Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Open access (OA) publication has become an increasingly common route for dissemination of scientific research findings. However, it remains a contentious issue with continued debate as to its impact on the peer-review process and a potential change in the quality of subsequent evidence published. There is little research that looks into OA in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Methods

We investigated the OA policy in the 30 relevant journals listed in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge journal citation report, comparing bibliometric data and quality of evidence produced in journals offering OA and those with subscription-only policies.

Results

3474 articles were graded for evidence level and the results correlated to journal OA status. 76.7 % of journals offered authors OA services. There was no difference between impact factor, self-citation rate, total citations or quality of evidence between OA and subscription journals.

Discussion

These findings should send clear messages to both clinicians and researchers and should re- assure readers that scientific findings that are disseminated in open access form do not differ in quality to those in subscription-only format. It should reinforce that open access formats are a credible way to display research findings in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Accessed 01 July 2015

  2. Laakso M, Björk BC (2012) Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Med 10:124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowman JD (2014) Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences. Am J Pharm Educ 78(10):176

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schroter S, Tite L (2006) Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. J R Soc Med 99:141–148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjork B, Soloman D (2012) Open access versus subscription journals: a comparision of scientific impact. BMC Med 17(10):73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, Gingras Y, Carr L, Brody T, Harnad S (2010) Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One 5(10):e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. “The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed 05 June 2015

  8. Sabharwal S, Patel N, Johal K (2014) Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research. Int Orthop 38(6):1297–1302. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dai N, Xu D, Zhong X, Li L, Ling Q, Bu Z (2014) Publishing in open access era: focus on respiratory journals. J Thorac Dis 6(5):564–567. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.03.18

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandhu A (2012) The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(1):45–48. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kyzas PA (2008) Evidence-based oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(5):973–986. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson Reuters Journal Evaluation and Highly Cited Research (2014). http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/JEHCR. Accessed 06 May 2015

  13. Butler D (2013) Sham journals scam authors. Nature 495(7442):421–422. doi:10.1038/495421a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beall J (2012) Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 489(7415):179. doi:10.1038/489179a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arpan Tahim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors (A. Tahim, H. Bansal, A. Goodson, K. Payne or S. Sabharwal) declared that they have no conflicts of interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tahim, A., Bansal, H., Goodson, A.M.C. et al. Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 15, 517–520 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0898-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0898-2

Keywords

Navigation