Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards organizing smart collaboration and enhancing teamwork performance: a GA-supported system oriented to mobile learning through cloud-based online course

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At present, people’s learning styles become diverse, for which mobile learning is a significant trend that enables distributed learners to achieve collaborative learning and allows them to be engaged in virtual teams to work together. In this research, we develop a system to cope with the problem in current mobile learning circumstance, where learners in virtual teams generally lack proper communications, guidance and assistances between each other. Following the theory of Kolb team learning experience, we use our system, Teamwork as a Service (TaaS), to work in conjunction with cloud-based learning management systems. This system targets at organizing a series of learning activities and then forming a learning flow in order to allow learners to participate into smart collaborations. Executing the five web services of TaaS sequentially, learners can have their collaborative learning arranged in a better environment, where they are able to know about one another, be grouped into cloud-based ‘Jigsaw Classroom’, plan and publish tasks and supervise other learners mutually. In particular, one primary point of enhancing learners’ teamwork performance is to offer them computational choice of task allocation. For this reason, we model the social features related to the collaborative learning activities, and introduce a genetic algorithm (GA) approach to group learners into appropriate teams with two different team formation scenarios. The technical details of the operation principle of GA are illustrated thoroughly. Finally, experimental results are presented to prove our approach is workable to facilitate teamwork with considerations of learner’s capabilities and preferences. We also demonstrate our implementation details of the newly designed TaaS over the Amazon cloud and discuss the main improvements for collaborative learning brought by TaaS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharples M, Corlett D, Westmancott O (2002) The design and implementation of a mobile learning resource. Pers Ubiquit Comput 6(3):220–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wentling TL, Waight C, Gallaher J, Fleur J, Wang C, Kanfer A (2000) E-learning: a review of literature knowledge and learning systems group. NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moodle (2013). https://moodle.org/

  4. Blackboard (2013). http://www.blackboard.com/International/APAC/ Overview.aspx

  5. Docebo (2013). http://www.docebo.com

  6. Mell P, Grance T (2009) Draft NIST working definition of cloud computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vouk MA (2008) Cloud computing-issues, research and implementations. J Comput Inf Technol 16(4):235–246

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SH, Mims C, Holmes KP (2006) An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education. Assoc Adv Comput Educ J 14(1):77–100

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bermejo S (2005) Cooperative electronic learning in virtual laboratories through forums. IEEE Trans Educ 48(1):140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baskerville R, Nandhakumar J (2007) Activating and perpetuating virtual teams: now that we are mobile, where do we go? IEEE Trans Prof Commun 50(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kayes AB, Kayes DC, Kolb DA (2005) Developing teams using the Kolb team learning experience. Simul Gaming 36(3):355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang FY, Carley KM, Zeng D, Mao W (2007) Social computing: from social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Trans Intell Syst 22(2):79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dron J, Anderson T (2007) Collectives, networks and groups in social software for E-learning. Paper presented at the world conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (ELEARN), Quebec City, Canada

  14. Law N, Miyake N, Looi CK, Vuorikari R, Punie Y, Linn M (2013) Are CSCL and learning sciences research relevant to large-scale educational reform? Paper presented at the 10th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL), Madison, USA

  15. Kirschner PA, Erkens G (2013) Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educ Psychol 48(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liao J, Wang M (2011) A collaborative learning system based on cloud and e-commerce. Paper presented at the 8th IEEE international conference on e-business engineering, Beijing, China

  17. Downes S (2006) Learning network and connective knowledge. IT Forum in Miscellaneous Publications, University of Geogia

    Google Scholar 

  18. Popov V, Noroozi O, Barrett JB, Bieman HJA, Teasley SD, Slof B, Mulder M (2014) Perceptions and experiences of, and outcomes for, university students in culturally diversified dyads in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Comput Hum Behav 32:186–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wellman B, Salaff J, Dimitrova D, Garton L, Gulia M, Haythornthwaite C (2001) Computer networks as social networks: collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Science 293(14):2031–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sobrero PM (2008) Social learning through virtual teams and communities. J Ext 46(3). http://www.joe.org/joe/2008june/a1.php

