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title14-vol3/pdf/CFR-2011-title14-vol3-sec121-542.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2015.

  17. Pape TM, Guerra DM, Muzquiz M et al (2005) Innovative approaches to reducing nurses’ distractions during medication administration. J Contin Educ Nurs 36:108–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Relihan E, O’Brien V, O’Hara S et al (2010) The impact of a set of interventions to reduce interruptions and distractions to nurses during medication administration. Qual Saf Health Care 19:e52

  19. Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320:768–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Yip.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yip, L., Farmer, B. High Reliability Organizations—Medication Safety. J. Med. Toxicol. 11, 257–261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-015-0471-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-015-0471-2

Keywords

Navigation