Erratum to: J Echocardiogr DOI 10.1007/s12574-013-0196-7
The original version of this article unfortunately contained errors.
In the Methods section under the subheading “Echocardiography,” in the first paragraph, the 13th sentence, “The ELCo was calculated as [EOA − AA]/(AA − EOA) [12, 13, 18].” should be “The ELCo was calculated as [EOA × AA]/(AA − EOA) [12, 13, 18].”
In the Discussion section, in the fourth paragraph, the last sentence, “Theoretically, ELI the reflects LV pressure overload better than the EOAI.” should be “Theoretically, the ELI reflects LV pressure overload better than the EOAI.”
In Table 4, “Atrial fibrillation (%)” should be “Atrial fibrillation [n (%)].”
The authors apologize for the errors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s12574-013-0196-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koyama, T., Okura, H., Kume, T. et al. Erratum to: Impact of energy loss index on left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement. J Echocardiogr 12, 59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-014-0208-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-014-0208-2