  21. Saunders CS, Ahuja MK (2006) Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and on-going distributed teams. Small Group Res 37(6):662–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ebrahim NA, Ahmed S, Taha Z (2009) Virtual teams: a literature review. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3(3):2653–2669

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schwabe G, Goth C, Frohberg D (2005) Does team size matter in mobile learning. Paper presented at the international conference on mobile business (ICMB), Sydney, Australia

  24. Wu T, Liu D, Bi X (2006) Team learning orientation and conflicts influence team performance in different task difficulties. Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on advanced management science, Chengdu, China

  25. Franzoni AL, Assar S (2009) Student learning styles adaptation method based on teaching strategies and electronic media. Educ Technol Soc 12(4):15–29

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koh E, Lim J (2012) Too early, too bad: uncovering and understanding the initial participation para-dox in technology-mediated learning teams. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 55(1):55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Feldmann B (2006) Group types in e-learning environments-study team, working team and learning team. Paper presented at the 7th international conference on information technology based higher education and training (ITHET), Ultimo, Australia

  28. Pinola M (2011) Mobile collaboration and community tools for virtual teams. In: Woodill G (ed) The mobile learning edge. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for disappeared collaboration. Org Sci 12(3):346–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharples M, Arnedillo-Sanchez I, Milrad M, Vavoula G (2009) Mobile learning. Technology-enhanced learning. Springer, Berlin, pp 233–249

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. RW3 Culture Wizard (2010) The challenges of working in virtual teams. Virtual Team Survey Report, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kukulska-Hulme A, Sharples M, Milrad M, Arnedilo-Sanchez I, Vavou-la G (2013) Innovation in mobile learning: a European perspective. IJMBL 1(1):13–35

    Google Scholar 

  33. Raschick M, Maypole DE, Day PA (1998) Improving field education through Kolb’s learning theory. J Soc Work Educ 34(1):34–42

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jones C, Reichard C, Mokhtar K (2003) Are students’ learning styles discipline specific? Commun Coll J Res Pract 27(5):363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Terrell SR, Dringus L (2000) An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in an online learning environment. J Educ Technol Syst 28(3):231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Richmond AS, Cummings R (2005) Implementing Kolb’s learning styles into online distance education. Int J Technol Teach Learn 1(1):45–54

    Google Scholar 

  37. Anagnostopoulos A, Becchetti L, Castillo C, Gionis A, Leonardi S (2012) Online team formation in social networks. World Wide Web, Lyon, France

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Vidyarthi DP, Tripathi AK, Sarker B, Yang LT (2009) GA based task allocation models. In: Scheduling in distributed computing systems-analysis, design and models. Springer, Berlin

  39. Page AJ, Keane TM, Naughton TJ (2010) Multi-heuristic dynamic task allocation using genetic algorithms in a heterogeneous distributed system. J Parallel Distrib Comput 70(7):758–766

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Wi H, Oh S, Mun J, Jung M (2009) A team formation model based on knowledge and collaboration. Expert Syst Appl Int J 36(5):9121–9134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tam V, Lam EY, Fung ST (2012) Toward a complete e-learning system framework for semantic analysis, concept clustering and learning path optimization. Paper presented at the 12th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, Roma, Italy

  42. Chen C-J (2012) Structural vibration suppression by using neural classifier with genetic algorithm. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 3(3):215–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Boehm O, Hardoon DR, Manevitz LM (2011) Classifying cognitive states of brain activity via one-class neural networks with feature selection by genetic algorithms. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 2(3):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang X-Z, He Q, Chen D, Yeung D (2005) A genetic algorithm for solving the inverse problem of support vector machines. Neurocomputing 68:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu J, Li X, Shen W (2011) Effective genetic algorithm for resource-constrained project scheduling with limited preemptions. Int J Mach Learn Cybernet 2(2):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fransen J, Weinberger A, Paul A (2013) Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educ Psychol 48(1):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liao J, Wang M (2011) A collaborative learning system based on cloud and e-commerce. Paper presented at the 8th IEEE international conference on e-business engineering, Beijing, China

  48. Lee KB, Salman R (2012) The design and development of mobile collaborative learning application using android. J Inf Technol Appl Educ 1(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bochicchio MA, Longo A (2011) Collaborative web labs as a service: challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the 41st ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Rapid City, USA

