Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Vinasse and Press Mud Application on the Biological Properties of Soils and Productivity of Sugarcane

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study has been conducted to investigate the effects of vinasse and press mud (PM) (sugar industry by-products) applications on sugarcane soil microbial population, its enzyme activities and biomass carbon and nitrogen in order to work out its potential to be used as bio-friendly fertilizer. The treatments were compared with traditional chemical fertilizer (CF) applications. Vinasse and PM amended soils were found to have slightly lower pH and higher total N and C content, however, the difference was insignificant with CF amended soils. Both the treatments increased sugarcane yield compared to chemical fertilizer, but this increase was not significant in PM amended soils. The populations of fungi, bacteria and actinomycetes increased in vinasse and PM amended soils. This increase in former one was significant in PM amended soils only, and that of the latter in vinasse amended soil. The biomass C and N contents were also higher in both the treatments, however, only the former one had significant difference with CF. Amongst the soil enzymes, the activities of cellulase, phosphatase and aminopeptidase were significantly higher in PM treatment while these were at par in vinasse and CF treatments. These results showed a potential possibility of substituting chemical fertilizers with vinasse and press mud which besides improving soil health and enhancing sugarcane productivity, can also solve the problem of their disposal in free environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alef, K., P. Nannipieri, and C. Trazar-Cepeda. 1995. Phosphatase activity. In Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry, ed. K. Alef, and P. Nannipieri, 335–3344. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amador, J.A., A.M. Glucksman, J.B. Lyons, and J.H. Gores. 1997. Spatial distribution of soil phosphatase activity within a riparian forest. Soil Science 162: 808–825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, P.C., A. Landman, G. Pruden, and D.S. Jenkinson. 1985. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 17: 837–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E.H., R.S. Chung, and F.N. Wang. 2008. Effect of different types of organic fertilizers on the chemical properties and enzymatic activities of an oxisol under intensive cultivation of vegetables for 4 years. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 54: 587–599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordovil, C., F. Cabral, and J. Coutinho. 2007. Potential mineralisation of nitrogen from organic wastes to ryegrass and wheat crops. Bioresource Technology 98: 3265–3268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Varies, F.T., J. Bloem, N. van Eekeren, L. Brusaard, and E. Hoffland. 2007. Fungal biomass in pastures increase with age and reduced N input. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39: 1620–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W.A., L. Cheng, and P. Wang. 2000. Soil acid and alkaline phosphatase activity as pH adjustment indicators. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1915–1919.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinesh, R., S.G. Chaudhuri, A.N. Ganeshamurthy, and S.C. Pramanik. 2004. Biochemical properties of soils of undisturbed and disturbed mangrove forests of South Andaman (India). Wetlands Ecology and Management 12: 309–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gil, J.C., C. Plaza, P. Soler-Rovira, and A. Polo. 2000. Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1907–1913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Stotres, F., C. Trasar-Cepeda, M.C. Leiros, and S. Seoane. 2005. Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37: 877–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, T.S., and C.W. Honeycutt. 2000. Using growing degree days to predict nitrogen availability from livestock manures. New England Plant Soil and Water Lab. University of Maine. Forest Experiment Station Journal No. 2394.

