Abstract
Along its track between Samsun and Adana, an oil pipeline was planned to cross two active faults among others: Gokçe Fault located at 7 km south of Tokat and Karayaka Fault located at 45 km northeast of Tokat. Geological investigations suggest that both faults reveal reverse fault properties. Determination of the dip angles of the fault planes is crucial in pipeline construction. Fault plane dip angles can be best determined by seismic reflection methods. Although first few metres from the Earth’s surface are important in pipeline construction, few hundred metres of penetration depth are required for reliable fault identifications and fault-parameter computations. Two seismic profiles were accomplished on Gokçe and Karayaka faults. Computations based on seismic depth sections obtained in this study reveal that the apparent dip angle of Gokçe Fault is 84.6°, and the apparent dip angle of Karayaka Fault is 72.4°.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Sadi, H. N. (1982) Seismic exploration. Birkhauser Verlag
Badley, M. E., (1985) Practical seismic interpretation. IHRDC
Campbell FM, Kaiser A, Horstmeyer H, Green AG, Ghisetti F, Gorman AR, Finnemore M, Nobes DC (2010) Processing and preliminary interpretation of noisy high-resolution seismic reflection data across the active Ostler fault zone, South Island, New Zealand. J Appl Geophys 70(4):332–32
Canyaran L.,& Ecevitoğlu, B. (2002) Directional impulsive seismic energy source: Turkish Patent Institute, Ankara, Patent No. 2002/01203, 12 p
Clay, C. S. (1990) Elementary exploration seismology. Prentice-Hall Inc
Evans B. J. (1997) A handbook for seismic data acquisition. SEG
Juhlin C, Dehghannejad B, Lund B, Malehmir A, Pratt G (2010) Reflection seismic imaging of the end-glacial Pärvie fault system, Northern Sweden. J Appl Geophys 71(4):125–136
Karastathis VK, Ganas A, Makris J, Papoulia J, Dafnis P, Gerolymatou E, Drakatos G (2007) The application of shallow seismic techniques in the study of active faults: the Atalanti normal fault, Central Greece. J Appl Geophys 62:215–233
MTA, Geological map of Turkey (2003)
Ozcan A. & Aksay A. (1996) Geology of Tokat-Turhal-Almus-Camlibel environs (“Tokat-Turhal-Almus-Camlibel dolayinin jeolojisi”). MTA Report No: 9972
Sengbush, R. L. (1983) Seismic exploration methods. IHRDC
Sheriff, R. E. & Geldart, L. P. (1983) Exploration seismology: data processing and interpretation. Cambridge University Press
Sheriff, R. E.& Geldart, L. P. (1982) Exploration seismology: history, theory, and data acquisition. Cambridge University Press
Stone D. G. (1995) Designing seismic surveys in two and three dimensions. SEG
Tucker, P. M. & Yorston, H. J. (1982) Pitfalls in seismic interpretation. SEG
Waters, H. W. (1981) Reflection seismology. John Wiley and Sons
Yilmaz, O. 1987. Seismic data processing. SEG
Acknowledgments
This work has been performed within the cooperative work of the Ankara University Geophysics and Energy and Environmental Investments Inc. (ENVY). We acknowledge with gratitude the technical and financial support of ENVY Inc. The authors also give thanks to the stuff of General Directorate of Disaster Affairs Earthquake Research Department for providing seismic recording instruments and their technical support in the field.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aldas, G.U., Ecevitoglu, B. & Saroglu, F. Determination of the dip angles of Karayaka and Gokçe fault planes in Turkey by seismic reflection method. Arab J Geosci 8, 6385–6397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1635-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1635-0