Skip to main content
Log in

The Difference in Light use Efficiency between an Abandoned Peatland Pasture and an Adjacent Boreal Bog in Western Newfoundland, Canada

  • Peatlands
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light use efficiency (LUE) is a critical parameter to estimate the gross primary production (GPP) for terrestrial ecosystems from remotely sensed data. Only a few studies have estimated the LUE for boreal peatlands and none has calculated the LUE for a drained boreal peatland due to the limited availability of direct measurement of GPP and absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), which are required to calculate the LUE. In this study, we used eddy covariance (EC) measurement of GPP and APAR at a drained peatland pasture and an adjacent boreal bog to calculate the LUE. The pasture had a significantly higher LUE (0.034 ± 0.0109 mol mol-1) than the bog (0.028 ± 0.098 mol mol-1). The LUE showed significant year-to-year variation at the pasture, but not at the bog. The LUE variation strongly correlated with air temperature and water table depth at both sites, but did not correlate well with vapor pressure deficit. This study indicates that agricultural drainage significantly alters the LUE of boreal peatlands and that the drained peatlands need to be considered separately in LUE-based models for northern peatlands. Moreover, a longer period of study is needed to fully understand the temporal dynamics of LUE in natural peatlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1:
Fig. 2:
Fig. 3:
Fig. 4:
Fig. 5:
Fig. 6:
Fig. 7:
Fig. 8:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahl DE, Gower ST, Mackay DS, Burrows SN, Norman JM, Diak GR (2004) Heterogeneity of light use efficiency in a northern Wisconsin forest: implications for modeling net primary production with remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 93:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahl DE, Gower ST, Burrows SN, Shabanov NV, Myneni RB, Knyazikhin Y (2006) Monitoring spring canopy phenology of a deciduous broadleaf forest using MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment 104:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne DM, Hribljan JA, Pypker TG, Chimner RA (2014) Long-term water table manipulations alter peatland gaseous carbon fluxes in Northern Michigan. Wetlands Ecol Manage 2014(12):35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-013-9320-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, McClain CR, Feldman GC, Los SO, Tucker CJ, Falkowski PG, Field CB, Frouin R, Esaias WE, Kolber DD, Pollack NH (2001) Biospheric primary production during an ENSO Transition. Science 291:2594–2597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Shen M, Kato T (2009) Diurnal and seasonal variations in light-use efficiency in an alpine meadow ecosystem: causes and implications for remote sensing. Journal of Plant Ecology 2:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J, Roulet NT, Seaquist JW, Holden NM, Lafleur PM, Humphreys ER, Heumann BW, Ward SM (2009) Using MODIS derived fPAR with ground based flux tower measurements to derive the light use efficiency for two Canadian peatlands. Biogeosciences 6:225–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dise NB (2009) Peatland Response to Global Change. Science 326:810–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eickenscheidt T, Heinichen J, Drosler M (2015) The greenhouse gas balance of a drained fen peatland is mainly controlled by land-use rather than soil organic carbon content. Biogeosciences 12:5161–5184. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5161-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatis N, Luscombe DJ, Grand-Clement E, Hartley IP, Anderson K, Smith D, Brazier RE (2016) The effect of drainage ditches on vegetation diversity and CO2 fluxes in a Molinia caerulea-dominated peatland. Ecohydrology 9:407–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gitelson AA, Gamon JA (2015) The need for a common basis for defining light-use efficiency: Implications for productivity estimation. Remote Sensing of Environment 156:196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz SJ, Prince SD (1998) Variability in carbon exchange and light utilization among boreal forest stands: implications for remote sensing of net primary production. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:375–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz SJ, Prince SD (1999) Modelling terrestrial carbon exchange and storage: evidence and implications of functional convergence in light-use efficiency. In A.H. Fitter & D. Raffaelli (Eds.), Advances in Ecological Research (pp. 57-92): Academic Press

  • Gorham E (1991) Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. Ecological Applications 1:182–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham E, Janssens JA, Glaser PH (2003) Rates of peat accumulation during the postglacial period in 32 sites from Alaska to Newfoundland, with special emphasis on northern Minnesota. Canadian Journal of Botany 81:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST, Kucharik CJ, Norman JM (1999) Direct and Indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial Ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment 70:29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilker T, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Black TA, Guy RD (2008) The use of remote sensing in light use efficiency based models of gross primary production: A review of current status and future requirements. Science of the Total Environment 404:411–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarveoja J, Peichl M, Maddison M, Soosaar K, Vellak K, Karofeld E, Teemusk A, Mander Ü (2016) Impact of water table level on annual carbon and greenhouse gas balances of a restored peat extraction area. Biogeosciences 13:2637–2651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karki A, Elsgaard L, Kandel TP, Laerke PE (2016) Carbon balance of rewetted and drained peat soils used for biomass production: a mesocosm study. GCB Bioenergy 2016(8):969–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kross A, Seaquist JW, Roulet NT (2016) Light use efficiency of peatlands: Variability and suitability for modeling ecosystem production. Remote Sensing of Environment 183:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagergren F, Eklundh L, Grelle A, Lundblad M, MÖLder M, Lankreijer H, Lindroth A (2005) Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden. Plant, Cell & Environment 28:412–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindroth A, Lund M, Nilsson M, Aurela M, Christensen TR, Laurila T, Rinne J, Riutta T, Sagerfors J, Ström L (2007) Environmental controls on the CO2 exchange in north European mires. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 59:812–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohila A, Minkkinen K, Aurela M, Tuovinen JP, Penttila T, Ojanen P, Laurila T (2011) Greenhouse gas flux measurements in a forestry-drained peatland indicate a large carbon sink. Biogeosciences 8:3203–3218. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-3203-2011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luan J, Wu J (2015) Long-term agricultural drainage stimulates CH4 emissions from ditches through increased substrate availability in a boreal peatland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 214:68–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lund M, R. Christensen T, Lindroth A, Schubert P (2012) Effects of drought conditions on the carbon dynamics in a temperate peatland. Environmental Research Letters 7:045704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2015) Wetlands, 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, p 456

