Abstract
Physical habitat of any aquatic ecosystem is an integral part upon which the biological structures of resident communities are built. Degradation of the physical habitat has serious consequences on aquatic communities and is among the leading causes of stream impairment worldwide. Therefore, a sound habitat assessment approach is necessary to assess the condition of running water and to determine if habitat degradation is responsible for any degradation in biological condition. The present study was focused on Physical Habitat Assessment of Denwa River, a sub tributary of river Narmada in central India, for generating a Habitat Suitability map. The Denwa River originates from Satpura ranges in central India and flows through entire Pachmarhi plateau supporting a diversity of habitats for aquatic flora and fauna. A survey was carried out to assess the physical characteristic of Denwa river (84 kms) from its origin to the confluence point of Tawa Denwa river. Six reaches have been identified in study area on the basis of their physiographic conditions. For Habitat Assessment measurement, Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Stream and Wadeable rivers by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 841-B-99-002) have been used. Seven parameters from this protocol have been chosen for physical characterization. GIS techniques have been used to develop a Habitat Suitability Map of the study area based on scores to illustrate its suitability to support aquatic life. The present paper discusses in detail the suitability of the different reaches of the River Denwa for supporting the aquatic biodiversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeyemo, O. K. (2008). Habitat assessment for seasonal variation of river pollution in Ibadan, Nigeria, in a geographic information system interface. Vertinaria Italiana, 44(2), 361–371.
Bain, M. B., & Boltz, J. M. (1989). Regulated stream flow and warm water stream fish: A general hypothesis and Research agenda. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, 89(18), 1–28.
Ball, J. (1982). Stream classification guidelines for Wisconsin. Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Barbour, M. T. (1991a). Stream surveys-the imporatance of the relation between habitat quality and biological cndition. Sediment and water quality in a changing environment: Trends and explanation (Proceedings of the ienna Symposium, August 1991)IAHS Publ. no. 203, 161–168.
Barbour, M. T., & Stribling, J. B. (1991). Use of habitat assessment in evaluating the biological integrity of stream communities. In George Gibson (Ed.), Biological criteria: Research and regulation, proceedings of a symposium, 12–13 December 1990, Arlington, Virginia. Washington, D.C: Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-440-5-91-005.
Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Synder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable river: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, Second Edition. (EPA 841-B-99-002). United States Environmental Protection Agency: 1-339.
Beschta, R. L., & Platts, W. S. (1986). Morphological features of small streams: Significance and function. Water Resource Bulletin, 22(3), 369–379.
Cushman, R. M. (1985). Review of ecological effects of rapidly varying flows downstream from hydroelectric facilities. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 5, 330–339.
Gislason, J. C. (1985). Aquatic insect abundance in a regulated stream under fluctuating and stable diel flow patterns. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 5, 39–46.
Gordon, N. D., McMahon, T. A., & Finlayson, B. L. (1992). Stream hydrology: An introduction for ecologists. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons. Inc.
Gorman, O. T. (1988). The dynamics of habitat use in a guild of Ozark minnows. Ecological Monographs, 58(1), 1–18.
Hupp, C. R. (1992). Riparian vegetation recovery patterns following stream channelization: A geomorphic perspective. Ecology, 73(4), 1209–1226.
Hupp, C. R., & Simon, A. (1986). Vegetation and bank-slope development. Proceedings of the Fourth Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, 4, 83–92.
MacDonald, L. H., Smart, A. W., & Wissmar, R. C. (1991). Monitoring guidelines to evaluate effects of forestry activities on streams in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. Prepared for Region 10. Seattle, Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 910/9-91-001.
Plafkin, J. L., Barbour, M. T., Porter, K. D., Gross, S. K., & Huges, R. M. (1989). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and Standards. EPA 440-4-89-001.
Platts, W. S., Megahan, W. F., & Minshall, G. W. (1983). Methods for evaluating streams, riparian, and biotic conditions. Ogden, Utah: U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service. General Technical Report INT-138.
Rankin, E. T. (1991). The use of qualitative habitat evaluation index for use attainability studies in streams and Rivers in Ohio. In George (Ed.), Biological criteria: Research and regulation, office of water. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 440/5-91-005.
Rosgen, D. L. (1985). A stream classification system. In proceedings of the First North American Riparian Conference Riparian Ecosystem and their Management: Reconciling conflicting uses. Tucson, Arizona: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. General Technical Report RM-120.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA). (1983). Technical support manual: Water body surveys and assessments for conducting use attainability analyses, Volumes 1-3. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Prof. Pradeep Shrivastava, Principal Investigator, NVDA Project, Department of Environmental Sciences & Limnology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, India for permission to use Remote Sensing and GIS softwares. Thanks are due to Mr. Satish Bara, Mr. Manoj Vishwakarma and Mr. Dinesh Damde who helped us in field visits during the study period.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Vyas, V., Kumar, A., Parashar, V. et al. Physical Habitat Assessment of River Denwa Using GIS Techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41, 127–139 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0191-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-011-0191-2