Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of Ezinepazarı–Sungurlu Fault Zone (Turkey) using Landsat TM data and its kinematic implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study area is located between Çorum and Amasya along the Ezinepazarı–Sungurlu Fault Zone (ESFZ) which is regarded as the splay of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). By this study, the 1/25,000 scaled geological map of the study area was prepared, and its stratigraphic and tectonic characteristics were unraveled as a result of palaeontological and petrographical analyses of the samples collected from different rock units. Particularly, geologic ages of the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Ferhatkaya and Carcurum and Middle Eocene Çekerek formations were provided from palaeontological determinations. Using Landsat TM and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 3 (SRTM 3) data of the region, the borders between the rock units and the tectonic characteristics in the study area were clarified by spectral and spatial enhancement methods. Kinematic characteristics of ESFZ obtained from the young sedimentary rocks along both sides of the fault zone were also inferred in this study. Understanding the kinematic and geometrical characteristics of the faults is important in terms of the seismotectonics of the region. In the statistical study conducted on the basis of the directions of the lineaments indicates the highest concentrations in general between N 50° - 60° E and N 60° - 70° E. Band 7 of the study area was enlightened in SE direction taking into consideration the relation of the geologic structures in the region with NAFZ and ESFZ and their general strike directions. Along with the formation of NAFZ, the region has undergone a counterclockwise rotation of approximately 20°–30°, which has developed between the “splay” faults in the south block of that fault. These faults are strike-slip faults formed under the compressional regime roughly in a NW–SE direction. It is noted that this tectonic regime has developed under compression in NW–SE direction, which was dominant in similar kinematic analysis studies conducted on NAFZ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adıyaman O, Chorowicz J, Arnaud N, Gundogdu N, Gourgaud A (2001) Late Cenozoic tectonics and volcanism along the North Anatolian Fault: new structural and geochemical data. Tectonophysics 338:135–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armijo R, Meyer B, Barka AA, Hubert A (1999) Propagation of the North Anatolian Fault into the Northern Aegean: timing and kinematics. Geology 27:267–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayhan ME, Demir C, Kahveci M, Kaplan M (1995) 1990-1993 yılları GPS ölçümleri ile Gerede-Adapazarı bölgesindeki alanın belirlenmesi. In: Türk Haritacılığının 100. yılı Bilimsel Kongresi, Ankara, pp. 55–60 (in Turkish with English abstract)

  • Barka AA (1981) Seismotectonics aspects of the North Anatolian Fault Zone. Thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, Ph. D

    Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA (1992) The North Anatolian Fault Zone. Ann Tectonics 6:164–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA, Hancock PL (1984) Neotectonics deformation patterns in the convexnorthwards arc of the North Anatolin Fault. In: J.G. Dixon, A.H.F. Robertson (eds) “The geological evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean”. Geol. Soc., London, p 763–773.

  • Barka AA, Gülen L (1989) New constraints on the age and total offset of the North Anatolian Fault Zone: implications for tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region. METU J Pure Appl Sci 21:39–63

  • Barka A, Reilinger R (1997) Active tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region: deduced from GPS, neotectonic and seismicity data. Annali Di Geofisica 40: 587–610

  • Barka A, Akyüz HS, Cohen HA, Watchorn F (2000) Tectonic evolution of the Niksar and Taşova-Erbaa pull-apart basins, North Anatolian Fault Zone: their significance for the motion of the Anatolian block. Tectonophysics 322:243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger Z (1984) Structural analysis of low relief basins using Landsat data. Presented at the International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Third Thematic Conference, Remote Sensing for Exploration Geology, Colorado Springs, Colorado, 16–19 April 1984, pp. 251–271

  • Bozkurt E (2001) Neotectonics of Turkey—a synthesis. Geodin Acta 14:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozkurt E, Koçyiğit A (1995) Almus Fault Zone: its age, total offset and relation to the North Anatolian Fault Zone. Turk J Earth Sci 4:93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozkurt E, Koçyiğit A (1996) The Kazova Basin: an active negative flower structure on the Almus Fault Zone, a splay fault system of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics 265:239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campagna DJ, Levandowski DW (1991) Recognition of strike-slip fault systems using imagery gravity and topographic data sets. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 57:1195–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey E (1979) Recherche des directions principales des contraintes associées au jeu d’une population de failles. Rev Geogr Phys 21:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez PC (1988) An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ 24:459–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crippen RE (1989) Selection of Landsat TM band and bandratio combinations to maximize lithologic information in color composite displays. Proceedings of the 7th Thematic Conference on Remote Sensing for Exploration Geology held in Calgary, Alberta, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan, 2–6 October 1989, pp. 917–921

  • Drury SA, Holt RW (1980) The tectonic framework of the South Indian craton: a reconnaissance involving Landsat imagery. Tectonophysics 65:T1–T15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury SA (1986) Remote sensing of geological structure in temperate agricultural areas. Geol Mag 123:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erturaç MK, Tüysüz O (2012) Kinematics and Basin Formation along the Ezinepazar-Sungurlu Fault Zone, NE Anatolia, Turkey. Turk J Earth Sci 21:497–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier P, Brun JP, Moriceau R, Sokoutis D, Martinod J, Jolivet L (1999) Timing, kinematics and cause of Aegean extension: a scenario based on a comparison with simple analogue experiments. Tectonophysics 315:31–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle S, Akhavi MS (1989) Application of GIS and remote sensing for lineament mapping of structural features in the Rouyn-Beauchastel property, Quebec. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1989, 12th. Can Symp Remote Sens 1:116–118

    Google Scholar 

  • İşseven T, Tüysüz O (2006) Palaeomagnetically defined rotations of fault bounded continental blocks in the North Anatolian Shear Zone, North Central Anatolia. J Asian Earth Sci 28:469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen J (1996) Introductory digital image processing, a remote sensing perspective, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 316 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketin İ (1969) About the North Anatolian Fault. Min Res Explor Inst Bull 72:1–25 (in Turkish with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiratzi AA (1993) A study of the active crustal deformation of the North and East Anatolian fault zones. Tectonophysics 225:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissel C, Laj C, Poisson A, Görür N (2003) Paleomagnetic reconstruction of the Cenozoic evolution of the eastern Mediterranean. Tectonophysics, 362: 199–217

  • Koçbulut F (2004) Göynücek-Gediksaray Kuzeyinde (GB Amasya) Ezinepazar-Sungurlu Fayı’nın Neotektonik Özellikleri [Neotectonic characteristics of the Ezinepazar-Sungurlu Fault in the northern part of Göynücek-Gediksaray Region (SW Amasya)]. PhD Thesis, Sivas Cumhuriyet University [in Turkish with English abstract]

  • Koçbulut F, Tatar O, Piper JDA (2011) Ezinepazarı-Sungurlu Fay Zonu üzerinde yeralan Göynücek Volkanikleri’nin (GB Amasya) paleomanyetik yöntemlerle incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Yerbilimleri Dergisi, Cilt : 28, Sayı : 1, Sayfa: 65–76

  • Koçyiğit A (1988a) Tectonic setting of the Geyve fault zone. METU Pure Appl Sci 21:81–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçyiğit A (1988b) Basic geologic characteristics and total offset of the North Anatolian Fault Zone in Suşehri area, NE Turkey. METU Pure Appl Sci 22:43–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçyiğit A (1989) Suşehri basin: an active fault-wedge basin on the North Anatolian Fault Zone Turkey. Tectonophysics 167:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koçyiğit A (1990) Tectonic setting of the Gölova basin, total offset of the North Anatolian Fault Zone Eastern Pontides, Turkey. Anneles Tecton 4:155–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusky TM, Ramadan TM (2002) Structural controls on Neoproterozoic mineralization in the South Eastern Desert, Egypt: an integrated field, Landsat TM and SIR C/X SAR approach. J Afr Earth Sci 35(1):107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowman PD (1990) Teaching structural geology with orbital imagery. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1990. IGARSS ‘90. ‘Remote Sensing Science for the Nineties’. May 20–24, pp. 2111

  • Masuoka PM, Harris J, Lowman PD Jr, Blodget HW (1988) Digital processing of orbital radar data to enhance geologic structure: examples from the Canadian Shield. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54:621–632

    Google Scholar 

  • McClusky S, Balassanian S, Barka AA, Demir C, Gergiev I, Hamburger M, Kahle H, Kasters K, Kekelidse G, King R, Kotzev V, Lenk O, Mahmoud S, Mishin A, Nadaria M, Ouzounus A, Paradisissis D, Peter Y, Prilepin M, Reilinger R, Sanlı I, Seeger H, Teableb A, Toksöz N, Veis G (2000) GPS constraints on crustal movements and deformations for plate dynamics. J Geophys Res 105:5695–5720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie DP (1970) Plate tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Nature 220:239–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade BJ, Hager BH, McClusky SC, Reilinger RE, Ergintav S, Lenk, O, Barka A, Özener H (2002) Estimates of seismic potential in the Marmara Sea region from block models of secular deformation constrained by global positioning system measurements. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92: 208–215

  • Moon CJ, Whately MKG, Evans MA (2006) Introduction to mineral exploration, Blackwell, Oxford

  • Okay AI, Tüysüz O (1999) Tethyan sutures of northern Turkey. In: Durand B, Horváth F, Séranne M (eds) “The Mediterranean Basins: tertiary extension within the Alpine orogen”, vol 156. Geological Society, Special Publication, London, pp 475–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Oral MB, Reilinger RE, Toksöz MN, Kong RW, Barka AA, Kınık Đ, Cenk O (1995) Global positioning system offers evidence of plate motions in eastern Mediterranean. EOS Transact 76(9)

  • Özden S, Över S, Ünlügenç UC (2002) Quaternary stress regime change along the eastern North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Int Geol Rev 44(11):1037–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper JDA, Tatar O, Gürsoy H (1997) Deformational behaviour of continental lithosphere decuded from block rotations across the North Anatolian Fault Zone in Turkey. Earth Planet Sci Lett 150:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platzman ES, Platt JP, Tapırdamaz MC, Sanver M, Rundle CC (1994) Why are there no clockwise rotations along the North Anatolian Fault Zone? Journal of Geophysical Research, 99: 21705–21715

  • Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge, London, 963 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Qari MYHT (1991) Application of Landsat TM data to geological studies, Al-Khabt area, southern Arabian Shield. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 57:421–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilinger RE, McClusky SC, Oral MB, King W, Toksöz MN (1997) Global Positoning system measurements of present-day crustal movements in the Arabian-Africa-Eurasia plate collision zone. J Geophys Res 102:9983–9999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilinger R, McClusky S, Vernant P, Lawrence S, Ergintav S, Çakmak R, Özener H, Kadirov F, Guliev İ, Stepanyan R, Nadariya M, Galaktion H, Mahmoud S, Sakr K, ArRajehi A, Paradissis D, Al-Aydrus A, Prilepin M, Guseva T, Emre E, Evren E, Dmitrotsa A, Filikov SV, Gomez F, Al-Ghazzi R, Karam G (2006) GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa–Arabia–Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. J Geophys Res 111, B05411. doi:10.1029/2005JB004051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymen İ (1975) Kelkit vadisi kesiminde Kuzey Anadolu fay zonunun tektonik özelliği: Doktora tezi, İ.T.Ü. Maden Fak. Yayını, 192 s

  • Singh A, Harrison A (1985) Standardized principal components. Int J Remote Sens 6:883–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub C (1996) Recent crustal deformation and strain accumulation in the Marmara Sea region, N.W. Anatolia, inferred from GPS measurements, PhD Thesis, ETH Zürich

  • Suzanne P, Lyberis N, Chorowicz J, Nurlu M, Yürür T, Kasapoğlu E (1990) La gèometrie de la faille nord anatolienne á partir d’images Landsat MSS. Bull Soc Geol France 8:589–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şaroğlu F (1988) The age and offset on the North Anatolian Fault. METU J Pure Appl Sci 21:65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengör AMC (1979) The North Anatolian Transform Fault: its age, offset and tectonic significance. J Geol Soc London 136:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ŞengörAMC (1985) Türkiye’nin tektonik tarihinin yapısal sınıflaması: Türkiye jeol. Kur. Ketin Sempozyumu, 37–61

  • Şengör AMC, Görür N, Şaroğlu F (1985) Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study, In: Bidlle KT, Christie Blick N (eds.) Strike-slip faulting and basin formation, Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Sp. Pub., 37, pp. 227–264

  • Şengör AMC, Görür N, Polat A (1989) The Kırıkkale-Erbaa Fault Zone and the Alaca pull-apart basin: an inactive branch of North Anatolian Fault, Central Turkey, International Workshop on Active and Recent Strike-Slip Tectonics. Abstr, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Şengör AMC, Tüysüz O, İmren C, Sakınç M, Eyidoğan H, Görür N, Le Pichon X, Rangin C (2005) The North Anatolian Fault: a new look. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:37–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatar Y (1978) Tectonic study of Erzincan-Refahiye section of the North Anatolian Fault Zone. Hacettepe Univ Earth Sci 4:201–236 (in Turkish with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatar O, Gürsoy H, Piper JDA (2001) Differential neotectonic rotations in Anatolia and Tauride arc: palaeomagnetic investigations of the Erenlerdağ complex and Isparta volcanic district, south-central Turkey. EUG XI, Symposium LS03 Integrated Tectonic Studies of the Evolution of the Tethyan Orogenic Belt in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, April, Strasbourg, France, 322

  • Tatar O, Poyraz F, Gürsoy H, Çakır Z, Ergintav S, Akpınar Z, Koçbulut F, Sezen F, Türk T, Hastaoğlu KÖ, Polat A, Mesci BL, Gürsoy Ö, Ayazlı ĐE, Çakmak R, Belgen A, Yavaşoğlu H (2012) Crustal deformation and kinematics of the Eastern Part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) from GPS measurements. Tectonophysics 518–521:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taymaz T, Jacson J, McKenzie DP (1991) Active tectonics of the North and Central Aegean Sea. Geophys J Int 106:433–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokay M (1973) Geological observations on the North Anatolian Fault Zone between Gerede and Ilgaz. In: Proceedings of Symposium on North Anatolian Fault Zone and Earthquake Belt. Min. Res. Expl. Inst. Publ, Ankara, p 1229 (in Turkish with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Toprak V (1988) Neotectonics characteristics of the North Anatolian Fault Zone between Koyulhisar and Suşehri (NE Turkey). METU J Pure Appl Sci 21:155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüysüz O, Barka AA, Yiğitbaş E (1998) Geology of the Saros Graben its implications on the evolution of the North Anatolian Fault in the Ganos-Saros region NW Turkey. Tectonophysics 293:105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F (1993) A knowledge-based vision system for detecting land changes at urban fringes. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 31(1):136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westaway R (1994) Present day kinematics of the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean. J Geophys Res 99:12071–12090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaltırak C (1996) Tectonic history of the Ganos Fault System, Turkish Assoc. Petrol Geol Bull 8:137–156 (in Turkish with English Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavaşoğlu H, Tarı E, Tüysüz O, Çakır Z, Ergintav S (2011) Determining and modeling tectonic movements along the central part of the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey) using geodetic measurements. J Geodyn 51:339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaltırak C, Sakınç M, Oktay FY (2000) Kinematics and evolution of the northern segment of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Ganos Fault) in the area between Marmara and Gulf of Saroz, in Tatar, O., Kavak, K.Ş., Özden, S., (eds.), Tektonik Araştırma Grubu 3. Toplantısı, ATAG3 Proceedings, pp. 77–89 (in Turkish with English Abstract)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially by the Cumhuriyet University Research Fund under contract M-203 of project number.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaan Şevki Kavak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koçbulut, F., Kavak, K.Ş. & Tatar, O. Analysis of Ezinepazarı–Sungurlu Fault Zone (Turkey) using Landsat TM data and its kinematic implications. Arab J Geosci 8, 6425–6439 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1660-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1660-z

Keywords

Navigation