Skip to main content
Log in

Variability in Breeding Pool of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for Yield, Quality and Resistance to Different Biotic and Abiotic Stress Factors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The understanding on the available genetic variability in the breeding pool aids the breeder to choose better parental combinations for the desired genetic improvement in crop plants. The variability present in the National Hybridisation Garden (NHG) of sugarcane in India at Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore with an assemblage of 606 clones of sugarcane cultivars and other elite hybrids were studied for cane yield components, juice quality parameters and their level of resistance against red rot. The data on smut resistance, tolerance to stalk borer and tolerance to different abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, water logging, low temperature, high temperature and winter ratooning ability of these clones to be used parental clones were collected from the available literature. Significant leptokurtic distribution for the cane characters and right skewed distribution for juice quality traits were observed in this breeding pool. Correlation studies indicated that selection of parents contributing to high cane height and high number of millable canes (NMC) would result in progeny with high single cane weight (SCW) and cane yield because, the SCW was negatively correlated with NMC and cane thickness. Clones with high per se performance for important yield contributing characters were identified which are potential parents for yield improvement. For sucrose content, a highly heritable trait in sugarcane, nineteen clones with high juice sucrose of more than 20 % were found to be suitable as parents for quality enhancement. One hundred and thirty-seven clones were found as either resistant (R) or moderately Rto the most virulent races of red rot pathogen by testing with mixed inoculum of Cf 671 and Cf 94012 isolates. Screening of the clones for pollen fertility inferred that NHG has higher number of clones that can be used as female parent than as male parent. The synchrony in flowering of female and male parental clones with desirable traits of interest and the combining ability of the clones are also discussed in this paper. The critical consideration of the different parameters in choosing suitable parental clones in crossing programme will help in rapid varietal improvement for cane and sugar yield as well as to enhance the resistance against different biotic and abiotic stresses for increased sugarcane productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, A.O., and A. Obeid. 2012. Investigation on variability, broad sense heritability and genetic advance in sugarcane (Saccharum spp). International Journal of Agricultural Science 2(9): 839–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appunu, C., and M.N. Premachandran. 2012. Choice of parental clones in sugarcane breeding programme at Coimbatore in evolving Co canes—A retrospection. In Proceedings of the international symposium on new paradigms in sugarcane research, eds. R. Viswanathan, G. Hemaprabha, A. Bhaskaran, K.Mohanraj, V. Jayakumar, T. Ramasubramanian and N.V. Nair, 11–12. Coimbatore: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.

  • Alarmelu, S., G. Hemaprabha, R. Nagarajan, and R.M. Shanthi. 2010a. Combining ability for yield and quality in sugarcane. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4): 742–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alarmelu, S., R. Nagarajan, R.M. Shanthi, D. Mohanraj, and P. Padmanabhan. 2010b. A study on genetics of red rot resistance in sugarcane. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4): 656–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1980–2010. Annual reports, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, India.

  • Chen, J.C.P., and C.C. Chou. 1993. Cane sugar hand book, 12th ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazaffi, R., K.M. Oliveira, A.P. Souza, and A.A.F. Garia. 2010. The importance of the germplasm in developing agro-energetic profile sugarcane cultivars. In Sugar cane bioethanol: R&D for productivity and sustainability, ed. L.A.B. Cortez, 333–343. Sao Paulo: Blucher. ISBN: 978821205302.

  • Hapase, R.S. 2012. Breeding strategies for improving productivity and diseases resistance. In Sugarcane breeders and pathologist meet, ed. N.V. Nair, R. Viswanathan, P. Govindaraj, and K. Mohanraj, 86–87. Sugarcane Breeding Institute: Coimbatore. ISBN 978-81-904359-6-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, D.J., and T.I. Tew. 1987. Hybridisation procedure. In Sugarcane improvement through breeding, ed. D.J. Heinz. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemaprabha, G., U.S. Natarajan, and N. Balasundaram. 2003. Breeding behaviour for juice quality through selfing and progeny evaluation in hybrid clones and inbred derivatives of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Sugar Tech 5(3): 177–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemaprabha, G., R. Nagarajan, S. Alarmelu, and U.S. Natarajan. 2006. Parental potential of sugarcane clones for drought resistance breeding. Sugar Tech 8: 59–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemaprabha G., T.S. Sarath, S.Alarmelu, A. S. Pazhany, R.M.Shanthi, and C. Appunu. 2012. An assessment of high temperature tolerance potential of elite genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) evaluated in Peninsular Zone of India. In Proceedings of the international symposium on new paradigms in sugarcane research, eds. R. Viswanathan, G. Hemaprabha, A. Bhaskaran, K. Mohanraj, V. Jayakumar, T. Ramasubramanian and N.V. Nair, 125–126. Coimbatore: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.

  • Hogarth, D.M., and J.C. Skinner. 1987. Computerisation of parental selection. Copersucar international sugarcane breeding workshop, 87–101. Piracicaba-S.P. Brasil: Copersucar Technology Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadian, S.P., R. Pal, and Y.S. Lather. 2006. Correlation and path efficient analysis in sugarcane. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 40(2): 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, N.V., N. Balasundaram, and K.G. Somarajan. 1985. Flowering behaviour of Indian commercial hybrids of sugarcane under Cannanore conditions. The Indian Sugar Crops Journal 11(1–4): 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, N.V. 2012. Sugarcane genetic resources—Status, potential and role in sugarcane improvement. Journal of Sugarcane Research 2(2): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan, U.S., N. Balasundaram, T.C. Ramana Rao, P. Padmanabhan, D. Mohanraj, S. Karthikeyan, and S. Damodaran. 2001. Role of Saccharum spontaneum in imparting stable resistance against red rot. Sugar Cane International 27: 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panse, V.G., and P.V. Sukhatme. 1978. Statistical methods for agricultural workers, 359. ICAR: New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B. 2005. Estimation of genetic parameters in different environments and their implications in sugarcane breeding. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 65(3): 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B., and G. Hemaprabha. 2000. Combining ability and heterosis for cane yield and juice quality traits in progenies of sugarcane clones involving Saccharum robustum. Sugar Cane International 2: 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B., and B.K. Sahi. 2001. Sources of resistance against red pathogen (Colletotrichum falcatum Went) in sugarcane. Plant Disease Research 16: 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B., N. Singh, and B.K. Sahi. 2005a. Combining ability and heterosis for disease index of red rot in sugarcane (Sacchrum officinarum L.). Indian Journal Genetics and Plant Breeding 65: 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B., B.K. Sahi, G. Hemaprabha, and P. Kumar. 2005b. Effect of ratooning during winter and spring on selection in sugarcane seedlings. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 20(1&2): 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, J.T. 1989. Sugarcane Origin, Taxonomy, Breeding and Varieties. In Sugarcane varietal improvement. eds. K.M. Naidu, T.V. Sreenivasan, and M.N. Premachandran, 83–113. Coimbatore: Sugarcane Breeding Institute.

  • Ravinder Kumar, K. Mohanraj, A. Anna Durai, and M.N. Premachandran. 2012. Pedigree analysis of sugarcane parent breeding pool used in evolving ‘Co’ varieties in India. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 72(1): 61–71.

  • Shanthi, R.M., S. Alarmelu, and R. Balakrishnan. 2005. Role of female parents in the inheritance of brix in early selection stages of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 7: 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu, S.K., K.S. Thind, and P. Singh. 2012. Variability trends for brix content in general cross combinations of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. Complex). World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(1): 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvi, A., N.V. Nair, J.L. Noyer, N.K. Singh, N. Balasundaram, K.C. Bansal, K.R. Koundal, and T. Mahapatra. 2006. AFLP analysis of the phenetic organisation and genetic diversity in sugarcane complex Saccharum and Erianthus. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 1221–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, A.P., and P. Lal. 2007. Correlation and path co-efficient analysis in sugarcane. The South Pacific Journal of Natural Science 1: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, R. 2010. Plant diseases: red rot of sugarcane, 306. New Delhi: Anmol Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. N. Vijayan Nair, Director Sugarcane Breeding Institute for necessary facilities and Dr. G. Hemaprabha, Head, Breeding Section, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore for the logistic support and suggestions given during the course of the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Anna Durai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anna Durai, A., Premachandran, M.N., Govindaraj, P. et al. Variability in Breeding Pool of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) for Yield, Quality and Resistance to Different Biotic and Abiotic Stress Factors. Sugar Tech 17, 107–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0301-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0301-x

Keywords

Navigation