Abstract
The present study aimed to determine the best combination of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and light intensity in order to improve organogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivar Mejhoul. Organogenic cultures obtained from shoot tip explants were cultured on half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS/2) medium supplemented with various combinations of two auxins: 2-naphthoxyacetic acid (NOAA) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) at 0, 0.2, or 0.4 mg L−1and two cytokinins: kinetin and 6-(dimethylallylamino) purine (2iP) at 0, 0.4, or 0.8 mg L−1 under different light intensities. Our results revealed that after 3 months of culture, the combination of 0.2 mg L−1 NOAA, 0.2 mg L−1 IAA, 0.4 mg L−1 2iP, and 0.4 mg L−1 kinetin was the optimal for shoot proliferation (12.8 shoot buds per explant), with low levels of hyperhydricity (20.0%), tissue browning (20.0%), and precocious rooting (30.0%). The present study showed also that darkness and low light intensity (500 lux) significantly increased the incidence of precocious rooting while high light intensities (2,000 – 3,000 lux) decreased shoot bud proliferation and stimulated shoot elongation and greening. The optimal light intensity during the multiplication phase was 1,000 lux (13.2 shoot buds per explant, 15.0% greening, 25.0% precocious rooting). Shoot elongation and rooting occurred on PGR-free MS/2 medium then the plantlets were transferred to a greenhouse where 88.0% survived after 3 months. Our results are beneficial for the efficient and large-scale propagation of the elite and endangered date palm cultivar Mejhoul.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 2iP:
-
6-(dimethylallylamino) purine
- IAA:
-
indole-3-acetic acid
- MS:
-
Murashige and Skoog
- NOAA:
-
2-naphthoxyacetic acid
- PGR:
-
plant growth regulator
References
Abahmane L. 2011. Date palm micropropagation via organogenesis, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 69–90
Abohatem M, Zouine J, El Hadrami I. 2011. Low concentrations of BAP and high rate of subcultures improve the establishment and multiplication of somatic embryos in date palm suspension cultures by limiting oxidative browning associated with high levels of total phenols and peroxidase activities. Sci. Horticul. 130: 344–348
Aliyu AB, Musa AM, Ibrahim MA, Ibrahim H, Oyewale AO. 2009. Preliminary phytochemical screening and antioxidant activity of leave extract of albizia chevalieri harms (leguminoseae-mimosoideae). Bayero J. Pure App. Sci. 2: 149–153
Al Khalifah NS, Skari E, Shanavaskhan AE. 2013. Date Palm Tissue Culture and Genetical Identification of Cultivars Grown in Saudi Arabia. KACST Press, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, pp 220
Al Khateeb AA. 2008. The problems facing the use of tissue culture technique in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Sci. J. King Faisal Univ. 9: 85–104
Al Khateeb AA, Alturki SM. 2014. A comparison of liquid and semi-solid cultures on shoot multiplication and rooting of three date palm cultivars (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in vitro. Adv. Env. Biol. 8: 263–269
Al-Mayahi AMW. 2014. Thidiazuron-induced in vitro bud organogenesis of the date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Hillawi. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 13: 3581–3590
Anjarne M, Abahmane L, Bougerfaoui M. 2005. Les techniques de micropropagation du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.): Expérience de l’INRA–Maroc. Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Développement Agricole Durable des Systèmes Oasiens. Morocco, pp 86–93
Anjarne M, Zaid A. 1993. Effets de certains équilibres hormonaux sur l’enracinement précoce destissus du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Al Awamia 82: 197–211
Aslam J, Khan SA. 2009. In vitro micropropagation of Khalas date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.), an important fruit plant. J. Fruit Orn. Plant Res. 17: 15–27
Beauchesne G. 1983. Vegetative propagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by in vitro culture. Proceedings of the First Symposium on Date Palm. King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, pp 698–700
Beauchesne G, Zaid A, Rhiss A. 1986. Meristematic potentialities of bottom of young leaves to rapidly propagate date palm. Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Date Palm. King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, pp 87–94
Bekheet SA. 2013. Direct organogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) for propagation of true-to-type plants. Sci. Agri. 4: 85–92
Bouguerfaoui M, Zaid A. 1993. Effet de la teneur du milieu de culture en ammoniaque sur la vitrification des tissus du palmier dattier cultivés in vitro. Al Awamia 82: 177–196
Bousselmame F, Kenny L, Chlyah H. 2001. Optimisation des conditions de culture pour l’enracinement in vitro de l’arganier (Argania spinosa L.). Life Sci. 324: 995–1000
