Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Priority selection rating of sampling density and interpolation method for detecting the spatial variability of soil organic carbon in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil sampling density and spatial interpolation method both have effects on interpreting the spatial variability of regional soil organic carbon (SOC). However, there are few comparisons of the effects between the two factors. Based on three soil sampling designs in Yujiang County, Jiangxi Province of China, the SOC spatial distributions in a specific area, imposed on three grid sampling densities of 2 × 2 km (G 2×2), 1 × 1 km (G 1×1), and 0.5 × 0.5 km (G 0.5×0.5), were predicted via two interpolation methods: Ordinary Kriging (OK) and Kriging combined with land use information (LUK). Prediction accuracies from OK and LUK at three sampling densities were compared on the basis of 65 validation samples in the area. The results demonstrated that the correlation coefficients (r) between the measured and predicted values of validation locations obtained from OK (r = 0.212, 0.491 and 0.512) and LUK (r = 0.602, 0.776 and 0.875) increased with decreased grid size, and the root mean square errors (RMSE) from OK (RMSE = 6.79, 5.33, and 5.19 g kg−1) and LUK (RMSE = 4.74, 3.60, and 3.14 g kg−1) all decreased as expected with the sampling density increasing from G 2×2 to G 0.5×0.5. The rs from LUK were all higher and RMSEs were all lower than those from OK at three densities, respectively. More interesting, the prediction accuracy of LUK from G 2×2 was not only lower than that of OK at same density, but also lower than those of OK at G 1×1 and G 0.5×0.5. This indicates that LUK can use several times fewer soil samples than OK to predict SOC spatial variability with same accuracy. The conclusion is that the efficient interpolation method not only makes sense to obtain high-precision SOC distribution information, but also can save lots of sampling points and research costs. Therefore, research on efficient interpolation method is a key step and should be paid more attention than increasing sampling points for revealing SOC spatial variability in the hilly red soil region of China, even in the regions with similar complex terrain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvaro-Fuentes J, Easter M, Paustian K (2012) Climate change effects on organic carbon storage in agricultural soils of northeastern Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 155:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourennane H, King D, Couturier A (2000) Comparison of kriging with external drift and simple linear regression for predicting soil horizon thickness with different sample densities. Geoderma 97(3–4):255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai XR, Shen CY, Yuan XY, Huang YF (2008) Spatial prediction of soil organic matter in the presence of different external trends with REML-EBLUP. Geoderma 148(2):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HY, Shrestha BM (2012) Stand age, fire and clear cutting affect soil organic carbon and aggregation of mineral soils in boreal forests. Soil Biol Biochem 50:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant RT, Paustian K (2002) Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in grasslands: implications for detecting change at different scales. Environ Pollut 116:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin D, Beare MH, Hernandez-Ramirez G (2012) Temperature and moisture effects on microbial biomass and soil organic matter mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:2055–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darilek JL, Huang BA, Wang ZG, Qi YB, Zhao YC, Sun WX, Gu ZQ, Shi XZ (2009) Changes in soil fertility parameters and the environmental effects in a rapidly developing region of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129(1–3):286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding XL, Han XZ, Liang Y, Qiao YF, Li LJ, Li N (2012) Changes in soil organic carbon pools after 10 years of continuous manuring combined with chemical fertilizer in a Mollisol in China. Soil Tillage Res 122:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H, Vandenberg E, Reich P (1993) Organic-carbon in soils of the world. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57(1):192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim A, Wehrli L, Eugster W, Schmidt MWI (2009) Effects of sampling design on the probability to detect soil carbon stock changes at the Swiss CarboEurope site Lageren. Geoderma 149:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Rossiter DG (2007) About regression-kriging: from equations to case studies. Comput Geosci 33(10):1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Sun WX, Zhao YC, Zhu J, Yang RQ, Zou Z, Ding F, Su JP (2007) Temporal and spatial variability of soil organic matter and total nitrogen in an agricultural ecosystem as affected by farming practices. Geoderma 139(3–4):336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerry R, Oliver MA (2007) Comparing sampling needs for variograms of soil properties computed by the method of moments and residual maximum likelihood. Geoderma 140(4):383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss JJ, de Jong E, Martz LW (1988) The distribution of fallout Cesium-137 in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. J Environ Qual 17:445–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123(1–2):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZP, Zhang TL, Chen BY (2006) Changes of organic carbon and nutrient contents in highly productive paddy soils in Yujiang County of Jiangxi Province. Sci Agric Sin (in Chin) 39:324–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Shi Z, Wu CF, Li HY, Li F (2007) Improved prediction and reduction of sampling density for soil salinity by different geostatistical methods. Sci Agric Sin (in Chin) 6:832–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Wang Q, Endo T, Chao X, Kakubari Y (2010) Soil organic carbon stock is closely related to aboveground vegetation properties in cold-temperature mountainous forests. Geoderma 154:407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu TL, Juang KW, Lee DY (2006) Interpolating soil properties using kriging combined with categorical information of soil maps. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(4):1200–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Webster R (1983) How many observations are needed for regional estimation of soil properties? Soil Sci 135:177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra U, Lal R, Slater B, Calhoun F, Liu DS, Van Meirvenne M (2009) Predicting soil organic carbon stock using profile depth distribution functions and ordinary kriging. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73(2):614–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra U, Ussiri D, Lal R (2010) Tillage effects on soil organic carbon storage and dynamics in Corn Belt of Ohio USA. Soil Tillage Res 107(2):88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muel M, Van Meirvenne M (2003) Kriging soil texture under different types of nonstationarity. Geoderma 112(3–4):217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naser HM, Hadi HN, Hadi G, Behnaz D (2013) The effects of agricultural practice and land-use on the distribution and origin of some potentially toxic metals in the soils of Golestan province. Iran Environ Earth Sci 68:487–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. ASA-SSSA, Madison, pp 539–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahrawat KL, Rego TJ, Wani SP, Pardhasaradhi G (2008) Stretching soil sampling to watershed: evaluation of soil-test parameters in a semi-arid tropical watershed. Commun Soil Sci Plan Anal 39(19–20):2950–2960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi XZ, Yu DS, Wendorf ED, Sun WX, Peterson GW, Gong ZT, Lin H (2006) Cross-reference system for translating between genetic soil classification of China and soil taxonomy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(1):78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi XZ, Yu DS, Xu SX, Warner ED, Wang HJ, Sun WX, Zhao YC, Gong ZT (2010) Cross-reference for relating Genetic Soil Classification of China with WRB at different scales. Geoderma 155(3–4):344–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Office of Yujiang County (1986) Soil species of Yujiang County. Science and Technology. p 23–31

