Skip to main content
Log in

Business engagement on Twitter: a path analysis

  • Special Theme
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media services, such as Twitter, enable commercial businesses to participate actively in online word-of-mouth communication. In this project, we examined the potential influences of business engagement in online word-of-mouth communication on the level of consumers’ engagement and investigated the trajectories of a business’ online word-of-mouth message diffusion in the Twitter community. We used path analysis to examine 164,478 tweets from 96,725 individual Twitter users with regards to nine brands during a 5-week study period. We operationalized business engagement as the amount of online word-of-mouth messages from brand and the number of consumers the brand follows. We operationalized consumers’ engagement as the number of online word-of-mouth messages from consumers both connecting to the brand and having no connection with the brand as well as the number of consumers following the brand. We concluded that the business engagement on Twitter relates directly to consumers’ engagement with online word-of-mouth communication. In addition, retweeting, as an explicit way to show consumers’ response to business engagement, indicates that the influence only reaches consumers with a second-degree relationship to the brand and that the life cycle of a tweet is generally 1.5 to 4 hours at most. Our research has critical implications in terms of advancing the understanding of the business’s role in the online word-of-mouth communication and bringing insight to the analytics of social networks and online word-of-mouth message diffusion patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt, J. (1967). Word-of-mouth advertising and informal communication. In D. F. Cox (Ed.), Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior (pp. 188–239). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S., & Mahajan, V. (2001). The economic leverage of the virtual community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 103–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharati, P., & Tarasewich, P. (2002). Global perceptions of journals publishing e-commerce research. Communications of the ACM, 45(5), 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & Khazanchi, D. (2008). An empirical study of online word of mouth as a predictor for multi-product category e-Commerce sales. Electronic Markets, 18(2), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Chernatony, L. (2000). Succeeding with brands on the Internet. Brand Management, 8(3), 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., Das, S., Dellarocas, C., Pfeiffer, B., et al. (2005). The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Letters, 16(3/4), 415–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, H.-Y. (2004). Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(5), 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdhury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60(11), 2169–2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. (2007). Unleashing the power of word of mouth: Creating brand advocacy to drive growth. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 448–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lleti, R., Ortiz, M. C., Sarabia, L. A., & Sanchez, M. S. (2004). Selecting variables for k-means cluster analysis by using a genetic algorithm that optimises the silhouettes. Analytica Chimica Acta, 515(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olobatuyi, M. E. (2006). A user’s guide to path analysis. Lanham: University Press of America, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(4), 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagolla, D. (2009). 140 characters: A style guide for the short form. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., & Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 527–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauters, R. (2009). Twitter spawned 50,000 apps to date, will open up firehose for more. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/09/twitter-le-web-2009/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mimi Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Thomas Hess

Appendix

Appendix

Table 12 Businesses’ Twitter accounts on May 31, 2009
Table 13 Queries to collect tweets mentioning about businesses
Table 14 Top retweeted tweets

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Jansen, B.J. & Chowdhury, A. Business engagement on Twitter: a path analysis. Electron Markets 21, 161–175 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0065-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-011-0065-z

Keywords

JEL

Navigation