  • Monteith JL (1972) Solar radiation and productivity in tropical ecosytems. Journal of Applied Ecology 9:747–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the Efficiency of Crop Production in Britain. Biological Sciences 281:277–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MT, Moore TR (2010) Linking root production to aboveground plant characteristics and water table in a temperate bog. Plant and Soil 336:219–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakaji T, Kosugi Y, Takanashi S, Niiyama K, Noguchi S, Tani M, Oguma H, Nik AR, Kassim AR (2014) Estimation of light-use efficiency through a combinational use of the photochemical reflectance index and vapor pressure deficit in an evergreen tropical rainforest at Pasoh, Peninsular Malaysia. Remote Sensing of Environment 150:82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleszczuk, R., Regina, K., Szajdak, L., Höper, H., & Maryganova, V. (2008). Impacts of agricultural utilization of peat soils on the greenhouse gas balance. Peatlands and climate change, 70-97

  • Otieno DO, Wartinger M, Nishiwaki A, Hussain MZ, Muhr J, Borken W, Lischeid G (2009) Responses of CO2 exchange and primary production of the ecosystem components to environmental changes in a mountain peatland. Ecosystems 12:590–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruimy A, Saugier B, Dedieu G (1994) Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 99:5263–5283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, Zhao M, Reeves M, Hashimoto H (2004) A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production. BioScience 54:547–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalm CR, Black TA, Amiro BD, Arain MA, Barr AG, Bourque CPA, Dunn AL, Flanagan LB, Giasson M-A, Lafleur PM, Margolis HA, McCaughey JH, Orchansky AL, Wofsy SC (2006) Photosynthetic light use efficiency of three biomes across an east–west continental-scale transect in Canada. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 140:269–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder R, Paw U (2006) Measuring vapour pressure deficit in the field. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack M, Zuback YCA (2013) Annual carbon balance of a peatland 10 yr following restoration. Biogeosciences 10:2885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Syed KH, Flanagan LB, Carlson PJ, Glenn AJ, Van Gaalen KE (2006) Environmental control of net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a treed, moderately rich fen in northern Alberta. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 140:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarnocai C (2006) The effect of climate change on carbon in Canadian peatlands. Global and Planetary Change 53:222–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner DP, Gower ST, Cohen WB, Gregory M, Maiersperger TK (2002) Effects of spatial variability in light use efficiency on satellite-based NPP monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment 80:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner DP, Urbanski S, Bremer D, Wofsy SC, Meyers T, Gower ST, Gregory M (2003) A cross-biome comparison of daily light use efficiency for gross primary production. Global Change Biology 9:383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt DH, Halsey LA, Bauer IE, Campbell C (2000) Spatial and temporal trends in carbon storage of peatlands of continental western Canada through the Holocene. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 37:683–693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Wu J, Lafleur PM, Luan J, Chen H, Zhu X (2018) Can abandoned peatland pasture sequestrate more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than an adjacent pristine bog in Newfoundland, Canada? Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 248:91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring R, Law B, Goulden ML, Bassow SL, McCreight RW, Wofsy S, Bazzaz FA (1995) Scaling gross ecosystem production at Harvard Forest with remote-sensing – a comparison of estimates from a constrained Quantum-Use Efficiency Model and eddy-correlation. Plant, Cell & Environment 18(10):1201–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Roulet NT (2014) Climate change reduces the capacity of northern peatlands to absorb the atmospheric carbon dioxide: the different responses of bogs and fens. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 28(10):1005–1024. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan W, Liu S, Zhou G, Zhou G, Tieszen LL, Baldocchi D, Bernhofer C, Gholz H, Goldstein AH, Goulden ML, Hollinger DY, Hu Y, Law BE, Stoy PC, Vesala T, Wofsy SC (2007) Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 143:189–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible by the support of the following funding to J. Wu: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)-Discovery Grant, Canada Foundation for Innovation-John R. Evans Leaders Fund, Research & Development Corporation (RDC, NL)- Leverage R&D, RDC-Ignite R&D, RDC-RCRI (Regional Collaborative Research Initiative), Humber River Basin Research Initiative of NL, Vice-President Research Fund, Seed Bridge Fund of Memorial University, and the Graduate Student Stipend funding from the Institute for Biodiversity, Ecosystem Science, and Sustainability (IBES, NL). We would like to thank Dr. Muhammad Nadeem, Dr. Mumtaz Cheema, and Mr. Waqas Ali for their comments, and Ms. Beverly Young for her English editing on the first draft of this manuscript. The constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers significantly improved our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianghua Wu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Gillani, S.S.M. & Wang, M. The Difference in Light use Efficiency between an Abandoned Peatland Pasture and an Adjacent Boreal Bog in Western Newfoundland, Canada . Wetlands 40, 733–743 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01224-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01224-0

Key words

Navigation