Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Dual-Process Perspective on Mindfulness, Memory, and Consciousness

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness has recently been associated with “fringe consciousness”: an increased sensitivity to metacognitive feeling evoked from the processing of information. In three studies, we examined this notion from the scope of recognition memory. In study 1, the effect of fluency of processing on recognition memory was examined among mindfulness and control groups. Results revealed that control participants showed the typical fluency effect, in which fluency increased both hits and false alarms. However, in the mindfulness group, fluency solely increased hits. In study 2, a recognition test was conducted for positive, negative, and neutral valence words among mindfulness and mind-wandering groups. Here, estimations of recollection—a contextual retrieval process—and familiarity—a feeling of memory-based retrieval process, were assessed using the remember/know procedure. Results revealed that whereas group and valence did not interact for recollection, they did for familiarity. Critically, compared to mind-wandering controls, mindfulness increased familiarity-based retrieval of neutral words. Finally, study 3 examined whether and how facets of mindfulness are associated with recollection and familiarity. Regression analyses revealed that the facet of observing positively predicted rates of familiarity. Altogether, these findings support the notion of mindfulness as a promoter of increased sensitivity to feeling of memory at the fringe of consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberts, H. J., & Thewissen, R. (2011). The effect of a brief mindfulness practice on memory for positively and negatively valenced stimuli. Mindfulness, 2, 73–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anicha, C. L., Ode, S., Moeller, S. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). Toward a cognitive view of trait mindfulness: distinct cognitive skills predict its observing and nonreactivity facets. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 255–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlmeijer, E., Peter, M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18, 308–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 449–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danion, J. M., Kauffmann-Muller, F., Grangé, D., Zimmermann, M. A., & Greth, P. (1995). Affective valence of words, explicit and implicit memory in clinical depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 34(3), 227–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J. (2010). Empirical explorations of mindfulness: conceptual and methodological conundrums. Emotion, 10(1), 8–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering knowing and guessing. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldinger, S., & Hansen, W. (2006). Remembering by the seat of your pants. Psychological Science, 16, 525–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafenbrack, A. C., Kinias, Z., & Barsade, S. G. (2013). Debiasing the mind through meditation mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychological Science, 25, 369–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, T., & Holas, P. (2014). Metacognitive model of mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 28, 64–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 144–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory and Cognition, 31(8), 1169–1180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, L. M., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2007). The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1954–1965.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilja, J. L., Lundh, L. G., Josefsson, T., & Falkenström, F. (2013). Observing as an essential facet of mindfulness: a comparison of FFMQ patterns in meditating and non-meditating individuals. Mindfulness, 4(3), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, M. E., Westerman, D. L., & Miller, J. K. (2003). The fluency heuristic in recognition memory: the effect of repetition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, M., Szani, A., Rubenstein, K., Colgary, C., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. (2016). A brief mindfulness exercise before retrieval reduces recognition memory false alarms. Mindfulness, 7(3), 606–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E. (2016). Metacognition and mindfulness: the role of fringe consciousness. Mindfulness, 1–6. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0494-z.

  • Norman, E., Price, M. C., & Duff, S. C. (2006). Fringe consciousness in sequence learning: the influence of individual differences. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(4), 723–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., Price, M. C., Duff, S. C. (2010). Fringe consciousness: a useful framework for clarifying the nature of experience-based metacognitive feelings. In Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 63-80). Springer: US.

  • Norman, E., Price, M. C., & Jones, E. (2011). Measuring strategic control in artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1920–1929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S., & Geraci, L. (2000). Conceptual fluency selectively influences knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1070–1074.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: the subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(1), 47–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts-Wolfe, D., Sacchet, M., Hastings, E., Roth, H., & Britton, W. (2012). Mindfulness training alters emotional memory recall compared to active controls: support for an emotional information processing model of mindfulness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstreich, E. (2015). Mindfulness and false-memories: the impact of mindfulness practice on the DRM paradigm. The Journal of Psychology, 150(1), 58–71.

  • Rosenstreich, E., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2015). Recollection-based retrieval is influenced by contextual variation at encoding but not at retrieval. PloS One, 10(7), e0130403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstreich, E., & Ruderman, L. (2016). Not sensitive yet less biased: a signal detection view on the mindfulness-attention-memory connection. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 48–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinsten, O., Bialik, N., & Solar, Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship between math anxiety and gender through implicit measurement. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 279–285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruocco, A. C., & Direkoglu, E. (2013). Delineating the contributions of sustained attention and working memory to individual differences in mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 226–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, T. P., Creswell, J. D., & Denson, T. F. (2015). Brief mindfulness induction reduces inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. L., & Carlson, L. E. (2009). The art and science of mindfulness: integrating mindfulness into psychology and the helping professions. Washington, DC: APA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talmi, D., & Moscovitch, M. (2004). Can semantic relatedness explain the enhancement of memory for emotional words? Memory and Cognition, 32(5), 742–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R., & Henson, R. N. (2012). Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia, 50(13), 3027–3040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., Williams, S., & Segal, Z. V. (2002). Metacognitive awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(2), 275–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40(4), 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, D. L. (2008). Relative fluency and illusions of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1196–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1235–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2002). Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. M., Mickes, L., Stolarz-Fantino, S., Evrard, M., & Fantino, E. (2015). Increased false-memory susceptibility after mindfulness meditation. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1567–1573. doi:10.1177/0956797615593705.

  • Wurtz, P., Reber, R., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2008). The feeling of fluent perception: a single experience from multiple asynchronous sources. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 171–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control and confidence: the 3 cs of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition—effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(5), 622–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012). The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions. Memory and Cognition, 40, 663–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., Wang, W. C., & Koen, J. D. (2010). Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20, 1178–1194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioral Sciences, Peres Academic Center, Rehovot, Israel

    Eyal Rosenstreich

  2. Section of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA

    Lital Ruderman

Authors
  1. Eyal Rosenstreich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lital Ruderman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Rosenstreich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosenstreich, E., Ruderman, L. A Dual-Process Perspective on Mindfulness, Memory, and Consciousness. Mindfulness 8, 505–516 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0627-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0627-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation