Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Waterbird Use of Sheetwater Wetlands in Iowa’s Prairie Pothole Region

  • Iowa Farmed Wetlands
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large expanses of land across midcontinental North America have been heavily modified by installation of artificial drainage to convert prairie pothole wetlands into tillable areas. Drained potholes are observed as sheetwater wetlands in agricultural fields, are valued by migratory waterbirds, and have only been studied in limited contexts. We evaluated the use of agricultural sheetwater to migratory waterbirds in Iowa’s Prairie Pothole Region and hypothesized that wetland size would be an important predictor of waterbird use. We observed 1913 unique wetlands and documented waterbird use on 31 % of observations of those wetlands. The most frequently detected waterbirds were Killdeer, Mallard, Blue-winged Teal, and Lesser Yellowlegs. Wetland size had a positive effect (P <0.05) on waterbird species richness and abundance. The findings from this study will help inform future decisions on drainage practices and their impact on wildlife and indicate the need to examine this habitat type at larger temporal and spatial scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anteau MJ (2012) Do interactions of land use and climate affect productivity of waterbirds and prairie-pothole wetlands? Wetlands 32(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzel C, Emberg J, Guillemain M (2006) Ecology of spring-migrating anatidae: a review. Journal of Ornithology 147:167–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarre GA, Bolen EG (1994) Waterfowl ecology and management. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer HL (2004) Hawth's analysis tools for ArcGIS. Available at <http://www.spatialecology.com/htools>. Accessed 15 Jan 2011

  • Bibbey CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques, 2nd edn. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Phillips D (2004) Assessment of CREP wetland habitat quality for wildlife. Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report, Champaign

  • Brown S, Hickey C, Harrington B, Gill R (eds) (2001) The U.S. shorebird conservation plan, 2nd edn. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Manomet

    Google Scholar 

  • Casio Computer Company LTD (2010). Hybrid-GPS: EX-H20G. Available at http://www.casio-intl.com/asia-mea/en/dc/ex_h20g/spec/. Accessed 14 Feb 2011

  • Colwell MA (2010) Shorebird ecology, conservation and management. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (1990) Wetlands losses in the United States 1780’s to 1980’s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2000) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore SJ, Skagen SK, Helmers DL (1999) Shorebirds: an overview for the prairie pothole joint venture. Prairie Pothole Joint Venture, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2006) ArcGIS desktop: release 9. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss NH Jr, Mushet DM (1999) Influence of agriculture on aquatic invertebrate communities of temporary wetlands in the prairie pothole region of North Dakota, USA. Wetlands 19:578–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer AH, Parent AH (1997) Effects of the landscape on shorebird movements at spring migration stopovers. Condor 99:698–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmin LTD (2009) Garmin products: GPSMap 76. Garmin International, Olathe

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977) The ecology of the Wash. III. Density-related behavior and the possible effects of loss of feeding groups on wading birds (Charadrii). Journal of Applied Ecology 14:721–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1979) Role of winter food supplies in the ecology of common British wading birds. Verhandlungen der ornithologischen Gesellschaft in Bayern 23:125–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell R (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2001) EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 7.0 Acquired Intelligence, Inc. & Kesey-Bear. Available at http://www.uvm.edu/~ngotelli/EcoSim/EcoSim.html

  • Haig SM, Mehlman DW, Oring LW (2008) Avian movements and wetland connectivity in landscape conservation. Conservation Biology 12(4):749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmers DL (1992) Shorebird management manual. Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network, Manomet

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill D, Fasham M, Tucker G, Shewry M, Shaw P (2005) Handbook of biodiversity methods: survey, evaluation, and monitoring. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iowa Association of Naturalists (IAN) (2001) Iowa Wetlands. Available at http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/IAN204.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2011

  • Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship (IDALS) (2010) Iowa wetlands landscape systems initiative work plan. Available at http://www.iowalandscapeinitiative.com/pdf/IWLSIPlanofWork.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2011

  • Kenne MC (2006) Shorebird usage of spring sheet-water pools. Iowa Ornithologists’ Union 76:179

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent TH, Dinsmore JJ (1996) Birds in Iowa. Thomson-Shore, Inc., Dexter

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp NF (2001) Migrant shorebird, breeding waterfowl, and invertebrate response to conditions in temporary wetlands in east central South Dakota during spring. South Dakota State University, M.S. thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvist A, Lindström Å (2003) Gluttony in migratory waders: unprecedented energy assimilation rates in vertebrates. Oikos 101:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaGrange TG, Dinsmore JJ (1989) Habitat use by mallards during spring migration through central Iowa. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:1076–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström A (1995) Stopover ecology of migrating birds: some unsolved questions. Israeli Journal of Zoology 41:407–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Love O (2014) Iowa farms with good drainage systems did well in drought. The Gazette. Available via http://thegazette.com/2013/01/09/iowa-farms-with-good-drainage-systems-did-well-in-drought/. Accessed 25 Jan 2015

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography, vol 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley LA, Anteau MJ, van der Burg MP, Wiltermuth MT (2015) Land use and wetland drainage affect water levels and dynamics of remaining wetlands. Ecosphere 6(6):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller BA, Crumpton WG, van der Valk AG (2009) Spatial distribution of historical wetland classes on the Des Moines Lobe, Iowa. Wetlands 29:1146–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers JP, Morrison RIG, Antas PZ, Harrington BA, Love-joy TE, Sallaberry M, Senner SE, Tarak A (1987) Conservation strategy for migratory species. American Scientist 75:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2015). Climatological rankings. National Climatic Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/climatological-rankings/. Accessed 20 Mar 2015.

  • Niemuth ND, Estey ME, Reynolds RE, Loesch CR, Meeks WA (2006) Use of wetlands by spring-migrant shorebirds in agricultural landscapes of North Dakota's Drift Prairie. Wetlands 26:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara RB, Kotze DJ (2010) Do not log-transform count data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1:118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal BJ, Heske EJ, Stafford JD (2008) Waterbird response to wetlands restored through the conservation reserve enhancement program. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72:654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Playck JS Jr, Harrington BA (2004) Prey abundance and habitat use by migratory shorebirds at coastal stopover sites in Connecticut. Journal of Field Ornithology 75:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, FW (1962) The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I. Ecology 43:185–215 and 431–432

  • PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University (2006) Average annual precipitation, 1971–2000 Iowa. Available at http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/state_products/?id=IA. Accessed 16 Feb 2011

  • Recher HF (1966) Some aspects of the ecology of migrant shorebirds. Ecology 47:393–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safran RJ, Isola CR, Colwell MA, Williams OE (1997) Benthic invertebrates at foraging locations of nine waterbird species in managed wetlands of the northern San Joaquin Valley, California. Wetlands 17:407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider DC, Harrington BA (1981) Timing of shorebird migration in relation to prey depletion. Auk 98:801–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Skagen SK (1997) Stopover ecology of transitory populations: the case of migrant shorebirds. Ecological Studies 125:244–269

  • Skagen SK, Knopf FL (1993) Toward conservation of midcontinental shorebird migrations. Conservation Biology 7:533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skagen SK, Knopf FL (1994) Residency patterns of migrating sandpipers at a midcontinental stopover. Condor 96:944–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft OW, Haig SM (2005) The value of agricultural wetlands as invertebrate resources for wintering shorebirds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:249–256

  • Van der Valk AG (2005) The prairie potholes of North America. In: Fraser LH, Keddy PA (eds) The world’s largest wetlands: ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 393–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Watershed Boundary Dataset for Iowa. Available at http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed 10 Oct 2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the US Environmental Protection Agency for funding this study, and Iowa Department of Natural Resources staff (V Evelsizer and KE Kinkead) and K Schilling of the Iowa Geological Survey for their assistance with planning and implementation of this study. J Newton, A Furman, A DeRubeis, and M Garrick assisted with fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin T. Murphy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, K.T., Dinsmore, S.J. Waterbird Use of Sheetwater Wetlands in Iowa’s Prairie Pothole Region. Wetlands 38, 211–219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0706-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0706-7

Keywords

Navigation