Skip to main content
Log in

Review of cardiovascular imaging in The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2014: Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

In this new feature of The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology we will summarize key articles that were published in the Journal in the previous year. In the first article of this 2-part series we concentrated on publications dealing with cardiac positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and neuronal imaging. This review will focus on myocardial perfusion imaging summarizing advances in the field including in diagnosis, prognosis, appropriateness, and safety of testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw LJ, Hage FG, Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Iskandrian A. Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be? J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:1026-43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katsikis A, Theodorakos A, Papaioannou S, Tsapaki V, Kolovou G, Drosatos A, et al. Long-term prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians able to undergo treadmill exercise stress testing. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:1213-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rozanski A, Gransar H, Min JK, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, et al. Long-term mortality following normal exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT according to coronary disease risk factors. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:341-50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Acampa W, Petretta M, Cuocolo R, Daniele S, Cantoni V, Cuocolo A. Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:50-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Acampa W, Cantoni V, Green R, Maio F, Daniele S, Nappi C, et al. Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:893-902, quiz 890-2, 903-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Padala SK, Ghatak A, Padala S, Katten DM, Polk DM, Heller GV. Cardiovascular risk stratification in diabetic patients following stress single-photon emission-computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: the impact of achieved exercise level. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:1132-43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen J, Garcia EV, Bax JJ, Iskandrian AE, Borges-Neto S, Soman P. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:685-94.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salimian S, Thibault B, Finnerty V, Gregoire J, Harel F. The effects of dobutamine stress on cardiac mechanical synchrony determined by phase analysis of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in a canine model. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:375-83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zafrir N, Nevzorov R, Bental T, Strasberg B, Gutstein A, Mats I, et al. Prognostic value of left ventricular dyssynchrony by myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT in patients with normal and abnormal left ventricular functions. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:532-40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hage FG, Aggarwal H, Patel K, Chen J, Jacobson AF, Heo J, et al. The relationship of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and cardiac sympathetic denervation to potential sudden cardiac death events in systolic heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:78-85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg AS, Alraies MC, Cerqueira MD, Jaber WA, Aljaroudi WA. Prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with ejection fraction 35-50% and QRS < 150 ms. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:57-66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aggarwal H, AlJaroudi WA, Mehta S, Mannon R, Heo J, Iskandrian AE, et al. The prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:739-46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang WS, Huang CH, Lee CL, Chen CP, Hung GU, Chen J. Relation of early post-stress left ventricular dyssynchrony and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:1048-56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Hou X, Wang Y, Xue S, Cao K, Chen J, et al. The acute and chronic effects of different right ventricular site pacing on left ventricular mechanical synchrony as assessed by phase analysis of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:958-66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patil HR, Bateman TM, McGhie AI, Burgett EV, Courter SA, Case JA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution attenuation-corrected Anger-camera SPECT in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:127-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mut F, Giubbini R, Vitola J, Lusa L, Sobic-Saranovic D, Peix A, et al. Detection of post-exercise stunning by early gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: results from the IAEA multi-center study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:1168-76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nudi F, Pinto A, Procaccini E, Neri G, Vetere M, Tomai F, et al. A novel clinically relevant segmentation method and corresponding maximal ischemia score to risk-stratify patients undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:807-18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fransson H, Ljungberg M, Carlsson M, Engblom H, Arheden H, Heiberg E. Validation of an automated method to quantify stress-induced ischemia and infarction in rest-stress myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:503-18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takamine S, Fujiwara S, Shigeru M, Ito T, Kawai H, Shiotani H, et al. Relationship of decreased accumulation of (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin on myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography images between QRS duration in dilated cardiomyopathy patient with left bundle branch block. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:1023-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mouden M, Ottervanger JP, Timmer JR, Reiffers S, Oostdijk AH, Knollema S, et al. The influence of coronary calcium score on the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:368-74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ather S, Iqbal F, Gulotta J, Aljaroudi W, Heo J, Iskandrian AE, et al. Comparison of three commercially available softwares for measuring left ventricular perfusion and function by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:673-81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ronan G, Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:192-220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Winchester DE, Hymas J, Meral R, Nguyen D, Dusaj R, Shaw LJ, et al. Clinician-dependent variations in inappropriate use of myocardial perfusion imaging: training, specialty, and location. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:598-604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yokota S, Ottervanger JP, Mouden M, Timmer JR, Knollema S, Jager PL. Prevalence, location, and extent of significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:284-90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsi DH, Marreddy R, Moshiyakhov M, Luft U. Regadenoson induced acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary thrombosis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20:481-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shah S, Parra D, Rosenstein RS. Acute myocardial infarction during regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:e90-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenblatt J, Mooney D, Dunn T, Cohen M. Asystole following regadenoson infusion in stable outpatients. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:862-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Agarwal V, DePuey EG. Regadenoson and seizures: a real clinical concern. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:869-70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hage FG. Regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging: is it safe? J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:871-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hage FG, Iskandrian AE. Serious complications associated with regadenoson administration for myocardial perfusion imaging: a commentary. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:877-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Dr. Hage has received grant support from Astellas Pharma US.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadi G. Hage MD, FASH, FACC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hage, F.G., AlJaroudi, W.A. Review of cardiovascular imaging in The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2014: Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 22, 714–719 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0144-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0144-1

Keywords

Navigation