  50. Al-Hmouz A, Shen J, Yan J, Al-Hmouz R (2010) Enhanced learner model for adaptive mobile learning. Paper presented at the international conference on information integration and web-based applications and services, ACM, USA, pp 781–784

  51. Al-Hmouz A, Shen J, Yan J (2009) A machine learning based framework for adaptive mobile learning. Paper presented at the international conference on web-based learning, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 34–43

  52. Al-Hmouz A, Shen J, Al-Hmouz R, Yan J (2012) Modelling and simulation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for mobile learning. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 5(3):226–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Chatti MA (2012) Collaboration in mobile learning. Report of computer-supported learning research group. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gao H, Baylor A, Shen E (2005) Designer support for online collaboration and knowledge construction. Educ Technol Soc 8(1):69–79

    Google Scholar 

  55. Singh S, Rylander DH, Mims TC (2012) Efficiency of online vs. offline learning: a comparison of inputs and outcomes. Int J Bus Humanit Technol 2(1):93–98

    Google Scholar 

  56. Trifonova A, Ronchetti M (2006) Mobile learning: is anytime + anywhere = always online? Paper presented at the 6th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, Kerkrade, Netherlands

  57. Attewell J (2005) A technology update and m-learning project summary. Mobile technology and learning. Learning and Skills Development Agency, UK

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wu H, Hamdi L, Mahe N (2010) Tango: a flexible mobility-enabled architecture for online and offline mobile enterprise applications. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on mobile data management, Kansas City, MO, USA

  59. Chua FF, Tay ES (2012) Developing virtual learning environment 2.0 using web services apporach. Paper presented at the 12th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), Rome, Italy

  60. Cao XM, Zhao P, Wang X (2009) Study on design and development e-learning system based on learning flow. Paper presented at the world congress on software engineering (WCSE), China

  61. Aronson E, Blaney N, Steophan C, Sikes J, Snapp M (1978) The Jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  62. Millis BJ, Cottell PG (1998) Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Oryx Press, Phoenix

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wang C (2009) The development of collaborative learning environment with learning blogs. J Softw 4(2):1796217x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Thiele JE (2003) Learning patterns of online students. J Nurs Educ 42(8):364–367

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning: experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kolb AD (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manag Learn Educ 4(2):193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Belbin R (1993) Team roles at work. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  68. Loo R (2004) Kolb’s learning styles and learning preferences: is there a linkage. Educ Psychol 24(1):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lingard R, Barkataki S (2011) Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science. Paper presented at the 41st ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Rapid City, USA

  70. Lingard R (2009) Teaching and assessing teamwork in engineering and computer science. Paper presented at the international symposium on engineering education and educational technologies (EEET), Orlando, USA

  71. Richmond AS, Cummings R (2005) Implementing Kolb’s learning styles into online distance education. Int J Technol Teach Learn 1(1):45–54

    Google Scholar 

  72. Anagnostopoulos A, Becchetti L, Castillo C, Gionis A, Leonardi S (2012) Online team formation in social networks. World Wide Web, Lyon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. Andrew JP, Thomas MK, Thomas JN (2010) Multi-heuristic dynamic task allocation using genetic algorithms in a heterogeneous distributed system. J Parallel Distrib Comput 70:758–766

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sun G, Shen J (2013) Facilitating collaborative learning in TaaS: a mobile cloud system for enhancing teamwork performance. Paper presented at the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Manchester, UK

  76. Sun G, Shen J (2013) Teamwork as a service: a cloud based system for enhancing teamwork performance in mobile learning. Paper presented at the 13th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), Beijing, China

  77. Sun G, Shen J (2014) Collaborative learning through TaaS: a mobile system for courses over the cloud. Paper accepted by the 14th IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT), Athens, Greece

  78. Sadler PM, Good E (2006) The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educ Assess 11(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Systems and Technology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia

    Geng Sun & Jun Shen

Authors
  1. Geng Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geng Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, G., Shen, J. Towards organizing smart collaboration and enhancing teamwork performance: a GA-supported system oriented to mobile learning through cloud-based online course. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 7, 391–409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0269-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-014-0269-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation