Skip to main content
Log in

Obese very old women have low relative handgrip strength, poor physical function, and difficulties in daily living

  • Published:
The journal of nutrition, health & aging

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate whether anthropometric and body composition variables and handgrip strength (HS) were associated with physical function and independent daily living in 88-year-old Swedish women.

Participants

A cross-sectional analysis of 83 community-dwelling women aged 88 years who were of normal weight (n=30), overweight (n=29), and obese (n=24) was performed.

Measurements

Body weight (Wt), height, waist circumference (WC), and arm circumference were assessed using an electronic scale and a measuring tape. Tricep skinfold thickness was measured using a skinfold calliper. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis, and HS was recorded with an electronic grip force instrument. Linear regression was used to determine the contributions of parameters as a single predictor or as a ratio of HS to physical function (Short Form-36, SF-36PF) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

Results

Obese women had greater absolute FM and FFM and lower HS corrected for FFM and HS-based ratios (i.e., HS/Wt, HS/body mass index [BMI]) than their normal weight and overweight counterparts. After adjusting for physical activity levels and the number of chronic diseases, HS-based ratios explained more variance in SF-36PF scoring (R2, 0.52–0.54) than single anthropometric and body composition variables (R2, 0.45–0.51). WC, HS, and HS-based ratios (HS/Wt and HS/FFM) were also associated with independence in IADL.

