Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hydroregime Prediction Models for Ephemeral Groundwater-Driven Sinkhole Wetlands: a Planning Tool for Climate Change and Amphibian Conservation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydroregimes of ephemeral wetlands affect reproductive success of many amphibian species and are sensitive to altered weather patterns associated with climate change. We used 17 years of weekly temperature, precipitation, and water-depth measurements for eight small, ephemeral, groundwater-driven sinkhole wetlands in Florida sandhills to develop a hydroregime predictive model. To illustrate its utility for climate-change planning, we forecasted weekly wetland water-depths and hydroperiods (2012–2060) using our model and downscaled climate data from the CSIRO Mk3.5 Global Circulation Model under an A1B emissions scenario. We then examined how forecasted water depths and hydroperiods might alter reproductive success, and thereby populations, of five anuran species. Precipitation and water-depth from the prior week were significant predictors of water depth. Our model forecasted shallower depths and shortened hydroperiods for most wetlands when used with the CSIRO Mk3.5 A1B scenario. The forecasted hydroregimes would likely provide adequate reproductive opportunity for only one of the five species we examined. We demonstrate the utility of our model in examining how different climate-change scenarios might affect hydroregimes and, indirectly, biological diversity. Climate change uncertainty highlights the importance of retaining multiple, hydrologically diverse wetlands on landscapes to maximize the potential for successful reproduction by species having differing hydroregime requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashton RE Jr, Ashton PS (1988) Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida, part three: the amphibians. Windward Publishing, Inc., Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydelott DG, Bullock HC, Furman AL, White HW, Spieth JW (1975) Soil survey of Ocala national forest area, Florida. United States Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt KJ (2002) The relative importance of wetland size and hydroperiod for amphibians in southern New Hampshire. Wetlands 13:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt KJ, Baber MJ, Tarr TL (2003) Patterns of larval amphibian distribution along a wetland hydroperiod gradient. Canadian Journal of Zoology 81:1539–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee TJC (1995) Amphibian breeding and climate. Nature 374:219–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Belden LK, Olson DH, Green DM, Root TL, Kiesecker JM (2001) Amphibian breeding and climate change. Conservation Biology 15:1804–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Walls SC, Bancroft BA, Lawler JJ, Searle CL, Gervasi SS (2010) Direct and indirect effects of climate change on amphibian populations. Diversity 2010(2):281–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brendonck L, Michels E, De Meester L, Riddich B (2002) Temporary pools are not ‘enemy free’. Hydrobiologica 486:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RT (2005) A review of basin morphology and pool hydrology of isolated ponded wetlands: implications for seasonal forest pools of the northeastern United States. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RT (2009) Potential impacts of global climate change on the hydrology and ecology of ephemeral freshwater systems of the forests of the northeastern United States. Climatic Change 95:469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corn PS (2005) Climate change and amphibians. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 28:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon H, O’Farrell S, Collier M, Dix M, Rotstayn L, Kowalczyk E, Hirst T, Watterson I (2010) The CSIRO Mk3.5 climate model. Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research. CAWCR Technical Report No. 021

  • Greenberg CH (2001) Spatio-temporal dynamics of pond use and recruitment in Florida gopher frogs (Rana capito aesopus). Journal of Herpetology 35:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CH, Tanner GW (2004) Breeding pond selection and movement patterns by eastern spadefoot toads (Scaphiopus holbrookii) in relation to weather and edaphic conditions. Journal of Herpetology 38:569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CH, Tanner GW (2005a) Spatial and temporal ecology of eastern spadefoot toads on a Florida landscape. Herpetologica 61:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CH, Tanner GW (2005b) Spatial and temporal ecology of oak toads (Bufo quercicus) on a Florida landscape. Herpetologica 61:422–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CH, Perry RW, Franzreb KE, Loeb SC, Saenz D, Rudolph DC (2014) Climate change and wildlife in the southern United States: potential effects and management options. In: Vose JM, Klepzig KD (eds) Climate change adaptation and mitigation management options. CRC Press, New York, pp 379–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JA, Neary VS, Morgan KL (2006) Hydrologic modeling as a development tool for HGM functional assessment models. Wetlands 26:161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson M (2007) ‘ANUSPLIN Version 4.37 Users Guide’. http://fennerschool.anu.edu.au/files/anusplin437.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2014

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. 52 pp. Download from: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4/syr.pdf

  • Jiang J (2010) Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalisz PJ, Stone EL (1984) The longleaf pine islands of the Ocala National Forest, Florida: a soil study. Ecology 65:1743–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press (online at www.globalchange.gov/usimpacts)

  • Knowles L Jr, O’Reilly AM, Adamski JC (2002) Hydrogeology and simulated effects of the ground-water withdrawals from the Floridan aquifer system in lake county and in the Ocala National Forest and vicinity, north-central Florida. US Geological Society Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4207

  • Kosa P (2011) The effect of temperature on actual evapotranspiration based on landsat 5 TM satellite imagery. In: Labedzki L (ed), Evapotranspiration, pp 209–228. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/evapotranspiration/the-effect-of-temperature-on-actualevapotranspiration-based-on-landsat-5-tm-satellite-imagery

  • Mansell RS, Bloom SA, Sun G (2000) A model for wetland hydrology: description and validation. Soil Science 165:384–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moler PE, Franz R (1987) Wildlife values of small, isolated wetlands in the southeastern coastal plain. In: Odum RR, Riddleberger KA, Ozier JC (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd Southeastern Nongame and endangered wildlife symposium. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Atlanta, pp 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: A special report of working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/emission/index.htm. Accessed 9 Dec 2010

  • NOAA (2013) http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/climate-normals. Accessed 8/19/2013

  • Pechmann JHK, Scott DE, Gibbons JW, Semlitsch RD (1989) Influence of wetland and hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecology and Management 1:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saenz D, Fitzgerald LA, Baum KA, Conner RN (2006) Abiotic correlates of anuran calling phenology: the importance of rain, temperature, and season. Herpetological Monographs 20:64–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2009) SAS/STAT® 9.2 user’s guide, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (1998) Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology 12:1129–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass JW, Komoroski MJ, Bryan AL Jr, Burger J (2000a) Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14:414–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass JW, Bryan AL Jr, Burger J (2000b) Development of expectations of larval amphibian assemblage structure in southeastern depression wetlands. Ecological Applications 10:1219–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Callahan TJ, Pyzoha JE, Trettin CC (2006) Modeling the climatic and subsurface stratigraphy controls on the hydrology of a Carolina bay wetland in South Carolina, USA. Wetlands 26:567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd BD, Scott DE, Pechmann JH, Gibbons JW (2011) Climate change correlates with rapid delays and advancements in reproductive timing in an amphibian community. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278:2191–2197

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walls SC, Barichivich WJ, Brown ME, Scott DE, Hossack BR (2013a) Influence of drought on salamander occupancy of isolated wetlands on the southeastern coastal plain of the United States. Wetlands 33:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls SC, Barichivich WJ, Brown ME, Scott DE, Hossack BT (2013b) Influence of drought on salamander occupancy of isolated wetlands on the southeastern coastal plain of the United States. Wetlands 33:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wear DN, Huggett R, Greis JG (2013) Constructing alternative futures. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds), The southern forest futures project: technical report, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report SRS-178, Asheville, pp 11–26

  • Winsberg MD (1990) Florida weather. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler PH (2003) Vernal pools and the concept of “isolated wetlands”. Wetlands 23:597–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the USDA Forest Service Ocala National Forest; Longleaf Pine Ecosystem Restoration Program; Southern Research Station; Southern Region (R8); Department of Energy-Savannah River Operations (IA Agreement DE-AI09-76SR00056); and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (contracts NG99-014 and C1195). We thank J. Beach, S. Wazny, D. Wooten, R. Ashton, M. Welker, J. Smith, J. Staiger, J. Barichivich, R. Owen, D. Johnson, S. Johnson, J. Wiebe, K. Garren, E. Roznik, T. Sheltra, R. Ashton, S. Doucette-Riisse, C.J. Kovach, C. Bugbee, R. Lara, L. Tirado, and I. Luque for fieldwork. We also thank L. Lowery, R. Lowery, C. Sekerak, J. Hinchee, J. Clutts, J. Marr, M. Clere, M. Herrin, and the fire crew for assistance. We thank several anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor for Wetlands for their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bent Creek Experimental Forest, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Upland Hardwood Ecology and Management RWU-4157, 1577 Brevard Road, Asheville, NC, 28807, USA

    C. H. Greenberg

  2. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Center for Forest Disturbance Science RWU-4156, 320 Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    S. Goodrick

  3. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 110 Newins Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    J. D. Austin

  4. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA

    B. R. Parresol

Authors
  1. C. H. Greenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Goodrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. D. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. R. Parresol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. H. Greenberg.

Additional information

B. R. Parresol is deceased.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greenberg, C.H., Goodrick, S., Austin, J.D. et al. Hydroregime Prediction Models for Ephemeral Groundwater-Driven Sinkhole Wetlands: a Planning Tool for Climate Change and Amphibian Conservation. Wetlands 35, 899–911 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0680-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0680-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation