Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomic healing of a humeral shaft fracture despite failure of plate fixation—locking plates are a good idea

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Abstract

Fractures of the humeral shaft are a serious and fairly common problem with an incidence expected to triple in the next three decades partly due to an ageing population. These injuries often occur in a bimodal distribution with peaks primarily in young male patients and a larger peak in older females from 60–80 years of age. We present a case of an elderly female patient that describes a rare outcome of bone union in a failed fixation done for a humeral shaft fracture, a situation rarely reported in literature to the best of our knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsunaga FT, Tamaoki MJ, Matsumoto MH, dos Santos JB, Faloppa F, Belloti JC (2013) Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures—minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. 14(246):1745–6215;1745–6215

  2. Gosler MW, Testroote M, Morrenhof JW, Janzing HM (2012) Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1(CD008832):1361–6137, 1469-493X

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tytherleigh-Strong G, Walls N, McQueen MM (1998) The epidemiology of humeral shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 802:249–253. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.80B2.8113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarmiento A, Kinman P, Galvin E et al (1977) Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:596–601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zagorski JB, Latta LL, Zych GA et al (1988) Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:607–610

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA et al (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:478–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rutgers M, Ring D (2006) Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 20:597–601. doi:10.1097/01.bot.0000249423.48074.82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Denard A, Jr, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, et al. Outcomes of nonoperative vs operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics

  10. Idoine JD 3rd, French BG, Opalek JM et al (2012) Plating of acute humeral diaphyseal fractures through an anterior approach in multiple trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma 26:9–18. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318214ebd5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Templeman DC, Sims SA (2007) Humeral shaft fractures. In: Stannard JP, Schmidt AH, Kregor PJ (eds) Surgical treatment of orthopaedic trauma. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc, New York, pp 263–284

    Google Scholar 

  12. Illert T, Rammelt S, Drewes T, Grass R, Zwipp H (2011) Stability of locking and non-locking plates in an osteoporotic calcaneal fracture model. Foot Ankle Int 32(3):307–313, 1071–1007 (2011 Mar) Publication Date: March 2011, Source: AMED

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt KJ, Barr CR, Lindsey DP, Chou LB (2012) Locked versus nonlocked plate fixation for first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. Foot Ankle Int 33(11):984–990, 1071–1007 (2012 Nov) Publication Date: November 2012, Source: AMED

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gondusky JS, Carney J, Erpenbach J, Robertson C, Mahar A, Oka R, Thompson M, Mazurek M (2011) Biomechanical comparison of locking versus nonlocking volar and dorsal T-plates for fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures. J Orthop Trauma 25(1):44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller DL, Goswami T (2007) A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing. Clin Biomech 22(10):1049–1062, 0266–033 (2007 Dec) Publication Date: December 2007 Source: AMED

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bogunovic L, Cherney SM, Rothermich MA, Gardner MJ (2013) Biomechanical considerations for surgical stabilization of osteoporotic fractures. Orthop Clin N Am 44(2):183–200, 0030–5898 (2013 Apr) Publication Date: April 2013 Source: AMED

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim T, Ayturk UM, Haskell A, Miclau T, Puttlitz CM (2007) Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates. J Foot Ankle Surg 46(1):2–6, 1067–2516 (2007 Jan-Feb), Publication Date: January 2007, Source: AMED

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zehnder S, Bledsoe JG (2009) The effects of screw orientation in severely osteoporotic bone: a comparison with locked plating. Clin Biomech 24(7):589–594, 0268–0033 (2009 Aug), Publication Date: August 2009, Source: AMED

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C, Reimer M, Wagner UA (1997) Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results. J Orthop Trauma 11(4):283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Andronic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andronic, A., Weusten, A. & Harrison, J. Anatomic healing of a humeral shaft fracture despite failure of plate fixation—locking plates are a good idea. Eur Orthop Traumatol 6, 471–473 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0290-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0290-6

Keywords

Navigation