Conclusion

Obese very old women have a high WC but their HS is relatively low in relation to their Wt and FFM. These parameters are better than BMI for predicting physical function and independent daily living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koster A, Patel KV, Visser M, van Eijk JT, Kanaya AM, de Rekeneire N, Newman AB, Tylavsky FA, Kritchevsky SB, Harris TB, Health AaBCS. Joint effects of adiposity and physical activity on incident mobility limitation in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:636–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedmann JM, Elasy T, Jensen GL. The relationship between body mass index and self-reported functional limitation among older adults: a gender difference. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:398–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen GL, Friedmann JM. Obesity is associated with functional decline in community-dwelling rural older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:918–923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rolland Y, Lauwers-Cances V, Pahor M, Fillaux J, Grandjean H, Vellas B. Muscle strength in obese elderly women: effect of recreational physical activity in a crosssectional study. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:552–557.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedersen AN, Ovesen L, Schroll M, Avlund K, Era P. Body composition of 80-years old men and women and its relation to muscle strength, physical activity and functional ability. J Nutr Health Aging 2002;6:413–420.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zoico E, Di Francesco V, Guralnik JM, Mazzali G, Bortolani A, Guariento S, Sergi G, Bosello O, Zamboni M. Physical disability and muscular strength in relation to obesity and different body composition indexes in a sample of healthy elderly women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28:234–241.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong HJ, Unosson M, Wressle E, Marcusson J. Health consequences associated with being overweight or obese: a Swedish population-based study of 85-year-olds. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:243–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jankowski CM, Gozansky WS, Van Pelt RE, Schenkman ML, Wolfe P, Schwartz RS, Kohrt WM. Relative contributions of adiposity and muscularity to physical function in community-dwelling older adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:1039–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hulens M, Vansant G, Lysens R, Claessens AL, Muls E, Brumagne S. Study of differences in peripheral muscle strength of lean versus obese women: an allometric approach. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:676–681.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Payette H, Hanusaik N, Boutier V, Morais JA, Gray-Donald K. Muscle strength and functional mobility in relation to lean body mass in free-living frail elderly women. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;52:45–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frontera WR, Hughes VA, Lutz KJ, Evans WJ. A cross-sectional study of muscle strength and mass in 45- to 78-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol 1991;71:644–650.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Norman K, Stobaus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke JD, Pirlich M. Hand grip strength: outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr 2011;30:135–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Choquette S, Bouchard DR, Doyon CY, Senechal M, Brochu M, Dionne IJ. Relative strength as a determinant of mobility in elders 67-84 years of age. a nuage study: nutrition as a determinant of successful aging. J Nutr Health Aging 2010;14:190–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. WHO Consultation on Obesity. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation (WHO technical report series 894). Geneva: World Health Organization. p. i–xii, 1-253, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gomez JM, Heitmann BL, Kent-Smith L, Melchior JC, Pirlich M, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis— part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 2004;23:1226–1243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Woodrow G. Body composition analysis techniques in the aged adult: indications and limitations. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2009;12:8–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordenskiold UM, Grimby G. Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects. A study with the Grippit instrument. Scand J Rheumatol 1993;22:14–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanderburgh PM, Dooman C. Considering body mass differences, who are the world’s strongest women? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:197–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grimby G, Andren E, Daving Y, Wright B. Dependence and perceived difficulty in daily activities in community-living stroke survivors 2 years after stroke: a study of instrumental structures. Stroke 1998;29:1843–1849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Daving Y, Andrén E, Grimby G. Inter-rater agreement using the Instrumental Activity Measure. Scand J Occup Ther 2000;7:33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep 1985;100:126–131.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:197–206; discussion 206.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barbat-Artigas S, Rolland Y, Zamboni M, Aubertin-Leheudre M. How to assess functional status: a new muscle quality index. J Nutr Health Aging 2012;16:67–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mingrone G, Marino S, DeGaetano A, Capristo E, Heymsfield SB, Gasbarrini G, Greco A. Different limit to the body's ability of increasing fat-free mass. Metabolism 2001;50:1004–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Campbell MJ, McComas AJ, Petito F. Physiological changes in ageing muscles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973;36:174–182.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Addison O, Marcus RL, Lastayo PC, Ryan AS. Intermuscular fat: a review of the consequences and causes. Int J Endocrinol 2014:309570.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Takata Y, Ansai T, Soh I, Awano S, Yoshitake Y, Kimura Y, Sonoki K, Kagiyama S, Yoshida A, Nakamichi I, et al. Quality of life and physical fitness in an 85-year-old population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010;50:272–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Syddall HE, Martin HJ, Harwood RH, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. The SF-36: a simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studies. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:57–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen H, Guo X. Obesity and functional disability in elderly Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:689–694.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Na YM, Park HA, Kang JH, Cho YG, Kim KW, Hur YI, Kim YN, Lee SH. Obesity, obesity related disease, and disability. Korean J Fam Med 2011;32:412–422.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guallar-Castillon P, Sagardui-Villamor J, Banegas JR, Graciani A, Fornes NS, Lopez Garcia E, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Waist circumference as a predictor of disability among older adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Angleman SB, Harris TB, Melzer D. The role of waist circumference in predicting disability in periretirement age adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;30:364–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schutz Y, Kyle UU, Pichard C. Fat-free mass index and fat mass index percentiles in Caucasians aged 18–98 y. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002;26:953–960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sergi G, Sarti S, Mosele M, Ruggiero E, Imoscopi A, Miotto F, Bolzetta F, Inelmen EM, Manzato E, Coin A. Changes in healthy elderly women’s physical performance: a 3-year follow-up. Exp Gerontol 2011;46:929–933.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Koster A, Visser M, Simonsick EM, Yu B, Allison DB, Newman AB, van Eijk JT, Schwartz AV, Satterfield S, Harris TB. Association between fitness and changes in body composition and muscle strength. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:219–226.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Duren DL, Sherwood RJ, Czerwinski SA, Lee M, Choh AC, Siervogel RM, Cameron Chumlea W. Body composition methods: comparisons and interpretation. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008;2:1139–1146.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Baumgartner RN, Ross R, Heymsfield SB. Does adipose tissue influence bioelectric impedance in obese men and women? J Appl Physiol 1998;84:257–262.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, Meinow B, Fratiglioni L. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:430–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huan-Ji Dong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, HJ., Marcusson, J., Wressle, E. et al. Obese very old women have low relative handgrip strength, poor physical function, and difficulties in daily living. J Nutr Health Aging 19, 20–25 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0512-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0512-6

Key words

Navigation