  • Steffens M, Koebl A, Giese M, Hoffmann C, Totsche KU, Breuer L, Kogel-Knabner I (2009) Spatial variability of topsoils and vegetation in a grazed steppe ecosystem in Inner Mongolia (PR China). J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172(1):78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumfleth K, Duttmann R (2008) Prediction of soil property distribution in paddy soil landscapes using terrain data and satellite information as indicators. Ecol Ind 8(5):485–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L (2003) Climatology trend analysis and prediction of sandstorms and their associated dustfall in China. Water Air Soil Pollut 3(2):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun WX, Zhao YC, Huang B, Shi XZ, Darilek JL (2012) Effect of sampling density on regional soil organic carbon estimation for cultivated soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175(5):671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui CC, Guo HY, Chen ZS (2013) Estimation of soil carbon stock in Taiwan arable soils by using legacy database and digital soil mapping. In: Soriano MCH (ed) Soil processes and current trends in quality assessment. Intech, Croatia, pp 311–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu DS, Zhang ZQ, Yang H, Shi XZ, Tan MZ, Sun WX, Wang HJ (2011) Effect of sampling density on detecting the temporal evolution of soil organic carbon in hilly red soil region of South China. Pedosphere 21(2):207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZQ, Yu DS, Shi XZ, Warner E, Ren HY, Sun WX, Tan MZ, Wang HJ (2010) Effect of sampling classification patterns on SOC variability in the red soil region, China. Soil Tillage Res 110:2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WT, Weindorf DC, Zhu Y (2011a) Soil organic carbon variability in croplands: implications for sampling design. Soil Sci 176(7):367–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZQ, Shi XZ, Yu DS, Weindorf DC, Sun WX, Wang HJ, Zhao YC (2011b) Effect of prediction methods on detecting the temporal evolution of soil organic carbon in hilly red soil region of South China. Environ Earth Sci 64:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YC, Shi XZ, Weindorf DC, Yu DS, Sun WX, Wang HJ (2006) Map scale effects on soil organic carbon stock estimation in North China. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(4):1377–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the 973 Project (2010CB950702), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41201213), the “Strategic Priority Research Program—Climate Change: Carbon Budget and Related Issues” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA05050507), and Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture (No. 0812201231).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongsheng Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Yu, D., Shi, X. et al. Priority selection rating of sampling density and interpolation method for detecting the spatial variability of soil organic carbon in China. Environ Earth Sci 73, 2287–2297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3580-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3580-3

Keywords

Navigation