Fki L, Masmoudi R, Kriaã W, Mahjoub A, Sghaier B, Mzid R, Mliki A, Rival A, Drira N. 2011. Date palm micropropagation via somatic embryogenesis, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47–68
Hammerschlag F. 1982. Factors affecting establishment and growth of peach shoots in vitro. HortScience 17: 85–86
Khan S, Bi T. 2012. Direct shoot regeneration system for date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Dhakki as a means of micropropagation. Pak. J. Bot. 44: 1965–1971
Khierallah HSM, Bader SM. 2007. Micropropagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) var. Maktoom through direct organogenesis. Acta Hort. 736: 213–224
Konieczny R, Sliwinska E, Pilarska M, Tuleja M. 2012. Morphohistological and flow cytometric analyses of somatic embryogenesis in Trifolium nigrescens Viv. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 109: 131–141
Loutfi K, El Hadrami I. 2005. Phoenix dactilyfera date palm, In RE Litz, ed, Biotechnology of Fruit and Nut Crops. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 144–156
Mager AM, Harel E. 1979. Polyphenol oxidase in plants. Phytochemistry 18: 193–215
Mazri MA. 2014. Effects of plant growth regulators and carbon source on shoot proliferation and regeneration in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) ‘16-bis’. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 89: 415–422
Mazri MA. 2015. Role of cytokinins and physical state of the culture medium to improve in vitro shoot multiplication, rooting and acclimatization of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Boufeggous. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 24: 268–275
Mazri MA, Meziani R. 2013. An improved method for micropropagation and regeneration of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 22: 176–184
Murashige T, Skoog FA. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Phys. Planta. 15: 473–479
Navarro C, Teisson C, Cote F, Ganry J. 1994. Effect of lightintensity and CO2 concentration on growth of banana plants (Musa AAA, cultivar “Petite Naine”) in vitro and subsequentgrowth following acclimatization. Sci. Hortic. 60: 41–54
Poudyal BK, Du G, Zhang Y, Liu J, Shi Q. 2008. Studies on browning problem and phenols content on shoots of Yali, Aikansui and Abbe Fetel pears for in vitro culture. Front. Agri. China 2: 321–330
Poulain C, Rhiss A, Beauchesne G. 1979. Multiplication végétative en culture in vitro du palmier dattier. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie d’Agriculture de France 11: 1151–1154
Rhiss A, Poulain C, Beauchesne G. 1979. La culture in vitro appliquée à la multiplication du palmier dattier (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Fruits 34: 551–554
Sarwar M. 1989. The role of medium composition and light intensity on in vitro root formation of strawberry. Pak. J. Bot. 21: 24–30
Sedra MH. 2005. Phenological descriptors and molecular markers for the determination of true-to-type of tissue culture-derived plants using organogenesis of some Moroccan date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties. Al Awamia 113: 85–101
Sedra MH. 2011. Development of new Moroccan selected date palm varieties resistant to bayoud and of good fruit quality, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 513–531
Sengar K, Sengar RS, Garg SK. 2011. The effect of in-vitro environmental conditions on somesugarcane varieties for micropropagation. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10: 17122–17126
Siegien I. 2013. Light affects in vitro organogenesis of Linum usitatissimum L. and its cyanogenic potential. Acta Physiol. Plant. 35: 781–789
Singh P, Patel RM. 2014. Factors influencing in vitro growth and shoot multiplication of pomegranate. Bioscan 9: 1031–1035
Skribanek A, Solymosi K, Hideg E, Böddi B. 2012. The effect of abiotic stressors (light and temperature) on chlorophyll biosynthesis. International Scientific Conference on Sustainable Development and Ecological Footprint, Sopron, Hungary, pp 1–7
Taha HS, Bekheet SA, Saker MM. 2001. Factors affecting in vitro multiplication of date palm. Biol. Plant 44: 431–433
Zaid A, El-Korchi B, Visser HJ. 2011. Commercial date palm tissue culture procedures and facility establishment, In SM Jain, JM Al-Khayri, DV Johnson, eds, Date Palm Biotechnology, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–180
Zaid A, Tisserat B. 1983. In vitro shoot tip differentiation in Phoenix dactylifera L. Date Palm J. 2: 163–182
Zhang DW, Yuan S, Xu F, Zhu F, Yuan M, Ye HX, Guo HQ, Lv X, Yin Y, Lin HH. 2014. Light intensity affects chlorophyll synthesis during greening process by metabolite signal from mitochondrial alternative oxidase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Env. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12438
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meziani, R., Jaiti, F., Mazri, M.A. et al. Effects of plant growth regulators and light intensity on the micropropagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Mejhoul. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 18, 325–331 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-015-0062-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-015-0062-4