Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osteoarticular tuberculosis: in search of new biomarkers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Abstract

Background

Our objectives were to evaluate the diagnostic utility of serum and synovial fluid concentration of adenosine deaminase, interlukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-γ in patients of osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB) and define a cutoff limit of these markers in the serum and local fluid for its diagnosis.

Methods

One hundred twenty-two serum and local fluid samples collected from clinically suspected patients of osteoarticular TB were screened for adenosine deaminase (ADA) and cytokines along with microscopy, culture, and histopathological examination.

Results

After exclusion of 39 patients, in whom exact diagnosis could not be confirmed, remaining 83 patients were divided into two groups, TB (n = 53) and non-TB (n = 30). We found a statistically significant difference in the levels of serum and fluid ADA, and also in serum levels of TNF-α, between the two groups. The difference in the ratio of serum (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)/IL-6) and fluid (ADA/IFN-γ) was also found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion

Local fluid ADA, along with serum ADA, and TNF-α levels can be useful biochemical markers for the diagnosis of osteoarticular TB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TB:

Tuberculosis

IL-6:

Interlukin-6

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

IFN-γ:

Interferon gamma

References

  1. World Health Organisation (2012) Global tuberculosis report 2012. Chapter 2: The burden of disease caused by TB. WHO, Geneva, pp 8–22

  2. Nelson CA, Zunt JR (2011) Tuberculosis of the central nervous system in immunocompromised patients: HIV infection and solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 53:915–926

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buxi TB, Sud S, Vohra R (2002) CT and MRI in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Indian J Pediatr 69:965–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuli SM (1997) Tuberculosis of the skeletal system. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  5. Samanta A. Bone and joint tuberculosis: practical problems, series three. Arthritis and Rheumatism Council for Research (ARC) Reports on Rheumatic Diseases, 13 (1998) January.

  6. Mahowald ML (2000) Arthritis due to mycobacteria, fungi and parasites. In: Koopman WJ (ed) Arthritis and Allied Conditions, 14th edn, on-line version, chapter 128. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harrington JT (2001) Mycobacterial and fungal infections. In: Ruddy S, Harris ED, Sledge CB (eds) Kelley’s Textbook of Rheumatology, 6th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1493–1505

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smithwick RW (1975) Laboratory Manual for Acid-Fast Microscopy, 2nd edn. Center for disease Control, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lakhanpal VP, Tuli SM, Singh H, Sen PC (1974) The value of histology, culture and guinea pig inoculation examination in osteoarticular tuberculosis. Acta Orthop Scand 45:36–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. What is new in the diagnosis of tuberculosis ? Part I: techniques for diagnosis of tuberculosis. ICMR Bulletin 2002;38(8).

  11. Hillemann D, Gerdes S, Boehme C, Richter E (2011) Rapid molecular detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by the automated gene expert MTB/RIF system. J Clin Microbiol 49(4):1202–1205

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aggarwal VK, Nair D, Khanna G, Verma J, Sharma VK, Batra S (2012) Use of amplified mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test (Gen-probe Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in the diagnosis of tubercular synovitis and early arthritis of knee joint. Indian J Orthop 46(5):531–535

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glennon M, Cormican M (2001) Detection and diagnosis of mycobacterial pathogens using PCR. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 1:163–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirunwiwatkul P, Tumwasorn S, Chantranuwat C, Sirichai U (2002) A comparative study of diagnostic tests for tuberculous lymphadenitis: polymerase chain reaction vs histopathology and clinical diagnosis. J Med Assoc Thail 85:320–326

    Google Scholar 

  15. Negi SS, Gupta S, Khare S, Lal S (2005) Comparison of various microbiological tests including polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis. Indian J Med Microbiol 23(4):245–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho OH, Park SJ, Park KH, Chong YP, Sung H, Kim MN, Lee SO, Choi SH, Woo JH, Kim YS, Kim SH (2010) Diagnostic usefulness of a T-cell-based assay for osteoarticular tuberculosis. J Infect 61(3):228–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chander A, Shrestha C. Diagnostic value of serum adenosine deaminase levels in sputum smearnegative pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Nepalese population. Asia Pac J Trop Biomed 2012;S1896-S1899.

  18. Stevanovic G, Pelemis M, Pelemis S, Pavlovic M (2012) Non specific biological markers as a screening test for diagnostic of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Arch Biol Sci Belgrad 64(2):489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Foocharoen C, Sarntipipattana C, Foocharoen T, Mahakkanukrauh A, Paupairoj A, Teerajetgul Y, Nanagara R (2011) Synovial fluid adenosine deaminase activity to diagnose tuberculous septic arthritis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 42(2):331–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wallis SR, Ellner JJ (1994) Cytokines and tuberculosis. J Leukoc Biol 55:676–681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma SK, Suresh V, Mohan A, Kaur P, Saha P, Kumar A, Pande JN (2001) A prospective study of sensitivity and specificity of adenosine deaminase estimation in the diagnosis of tuberculosis pleural effusion. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 43(3):149–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bharat V, Gupta BK, Bandyopadhyay D (2010) Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of adenosine deaminase in patients of tubercular and non-tubercular serosal effusion in India. J Clin Med Res 2(3):121–126

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mootoo A, Stylianou E, Arias MA, Reljic R (2009) TNF-alpha in tuberculosis: a cytokine with a split personality. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 8(1):53–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stenger S (2005) Adverse events with biologics immunological control of tuberculosis: role of tumour necrosis factor and more. Ann Rheum Dis 64

  25. Andrade Júnior DR, Santos SA, Castro I, Andrade DR (2008) Correlation between serum tumor necrosis factor alpha levels and clinical severity of tuberculosis. Braz J Infect Dis 12(3):226–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Agase V, Shenai S, Mohrir G, Deshmukh M, Bhaduri A, Deshpande R et al (2009) Osteoarticular tuberculosis-diagnostic solutions in a disease endemic region. J Infect Dev Ctries 3:511–516

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jena S, Jain AK, Ramachandran VG (2008) Correlation of clinicoradiological bacteriological, immunologival and histological diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis. J Orthop 5:10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pooja Dhiman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, D., Dhiman, P., Rajendiran, S. et al. Osteoarticular tuberculosis: in search of new biomarkers. Eur Orthop Traumatol 6, 195–200 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0299-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0299-x

Keywords

Navigation