Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E-Grid: a visual analytics system for evaluation structures

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce E-Grid, a visual analytics system to aid in the understanding of human cognitive structures. E-Grid supports an evaluation structure that is a type of cognitive structure extracted using the evaluation grid method (EGM), which is a qualitative research method based on semi-structured interviews. The EGM is used to clarify user requirements in several fields of applications, such as environmental psychology, marketing research, and decision support. The importance of understanding user requirements is increasing in modern society because of the diversity of individual’s senses of values. E-Grid is designed to satisfy the requirements of EGM experts. In E-Grid, graph drawing and network analysis techniques are employed and users can explore an evaluation structure with the support of visual analytics techniques. The performance of E-Grid was evaluated in a case study using real data and feedback from EGM experts. Through this evaluation, it is demonstrated that the features of E-Grid make it an efficient and effective tool for the analysis of evaluation structures.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ada I, Thiel K, Berthold MR (2010) Distance aware tag clouds. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. IEEE, pp 2316–2322

  • Alper B, Riche NH, Ramos G, Czerwinski M (2011) Design study of LineSets, a novel set visualization technique. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 17(12):2259–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmaier C (2007) A radial adaptation of the Sugiyama framework for visualizing hierarchical information. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 13(3):583–94

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bostock M, Ogievetsky V, Heer J (2011) D3: data-driven documents. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 17(12):2301–2309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandes U, Erlebach T (eds) (2005) Network analysis. In: Lecture notes in Computer Science, vol 3418. Springer, Berlin

  • Brandes U, Köpf B (2002) Fast and simple horizontal coordinate assignment. In: GD’02 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on graph drawing, pp 31–44

  • Burer S, Letchford AN (2012) Non-convex mixed-integer nonlinear programming: a survey. Surv Oper Res Manag Sci 17(2):97–106

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Collins C, Penn G, Carpendale S (2009) Bubble sets: revealing set relations with isocontours over existing visualizations. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15(6):1009–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didimo W, Montecchiani F, Pallas E, Tollis IG (2014) How to visualize directed graphs: a user study. In: IISA 2014, the 5th international conference on information, intelligence, systems and applications, pp 152–157

  • Eades P, Lin X, Smyth W (1993) A fast and effective heuristic for the feedback arc set problem. Inf Process Lett 47(6):319–323

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gansner ER, Koutsofios E, North SC, Vo KP (1993) A technique for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 19(3):214–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansner ER, Hu Y, Kobourov S (2010) GMap: visualizing graphs and clusters as maps. In: 2010 IEEE Pacific visualization symposium (PacificVis). IEEE, pp 201–208

  • Gorg C, Stasko J (2013) Combining computational analyses and interactive visualization for document exploration and sensemaking in Jigsaw. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 19(10):1646–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy P, Nikolov NS (2013) Hierarchical drawing algorithms. In: Handbook of graph drawing and visualization. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 409--454

  • Hinkle DN (1965) The change of personal constructs from the viewpoint of a theory of construct implications. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University

  • Katz L (1953) A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18(1):39–43

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly GA (1955) The psychology of personal constructs, vol 1 and 2. Norton, New York, W.W

    Google Scholar 

  • Misue K, Sugiyama K (1995) Evaluation of a thinking support system from operational points of view. Adv Hum Factors Ergon 20:697–702

  • Misue K, Nitta K, Sugiyama K, Koshiba T, Inder R (1998) Enhancing D-ABDUCTOR towards a diagrammatic user interface platform. In: Knowledge-based intelligent electronic systems, 1998. Proceedings KES ’98. 1998 second international conference on, pp 359–368

  • Morinaga C, Oi N, Takahashi H (2011) Categorization of evaluation construct and individual attributes through evaluating presentation boards of interior: a study about evolution and the transformation of the sense of values about the house environment. J Environ Eng 76(666):633–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagasawa S (2002) Revision and verification of seven tools for new product planning. KANSEI Eng Int 3(4):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbery FJ (1989) Edge concentration: a method for clustering directed graphs. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 14(7):76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2004) Detecting community structure in networks. Eur Phys J B Condens Matter Complex Syst 38(2):321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MJ (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

  • Perer A, Guy I, Uziel E, Ronen I, Jacovi M (2011) Visual social network analytics for relationship discovery in the enterprise. In: 2011 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST). IEEE, pp 71–79

  • Sanui J (1996) Visualization of users’ requirements: introduction of evaluation grid method. In: Proceedings of the 3rd design & decision support system in architecture & urban planning conference, pp 365–374

  • Sanui J, Maruyama G (1997) Revealing of preference structure by the evaluation grid method. In: Advances in human factors/ergonomics, pp 471–474

  • Shen KS, Chen KH, Liang CC, Pu WP, Ma MY (2012) Measuring the functional and usable appeal of crossover B-Car interiors. In: Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing & service industries, pp 1–17

  • Sugiyama K, Misue K (1991) Visualization of structural information: automatic drawing of compound digraphs. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 21(4):876–892

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama K, Tagawa S, Toda M (1981) Methods for visual understanding of hierarchical system structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 11(2):109–125

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JJ, Cook Ka (2005) Illuminating the path: the research and development agenda for visual analytics. National Visualization and Analytics Center, Richland, WA

  • Tsuchida Y, Kozaka Y (2008) Development and application of a supporting tool for the evaluation grid method. Archit Inst Jpn J Technol Des 14(27):205–208

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham F, Wattenberg M, Viégas FB (2009) Mapping text with phrase nets. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15(6):1169–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Landesberger T, Kuijper A, Schreck T, Kohlhammer J, van Wijk J, Fekete JD, Fellner D (2011) Visual analysis of large graphs: state-of-the-art and future research challenges. Comput Graph Forum 30(6):1719–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viégas FB, Wattenberg M, Feinberg J (2009) Participatory visualization with Wordle. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15(6):1137–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg M, Viégas FB (2008) The Word Tree, an interactive visual concordance. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 14(6):1221–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Doraiswamy H, Chen X, Miraldi E, Arrieta-Ortiz ML, Hafemeister C, Madar A, Bonneau R, Silva CT (2014) Genotet: an interactive web-based visual exploration framework to support validation of gene regulatory networks. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 20(12):1903–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Collins C, Chevalier F, Balakrishnan R (2013) Interactive exploration of implicit and explicit relations in faceted datasets. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 19(12):2080–2089

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) through a Grant-in-Aid for Data Integration and Analysis System (DIAS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Yosuke Onoue

  2. Center for the Promotion of Interdisciplinary Education and Research, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Nobuyuki Kukimoto

  3. Department of Computational Science, Graduate School of System Informatics, Kobe University, Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan

    Naohisa Sakamoto

  4. Academic Center for Computing and Media Studies, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

    Koji Koyamada

Authors
  1. Yosuke Onoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nobuyuki Kukimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naohisa Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Koji Koyamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosuke Onoue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onoue, Y., Kukimoto, N., Sakamoto, N. et al. E-Grid: a visual analytics system for evaluation structures. J Vis 19, 753–768 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-015-0342-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-015-0342-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation