Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of single and repeated flaming on yield components and yield of maize

  • Published:
Organic Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weeds are a major yield-limiting factor in both conventional and organic crop production systems. In maize (Zea mays) production, propane flaming could be used as an additional tool for weed control. Thus, maize tolerance to single and repeated flaming was studied with eight treatments, which included the following: nonflamed control and broadcast flaming conducted once at V2 (two-leaf), V4 (four-leaf), and V6 (six-leaf) stage, two times (each at V2 and V4, V2 and V6, and V4 and V6 stages), and three times (at V2, V4, and V6 stages). All the plots including the nonflamed control were maintained weed-free during the entire growing season by hoeing as weeds appeared. A propane dose of 50 kg ha−1 was applied with torches parallel to the crop row and at an operating speed of 4.8 km h−1 for all treatments. The crop responses evaluated were crop injury at 7 and 28 days after treatment and effects on yield components and yield. Maize exhibited excellent tolerance to single and double flaming regardless of the growth stage. However, the triple flaming resulted in more than 30 % injury. Maize flamed once and twice produced between 11.1 and 11.6 t ha−1 yield, which was statistically similar to the yield obtained from the nonflamed control (11.7 t ha−1). Maize flamed three times yielded 9.9 t ha−1, which was 8.5 % lower compared to the nonflamed control yield, and likely would not be acceptable by producers. Results of this study indicate that maize is able to tolerate up to two flaming treatments per season without a loss of yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouziena HFH, Omar AAM, Sharma SD, Singh M (2009) Efficacy comparison of some new natural-product herbicides for weed control at two growth stages. Weed Technol 23:431–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ascard J (1995) Effects of flame weeding on weed species at different developmental stages. Weed Res 35:397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascard J (1998) Comparison of flaming and infrared radiation techniques for thermal weed control. Weed Res 38:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolo ME, Schwartz HF, Schweissing FC (1994) Yield and growth response of onion to simulated storm damage. HortSci 29:1465–1467

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd NS, Brennan EB, Fennimore SA (2006) Stale seedbed techniques for organic vegetable production. Weed Technol 20:1052–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruening CA (2009) Development of propane flaming equipment for thermal weed control in agronomic crops. M.S. thesis, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA

  • Bruening CA, Gogos G, Ulloa SM, Knezevic SZ (2009) Performance advantages of flaming hood. In: Hartzler RG and Hartzler AN (eds) Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society conference, vol 64. Kansas City, MO, USA, p 30

  • Datta A, Knezevic SZ (2013) Flaming as an alternative weed control method for conventional and organic agronomic crop production systems: a review. Adv Agron 118:399–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltbrunner J, Liedgens M, Bloch L, Stamp P, Streit B (2007) Legume cover crops as living mulches for organic wheat: components of biomass and the control of weeds. Eur J Agron 26:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Knezevic SZ, Ulloa SM (2007) Flaming: potential new tool for weed control in organically grown agronomic crops. J Agric Sci 52:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Knezevic SZ, Datta A, Bruening C, Gogos G (2012) Propane-fueled flame weeding in corn, soybean, and sunflower. http://www.agpropane.com/uploadedFiles/Agriculture/Program_Safety_On_The_Farm/Flame%20Weeding%20Training%20Manual_08-27-12_final%20(2).pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2012

  • Knezevic SZ, Stepanovic S, Datta A, Nedeljkovic D, Tursun N (2013) Soybean yield and yield components as influenced by the single and repeated flaming. Crop Prot 50:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penfold CM, Miyan MS, Reeves TG, Grierson IT (1995) Biological farming for sustainable agricultural production. Aust J Exp Agric 35:849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifai MN, Astatkie T, Lacko‐Bartosova M, Gadus J (2002) Effect of two different thermal units and three types of mulch on weeds in apple orchards. J Environ Eng Sci 1:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoup DE, Al-Khatib K, Peterson DE (2003) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 51:145–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sivesind EC, Leblanc ML, Cloutier DC, Seguin P, Stewart KA (2012) Impact of selective flame weeding on onion yield, pungency, flavonoid concentration, and weeds. Crop Prot 39:45–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS) (2005) The GLIMMIX procedure. Version 9.1. Online documentation. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA

  • Ulloa SM, Datta A, Knezevic SZ (2010a) Growth stage influenced differential response of foxtail and pigweed species to broadcast flaming. Weed Technol 24:319–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulloa SM, Datta A, Knezevic SZ (2010b) Tolerance of selected weed species to broadcast flaming at different growth stages. Crop Prot 29:1381–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulloa SM, Datta A, Bruening C, Neilson B, Mille J, Gogos G, Knezevic SZ (2011a) Maize response to broadcast flaming at different growth stages: Effects on growth, yield and yield components. Eur J Agron 34:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulloa SM, Datta A, Knezevic SZ (2011b) Growth stage influenced sorghum response to broadcast flaming: effects on yield and its components. Agron J 103:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz E (1999) Final results of the Third Biennial National Organic Farmers’ Survey. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wszelaki AL, Doohan DJ, Alexandrou A (2007) Weed control and crop quality in cabbage [Brassica oleracea (capitata group)] and tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) using a propane flamer. Crop Prot 26:134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Propane Education and Research Council and the Nebraska Propane Association for the partial financial support of this project. We are also grateful for the help provided by Jon Scott and many summer helpers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avishek Datta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Datta, A., Stepanovic, S., Nedeljkovic, D. et al. Impact of single and repeated flaming on yield components and yield of maize. Org. Agr. 3, 141–147 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-013-0053-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-013-0053-z

Keywords

Navigation