  • Hargreaves, P.R., P.C. Brookes, G.J.S. Ross, and P.R. Poulton. 2003. Evaluating soil microbial biomass carbon as an indicator of long-term environmental change. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41: 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insam, H., D. Parkinson, and K.H. Domsh. 1989. Influence of macroclimate on soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 21: 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa, S., G.H. An, and K. Toshiyuki. 2005. Effects curtailment of nitrogen fertilizer on biological properties and tea leaf yield in acid tea field soils. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 51: 675–677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leita, L., M. De Nobili, C. Mondini, G. Mühlbachová, L. Marchiol, G. Bragato, and M. Contin. 1999. Influence of inorganic and organic fertilization on soil microbial biomass, metabolic quotient and heavy metal bioavailability. Biology and Fertility of Soil 28: 371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.R. 2004. China: an emerging sugar super power. Sugar Tech 6(4): 213–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.R., Q.Z. Zhu, W.Z. Wang, and S. Solomon. 2007. Pre-emergence application of vinasse on sugarcane growth and sugar productivity in China. Sugar Tech 9(2&3): 160–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loll, M.J., and J.M. Bollag. 1983. Protein transformation in soil. Advances in Agronomy 6: 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.P. 1950. Use of acid, rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Science 69: 215–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita, S. 1997. Methods of soil microbiology, 55–61. Japan: Yokendo LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsabimana, D., R.J. Haynes, and F.M. Wallis. 2004. Size, activity and catabolic diversity of the soil microbial biomass as affected by land use. Applied Soil Ecology 26: 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou, S.B., H. Yang, H.Q. Liang, H.Z. Zhou, and Z.M. Fang. 2002. Review and prospect of vinasse management technology of China. Guangxi Journal of Light Industry 4: 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pansombat, K., S. Kanazawa, and T. Horiguchi. 1996. Microbial ecology in tea soils 1. Soil properties and microbial populations. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 43: 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pansombat, K., S. Kanazawa, and T. Horiguchi. 1997. Microbial ecology in tea soils 2. Soil protease activity. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 43: 431–438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perucci, P. 1992. Enzyme activity and microbial biomass in a field soil amended with municipal refuse. Biology and Fertility of Soils 14: 54–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raupp, J. 2005. Nitrogen mineralisation of farmyard manure, faba bean meal, alfalfa meal and castor meal under controlled conditions in incubation tests. Ende der Nische, Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau.

  • Spedding, T.A., C. Hamel, G.R. Mehuys, and C.A. Madramootoo. 2004. Soil microbial dynamics in maize growing soil under different tillage and residue management systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36: 499–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su, T.M., Y.R. Li, Y.L. Mo, C.Y. Lu, G.P. Wei, and Z.P. Jiang. 2009a. Effect of vinasse application on the agronomic characters of sugarcane. Chinese Journal of Soil Science 40(2): 276–278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su, T.M., Y.R. Li, G.P. Wei, and Z.P. Jiang. 2009b. Effect of sugarcane vinasse on soil physicochemical properties and oxidoreductase enzymes. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 17(6): 1106–1110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su, T.M., Y.L. Mo, Y.R. Li, G.P. Wei, and Z.P. Jiang. 2008. Effect of vinasse application on hydrolytic enzyme activity of soil. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica 17(3): 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truog, E. 1930. The determination of the readily available phosphorus of soils. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 22: 874–882.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, E.D., P.C. Brookes, and D.S. Jenkison. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19: 703–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., and G.L. Zhang. 2003. Microbial biomass carbon of soils as affected by rubber cultivation. Pedosphere 13: 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T.Q., C.F. Drury, and B.D. Kay. 2004. Soil dissolved organic carbon: influences of water-filled pore space and red clover addition and relationships with microbial biomass carbon. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 84: 151–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q.Z., Y.R. Li, W.Z. Wang, and J. Liao. 2009. Effect of continual quantitative rational application of vinasse in sugarcane field. Sugar Crops of China 2: 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Postdoctoral Research Grant (No.77686), National Scientific R&D Program (No. 2007BAD30B00), International Scientific Cooperation Program projects (2008DFA30600, 2009DFA30820), 948 Program (No. 2009-Z8), Guangxi Scientific R&D Program (No. 0782004) and Guangxi Educational Key Program (No. 201102ZD003). The authors are grateful to Mr. Guang-Po Wei, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, for his assistance in sampling the soils.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang-Rui Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, SD., Liu, JX., Wu, J. et al. Effects of Vinasse and Press Mud Application on the Biological Properties of Soils and Productivity of Sugarcane. Sugar Tech 15, 152–158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0200-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0200-y

Keywords

Navigation