Abstract
Introduction
Open access (OA) publication has become an increasingly common route for dissemination of scientific research findings. However, it remains a contentious issue with continued debate as to its impact on the peer-review process and a potential change in the quality of subsequent evidence published. There is little research that looks into OA in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Methods
We investigated the OA policy in the 30 relevant journals listed in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge journal citation report, comparing bibliometric data and quality of evidence produced in journals offering OA and those with subscription-only policies.
Results
3474 articles were graded for evidence level and the results correlated to journal OA status. 76.7 % of journals offered authors OA services. There was no difference between impact factor, self-citation rate, total citations or quality of evidence between OA and subscription journals.
Discussion
These findings should send clear messages to both clinicians and researchers and should re- assure readers that scientific findings that are disseminated in open access form do not differ in quality to those in subscription-only format. It should reinforce that open access formats are a credible way to display research findings in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Accessed 01 July 2015
Laakso M, Björk BC (2012) Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Med 10:124
Bowman JD (2014) Predatory publishing, questionable peer review, and fraudulent conferences. Am J Pharm Educ 78(10):176
Schroter S, Tite L (2006) Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. J R Soc Med 99:141–148
Bjork B, Soloman D (2012) Open access versus subscription journals: a comparision of scientific impact. BMC Med 17(10):73
Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, Gingras Y, Carr L, Brody T, Harnad S (2010) Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One 5(10):e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. “The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed 05 June 2015
Sabharwal S, Patel N, Johal K (2014) Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research. Int Orthop 38(6):1297–1302. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5
Dai N, Xu D, Zhong X, Li L, Ling Q, Bu Z (2014) Publishing in open access era: focus on respiratory journals. J Thorac Dis 6(5):564–567. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.03.18
Sandhu A (2012) The evidence base for oral and maxillofacial surgery: 10-year analysis of two journals. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(1):45–48. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.11.011
Kyzas PA (2008) Evidence-based oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(5):973–986. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.024
Thompson Reuters Journal Evaluation and Highly Cited Research (2014). http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/JEHCR. Accessed 06 May 2015
Butler D (2013) Sham journals scam authors. Nature 495(7442):421–422. doi:10.1038/495421a
Beall J (2012) Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 489(7415):179. doi:10.1038/489179a
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors (A. Tahim, H. Bansal, A. Goodson, K. Payne or S. Sabharwal) declared that they have no conflicts of interests.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tahim, A., Bansal, H., Goodson, A.M.C. et al. Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 15, 517–520 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0898-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0898-2