Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving the accuracy of the height–diameter equation using the classified factors method

  • Thematic Issue
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The height–diameter relationship model is crucial in the estimation of forest stand volume, biomass and carbon storage, etc. To improve prediction accuracy, the classified factors method for height–diameter relationship modeling was developed based on the classified height method. The data set contained 959 tree samples obtained from 28 plots measured by topographic factors (aspect, slope position and altitude). The Chapman–Richards equation was used to build models. Classification methods have improved fitting performance and prediction accuracy compared to the classical method. The classified height method has the best fitting performance because it has the highest determination coefficient (R 2 = 0.927) and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE = 1.548), whereas the classified factors method has the highest prediction accuracy because it has the lowest mean absolute error (MAE = 1.137) and mean relative error (MRE = 0.109).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Calama R, Montero G (2004) Interregional nonlinear height–diameter model with random coefficients for stone pine in Spain. Can J For Res 34(1):150–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DG (1961) Statistical problems in dynamics of exploited fisheries populations. In: Neyman J (ed) Proceedings of 4th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 4. Berkeley, pp 153–168

  • Curtis RO (1967) Height–diameter and height–diameter–age equations for second growth Douglas-fir. For Sci 13(4):365–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan H, Yan C, Tsunekawa A, Song X, Li S, Xie J (2011) Assessing vegetation dynamics in the Three-North Shelter Forest region of China using AVHRR NDVI data. Environ Earth Sci 64(4):1011–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban GG, Ulises DA, Fernando CD, Felipe CC (2014) A comparison of model forms for the development of height–diameter relationships in even-aged stands. For Sci 60(3):560–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang ZX, Bailey RL (1998) Height–diameter models for tropical forests on Hainan Island in southern China. For Ecol Manage 110(1–3):315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekedulengn D, Siurtain MPM, Colbert JJ (1999) Parameter estimation of nonlinear growth models in forestry. Silv Fenn 33(4):327–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton MR (1999) Patterns in height–diameter relationship for selected tree species and sites in eastern Texas. Can J For Res 29(9):1445–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SM, Titus SJ, Wiens DP (1992) Comparison of nonlinear height–diameter functions for major Alberta tree species. Can J For Res 22(9):1297–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SM, Price D, Titus SJ (2000) Development of ecoregion-based height–diameter models for white spruce in boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 129(1–3):125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman K, Zakrzewski WT (2001) Practical approaches to calibrating height–diameter relationships for natural sugar maple stands in Ontario. For Ecol Manage 148(1–3):169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Hann DW (1987) Height–diameter equations for seventeen tree species in southwest Oregon, For Res Lab Res Pap 4. Oreg State Univ, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei XD, Peng CH, Wang HY, Zhou XL (2009) Individual height–diameter models for young black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) plantations in New Brunswick, Canada. For Chron 85(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HK, Fa L (2011) Height–diameter model for major tree species in China using the classified height method. Sci Silvae Sin 47(10):83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HK, Zhao PX (2013) Improving the accuracy of tree-level aboveground biomass equations with height classification at a large regional scale. For Ecol Manage 289:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Van Dam RL, Jayawickreme DH (2014) Soil moisture variability in a temperate deciduous forest: insights from electrical resistivity and throughfall data. Environ Earth Sci 72(5):1367–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehtätalo L (2004) A longitudinal height–diameter model for Norway spruce in Finland. Can J For Res 34(1):131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton RF, Amponsah (2007) Comparative evaluation of five height–diameter models developed for black spruce and jack pine stand-types in terms of goodness-of-fit, lack-of-fit and predictive ability. For Ecol Manage 247(1–3):149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng C, Zhang L, Liu J (2001) Developing and validating nonlinear height–diameter models for major tree species of Ontario’s boreal forests. North J Appl For 18:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratkowsky DA, Reedy TJ (1986) Choosing near-linear parameters in the four-parameter logistic model for radioligand and related assays. Biometrics 42(3):575–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Biol 10(2):290–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson AP, Wykoff WR (2004) Imputing missing height measures using a mixed-effects modeling strategy. Can J For Res 34(12):2492–2500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnute J (1981) A versatile growth model with statistically stable parameters. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38(9):1128–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Parton J (2007) Height–diameter equations for boreal tree species in Ontario using a mixed-effects modeling approach. For Ecol Manage 249(3):187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma M, Zhang SY (2004) Height–diameter models using stand characteristics for Pinus banksiana and Picea mariana. Scand J For Res 19(5):442–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song X, Yan C, Xie J, Li S (2012) Assessment of changes in the area of the water conservation forest in the Qilian Mountains of China’s Gansu province, and the effects on water conservation. Environ Earth Sci 66(8):2441–2448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage AR (1963) A mathematical approach to polymorphic site index curves for grand fir. For Sci 9:167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen H, Monleon VJ, Hann DW (2008) Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests. Can J For Res 38(3):553–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen H, Zhang CH, Zhao XH (2014) Modeling tree height–diameter relationships in multi-species and multi-layered forests: a large observational study from Northeast China. For Ecol Manage 316(SI):78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CH, Hann DW (1988) Height–diameter equations for sixteen tree species in the central western Willamette valley of Oregon, For Res Lab Res Pap 51. Oreg State Univ, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hou X, Wang M, Wu L, Ying L, Feng Y (2013) Topographic controls on vegetation index in a hilly landscape: a case study in the Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern China. Environ Earth Sci 70(2):625–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wykoff WR, Crookston NL, Stage AR (1982) User’s guide to the stand prognosis model. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden UT84401, General Technical Report INT-122

  • Xu W, Chen X, Luo G, Zhang Q, Lin Q (2011) Soil properties at the tree limits of the coniferous forest in response to varying environmental conditions in the Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 63(4):741–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RC, Kozak A, Smith JHG (1978) The potential of Weibull-type functions as a flexible growth curve. Can J For Res 8:424–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B (1989) Accuracy of equations describing diameter growth. Can J For Res 19(10):1283–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LJ (1997) Cross-validation of non-linear growth functions for modeling tree height–diameter relationships. Ann Bot 79(3):251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LJ, Peng CH, Huang SM, Zhou XL (2002) Development and evaluation of ecoregion-based jack pine height–diameter models for Ontario. For Chron 78(4):530–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, PR China

    Yi-Fu Wang, Tian-Xiang Yue, Zheng-Ping Du & Ming-Wei Zhao

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China

    Yi-Fu Wang & Ming-Wei Zhao

Authors
  1. Yi-Fu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tian-Xiang Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zheng-Ping Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ming-Wei Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian-Xiang Yue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, YF., Yue, TX., Du, ZP. et al. Improving the accuracy of the height–diameter equation using the classified factors method. Environ Earth Sci 74, 6471–6480 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4168-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4168-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation