Skip to main content
Log in

Hole detection algorithm for chamferless square peg-in-hole based on shape recognition using F/T sensor

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precision parts are difficult to assemble using only position control. To deal with this difficulty, force control approaches, which provide proper motion responses against contact forces, are investigated. Moreover, hole detection is a crucial step in eliminating the uncertainty in robotic assembly. Without a proper hole detection algorithm, assembly time increases with the position difference between the peg and the hole. In this study, we propose a shape recognition algorithm based on a 6-axis F/T sensor and a hole detection algorithm. The proposed hole detection algorithm can find the direction of a hole regardless of the size of the position error between the peg and the hole with some overlap of the hole and the peg. The same algorithm can be implemented not only for a circular peg, but also for a polygonal convex peg. A series of experimental results show that the proposed algorithms can estimate the shape and location of a peg reasonably well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pan, Z., Zhang, H., Zhu, Z., and Wang, J., “Chatter Analysis of Robotic Machining Process,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 173, No. 3, pp. 301–309, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitney, D. E., “Mechanical Assemblies: Their Design, Manufacture, and Role in Product Development,” Oxford University Press, pp. 253–292, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stemmer, A., Schreiber, G., Arbter, K., and Albu-Schäffer, A., “Robust Assembly of Complex Shaped Planar Parts Using Vision and Force,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, pp.493–500, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, H., Zhang, G., Zhang, H., and Fuhlbrigge, T. A., “Integrated Robotic System for High Precision Assembly in a Semi-Structured Environment,” Assembly Automation, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 247–252, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruyninckx, H., Dutre, S., and De Schutter, J., “Peg-on-Hole: a Model based Solution to Peg and Hole Alignment,” Proc. of International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 1919–1924, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caine, M. E., Lozano-Pérez, T., and Seering, W. P., “Assembly Strategies for Chamferless Parts,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1, pp. 472–477, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Je, H. W., Baek, J. Y., and Lee, M. C., “Current based Compliance Control Method for Minimizing an Impact Force at Collision of Service Robot Arm,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 251–258, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar, N., Panwar, V., Sukavanam, N., Sharma, S. P., and Borm, J. H., “Neural Network based Hybrid Force/Position Control for Robot Manipulators,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 419–426, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chhatpar, S. R. and Branicky, M. S., “Search Strategies for Peg-in-Hole Assemblies with Position Uncertainty,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1465–1470, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marvel, J. A. and Newman, W. S., “Model-Assisted Stochastic Learning for Robotic Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 835–845, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chhatpar, S. R. and Branicky, M. S., “Particle Filtering for Localization in Robotic Assemblies with Position Uncertainty,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3610–3617, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rozo, L., Jiménez, P., and Torras, C., “A Robot Learning from Demonstration Framework to Perform Force-based Manipulation Tasks,” Intelligent Service Robotics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 33–51, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Newman, W., Birkhimer, C., and Hebbar, R., “Towards Automatic Transfer of Human Skills for Robotic Assembly,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2528–2533, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mercimek, M., Gulez, K., and Mumcu, T. V., “Real Object Recognition using Moment Invariants,” Sadhana, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 765–775, 2005.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Glosser, G. D. and Newman, W. S., “The Implementation of a Natural Admittance Controller on an Industrial Manipulator,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 1209–1215, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tsuda, M., Takahashi, T., and Ogata, H., “Creating an Assembly-Task Model by Human Demonstration,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 4, pp. 1007–1013, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Bok Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, YL., Song, HC. & Song, JB. Hole detection algorithm for chamferless square peg-in-hole based on shape recognition using F/T sensor. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 15, 425–432 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0353-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-014-0353-6

Keywords

Navigation