Skip to main content
Log in

Pelvic fractures in polytrauma: which classification system better predicts hemodynamic instability?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

The correlation between pelvic fracture pattern and mortality has been previously investigated and demonstrated. However, the purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the relationship between hemodynamic instability and pelvic fracture pattern according to different classifications.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study of high-energy pelvic fractures was performed for consecutive patients admitted to our Level I trauma center between June 2007 and June 2010. A total of 759 polytrauma patients were attended, 100 of whom had a pelvic fracture and were included in our study. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, and associated injuries were recorded. The patients were classified as hemodynamic stable or unstable. The pelvic fracture patterns were divided into stable and unstable group according to the Young-Burgess and Tile classifications. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the relationship between fracture pattern and hemodynamic instability.

Results

High-energy pelvic fracture was more frequent in men (70 %), the mean age was 45.2 years, and the mortality rate was 24 %. The main mechanism of injury was motor vehicle injury (41 %). Pelvic fracture pattern (neither Tile classification nor Young-Burgess classification) showed no correlation with the hemodynamic condition of the patient in our study (p > 0.05). Death could neither be predicted on the basis of pelvic fracture pattern (p > 0.05). We found a statistical association between patients affected by high-energy pelvic fracture and head injury, and death (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Pelvic fracture pattern is not useful to predict hemodynamic instability in polytrauma, regardless of the classification system used. Pelvic fracture pattern is not useful to predict mortality risk; however, it contributes to increase mortality risk in cases of associated head injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dalal SA, Burgess AR, Siegel JH et al (1989) Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma 29:981–1000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW et al (1990) Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 30:848–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hak DJ, Smith WR, Suzuki T (2009) Management of hemorrhage in life-threatening pelvic fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:447–457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Starr AJ, Griffin DR, Reinert CM et al (2002) Pelvic ring disruptions: prediction of associated injuries, transfusion requirement, pelvic arteriography, complications, and mortality. J Orthop Trauma 16:553–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manson T, O'Toole RV, Whitney A et al (2010) Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and non-orthopaedic injuries? J Orthop Trauma 24:603–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Poole GV, Ward EF, Muakkassa FF et al (1991) Pelvic fracture from major blunt trauma. Outcome is determined by associated injuries. Ann Surg 213:532–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tachibana T, Yokoi H, Kirita M et al (2009) Instability of the pelvic ring and injury severity can be predictors of death in patients with pelvic ring fractures: retrospective study. J Orthopaed Traumatol 10:79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heetveld MJ, Harris I, Schlaphoff G et al (2004) Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: recent care and new guidelines. World J Surg 28:904–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parreira JG, Coimbra R, Rasslan S et al (2000) The role of associated injuries on outcome of blunt trauma patients sustaining pelvic fractures. Injury 31:677–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP et al (2002) The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma 53:446–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guyton JL, Perez EA (2010) Fracturas del acetábulo y la pelvis. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell: Cirugía Ortopédica. Elsevier, Barcelona, pp 3309–3370

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith W, Williams A, Agudelo J et al (2007) Early predictors of mortality in hemodynamically unstable pelvis fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balogh Z, Caldwell E, Heetveld M et al (2005) Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference? J Trauma 58:778–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cryer HM, Miller FB, Evers BM et al (1988) Pelvic fracture classification: correlation with hemorrhage. J Trauma 28:973–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sathy GA, Starr AJ, Smith WR et al (2009) The effect of pelvic fracture on mortality after trauma: an analysis of 63,000 trauma patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2803–2810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fangio P, Asehnoune K, Edouard A et al (2005) Early embolization and vasopressor administration for management of life-threatening hemorrhage from pelvic fracture. J Trauma 58:978–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gruen GS, Leit ME, Gruen RJ et al (1994) The acute management of hemodynamically unstable multiple trauma patients with pelvic ring fractures. J Trauma 36:706–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lunsjo K, Tadros A, Hauggaard A et al (2007) Associated injuries and not fracture instability predict mortality in pelvic fractures: a prospective study of 100 patients. J Trauma 62:687–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agolini SF, Shah K, Jaffe J et al (1997) Arterial embolization is a rapid and effective technique for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage. J Trauma 43:395–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Riemer BL, Butterfield SL, Diamond DL et al (1993) Acute mortality associated with injuries to the pelvic ring: the role of early patient mobilization and external fixation. J Trauma 35:671–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josep Cortina Gualdo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortina Gualdo, J., Barastegui Fernandez, D., Teixidor Serra, J. et al. Pelvic fractures in polytrauma: which classification system better predicts hemodynamic instability?. Eur Orthop Traumatol 4, 35–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-012-0144-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-012-0144-4

Keywords

Navigation