Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of plant growth regulators and light intensity on the micropropagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Mejhoul

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the best combination of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and light intensity in order to improve organogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivar Mejhoul. Organogenic cultures obtained from shoot tip explants were cultured on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS/2) medium supplemented with various combinations of two auxins: 2-naphthoxyacetic acid (NOAA) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) at 0, 0.2, or 0.4 mg L−1and two cytokinins: kinetin and 6-(dimethylallylamino) purine (2iP) at 0, 0.4, or 0.8 mg L−1 under different light intensities. Our results revealed that after 3 months of culture, the combination of 0.2 mg L−1 NOAA, 0.2 mg L−1 IAA, 0.4 mg L−1 2iP, and 0.4 mg L−1 kinetin was the optimal for shoot proliferation (12.8 shoot buds per explant), with low levels of hyperhydricity (20.0%), tissue browning (20.0%), and precocious rooting (30.0%). The present study showed also that darkness and low light intensity (500 lux) significantly increased the incidence of precocious rooting while high light intensities (2,000 – 3,000 lux) decreased shoot bud proliferation and stimulated shoot elongation and greening. The optimal light intensity during the multiplication phase was 1,000 lux (13.2 shoot buds per explant, 15.0% greening, 25.0% precocious rooting). Shoot elongation and rooting occurred on PGR-free MS/2 medium then the plantlets were transferred to a greenhouse where 88.0% survived after 3 months. Our results are beneficial for the efficient and large-scale propagation of the elite and endangered date palm cultivar Mejhoul.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2iP:

6-(dimethylallylamino) purine

IAA:

indole-3-acetic acid

MS:

Murashige and Skoog

NOAA:

2-naphthoxyacetic acid

PGR:

plant growth regulator

References

  • Abahmane L. 2011. Date palm micropropagation via organogenesis, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 69–90

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Abohatem M, Zouine J, El Hadrami I. 2011. Low concentrations of BAP and high rate of subcultures improve the establishment and multiplication of somatic embryos in date palm suspension cultures by limiting oxidative browning associated with high levels of total phenols and peroxidase activities. Sci. Horticul. 130: 344–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyu AB, Musa AM, Ibrahim MA, Ibrahim H, Oyewale AO. 2009. Preliminary phytochemical screening and antioxidant activity of leave extract of albizia chevalieri harms (leguminoseae-mimosoideae). Bayero J. Pure App. Sci. 2: 149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Khalifah NS, Skari E, Shanavaskhan AE. 2013. Date Palm Tissue Culture and Genetical Identification of Cultivars Grown in Saudi Arabia. KACST Press, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, pp 220

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Khateeb AA. 2008. The problems facing the use of tissue culture technique in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Sci. J. King Faisal Univ. 9: 85–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Khateeb AA, Alturki SM. 2014. A comparison of liquid and semi-solid cultures on shoot multiplication and rooting of three date palm cultivars (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in vitro. Adv. Env. Biol. 8: 263–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mayahi AMW. 2014. Thidiazuron-induced in vitro bud organogenesis of the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Hillawi. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 13: 3581–3590

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anjarne M, Abahmane L, Bougerfaoui M. 2005. Les techniques de micropropagation du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.): Expérience de l’INRA–Maroc. Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Développement Agricole Durable des Systèmes Oasiens. Morocco, pp 86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Anjarne M, Zaid A. 1993. Effets de certains équilibres hormonaux sur l’enracinement précoce destissus du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Al Awamia 82: 197–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam J, Khan SA. 2009. In vitro micropropagation of Khalas date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.), an important fruit plant. J. Fruit Orn. Plant Res. 17: 15–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchesne G. 1983. Vegetative propagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by in vitro culture. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Date Palm. King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, pp 698–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchesne G, Zaid A, Rhiss A. 1986. Meristematic potentialities of bottom of young leaves to rapidly propagate date palm. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Date Palm. King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, pp 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekheet SA. 2013. Direct organogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) for propagation of true-to-type plants. Sci. Agri. 4: 85–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouguerfaoui M, Zaid A. 1993. Effet de la teneur du milieu de culture en ammoniaque sur la vitrification des tissus du palmier dattier cultivés in vitro. Al Awamia 82: 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousselmame F, Kenny L, Chlyah H. 2001. Optimisation des conditions de culture pour l’enracinement in vitro de l’arganier (Argania spinosa L.). Life Sci. 324: 995–1000

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fki L, Masmoudi R, Kriaã W, Mahjoub A, Sghaier B, Mzid R, Mliki A, Rival A, Drira N. 2011. Date palm micropropagation via somatic embryogenesis, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47–68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschlag F. 1982. Factors affecting establishment and growth of peach shoots in vitro. HortScience 17: 85–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Bi T. 2012. Direct shoot regeneration system for date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Dhakki as a means of micropropagation. Pak. J. Bot. 44: 1965–1971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khierallah HSM, Bader SM. 2007. Micropropagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) var. Maktoom through direct organogenesis. Acta Hort. 736: 213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konieczny R, Sliwinska E, Pilarska M, Tuleja M. 2012. Morphohistological and flow cytometric analyses of somatic embryogenesis in Trifolium nigrescens Viv. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 109: 131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loutfi K, El Hadrami I. 2005. Phoenix dactilyfera date palm, In RE Litz, ed, Biotechnology of Fruit and Nut Crops. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 144–156

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mager AM, Harel E. 1979. Polyphenol oxidase in plants. Phytochemistry 18: 193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazri MA. 2014. Effects of plant growth regulators and carbon source on shoot proliferation and regeneration in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) ‘16-bis’. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 89: 415–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazri MA. 2015. Role of cytokinins and physical state of the culture medium to improve in vitro shoot multiplication, rooting and acclimatization of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Boufeggous. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 24: 268–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazri MA, Meziani R. 2013. An improved method for micropropagation and regeneration of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 22: 176–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog FA. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Phys. Planta. 15: 473–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro C, Teisson C, Cote F, Ganry J. 1994. Effect of lightintensity and CO2 concentration on growth of banana plants (Musa AAA, cultivar “Petite Naine”) in vitro and subsequentgrowth following acclimatization. Sci. Hortic. 60: 41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal BK, Du G, Zhang Y, Liu J, Shi Q. 2008. Studies on browning problem and phenols content on shoots of Yali, Aikansui and Abbe Fetel pears for in vitro culture. Front. Agri. China 2: 321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulain C, Rhiss A, Beauchesne G. 1979. Multiplication végétative en culture in vitro du palmier dattier. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie d’Agriculture de France 11: 1151–1154

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhiss A, Poulain C, Beauchesne G. 1979. La culture in vitro appliquée à la multiplication du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Fruits 34: 551–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar M. 1989. The role of medium composition and light intensity on in vitro root formation of strawberry. Pak. J. Bot. 21: 24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedra MH. 2005. Phenological descriptors and molecular markers for the determination of true-to-type of tissue culture-derived plants using organogenesis of some Moroccan date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties. Al Awamia 113: 85–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedra MH. 2011. Development of new Moroccan selected date palm varieties resistant to bayoud and of good fruit quality, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 513–531

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sengar K, Sengar RS, Garg SK. 2011. The effect of in-vitro environmental conditions on somesugarcane varieties for micropropagation. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10: 17122–17126

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegien I. 2013. Light affects in vitro organogenesis of Linum usitatissimum L. and its cyanogenic potential. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35: 781–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Patel RM. 2014. Factors influencing in vitro growth and shoot multiplication of pomegranate. Bioscan 9: 1031–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Skribanek A, Solymosi K, Hideg E, Böddi B. 2012. The effect of abiotic stressors (light and temperature) on chlorophyll biosynthesis. International Scientific Conference on Sustainable Development and Ecological Footprint, Sopron, Hungary, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha HS, Bekheet SA, Saker MM. 2001. Factors affecting in vitro multiplication of date palm. Biol. Plant 44: 431–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaid A, El-Korchi B, Visser HJ. 2011. Commercial date palm tissue culture procedures and facility establishment, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zaid A, Tisserat B. 1983. In vitro shoot tip differentiation in Phoenix dactylifera L. Date Palm J. 2: 163–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DW, Yuan S, Xu F, Zhu F, Yuan M, Ye HX, Guo HQ, Lv X, Yin Y, Lin HH. 2014. Light intensity affects chlorophyll synthesis during greening process by metabolite signal from mitochondrial alternative oxidase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Env. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12438

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reda Meziani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meziani, R., Jaiti, F., Mazri, M.A. et al. Effects of plant growth regulators and light intensity on the micropropagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Mejhoul. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 18, 325–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-015-0062-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-015-0062-4

Keywords

Navigation