Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cerebellar Control on Prefrontal-Motor Connectivity During Movement Inhibition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests a crucial role of right inferior frontal gyrus (r-IFG) and right pre-supplementary motor area (r-preSMA) in movement inhibition control. The present work was aimed to investigate how the effective connectivity between these prefrontal areas and the primary motor cortex could change depending on the activity of the cerebellar cortex. Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered in healthy subjects over the r-IFG/left primary motor area (l-M1) and over r-preSMA/l-M1 before (100 ms after the fixation cross onset) and 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 ms after the presentation of a Go/NoGo visual cue establishing the specific time course and the causal interactions of these regions in relation to l-M1 as measured by motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The same paired-pulse protocol was applied following sham or real cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). Following sham cTBS, for NoGo trials only, MEPs collected showed the expected pattern of activation for both r-IFG-l-M1 and r-preSMA-l-M1 connectivity, characterized by peaks of increased and decreased MEP amplitude regularly repeated every 50 ms. Following cerebellar cTBS, this pattern of activation related to NoGo trials was modified selectively for the r-IFG-M1 but not for r-preSMA-M1 connection. A common monitoring action of r-IFG and r-preSMA in inhibitory control was confirmed. The effects of cerebellar cTBS showed a specific interaction between cerebellum and r-IFG activity during the inhibitory process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Obeso I, Wilkinson L, Casabona E, Bringas ML, Álvarez M, Álvarez L, et al. Deficits in inhibitory control and conflict resolution on cognitive and motor tasks in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res 2011; doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2736-6

  2. Aron AR, Behrens TE, Smith S, Frank MJ, Poldrack RA. Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI. J Neurosci. 2007;27:3743–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duann JR, Ide JS, Luo X, Li CS. Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition. J Neurosci 2009; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1300-09.2009.

  4. Tabu H, Mima T, Aso T, Takahashi R, Fukuyama H. Common inhibitory prefrontal activation during inhibition of hand and foot responses. Neuroimage 2012; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.092

  5. Picazio S, Veniero D, Ponzo V, Caltagirone C, Gross J, Thut G, et al. Prefrontal control over motor cortex cycles at beta frequency during movement inhibition. Curr Biol 2014; doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.043

  6. Picazio S, Koch G. Is Motor Inhibition Mediated by Cerebello-Cortical Interactions? Cerebellum 2015; doi:10.1007/s12311-014-0609-9.

  7. Tanaka H, Harada M, Arai M, Hirata K. Cognitive dysfunction in cortical cerebellar atrophy correlates with impairment of the inhibitory system. Neuropsychobiology. 2003;47:206–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith AM, Walker LA, Freedman MS, DeMeulemeester C, Hogan MJ, Cameron I. fMRI investigation of disinhibition in cognitively impaired patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2009; doi:10.1016/j.jns.2009.02.366

  9. Hester R, Garavan H. Executive dysfunction in cocaine addiction: evidence for discordant frontal, cingulate, and cerebellar activity. J Neurosci. 2004;24:11017–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Behan B, Connolly CG, Datwani S, Doucet M, Ivanovic J, Morioka R, et al. Response inhibition and elevated parietal-cerebellar correlations in chronic adolescent cannabis users. Neuropharmacology 2014; doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.05.027

  11. Rubia K, Smith AB, Taylor E, Brammer M. Linear age correlated functional development of right inferior frontostriato-cerebellar networks during response inhibition and anterior cingulate during error-related processes. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28:1163–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirose S, Jimura K, Kunimatsu A, Abe O, Ohtomo K, Miyashita Y, et al. Changes in cerebro-cerebellar interaction during response inhibition after performance improvement. Neuroimage 2014; doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.007

  13. Picazio S, Oliveri M, Koch G, Caltagirone C, Petrosini L. Cerebellar contribution to mental rotation: a cTBS study. Cerebellum 2013; doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0494-7

  14. Daly E, Ecker C, Hallahan B, Deeley Q, Craig M, Murphy C, et al. Response inhibition and serotonin in autism: a functional MRI study using acute tryptophan depletion. Brain 2014; doi:10.1093/brain/awu178

  15. Koch G, Mori F, Marconi B, Codecà C, Pecchioli C, Salerno S, et al. Changes in intracortical circuits of the human motor cortex following theta burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum. Clin Neurophysiol 2008. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.08.008.

  16. Pandey AK, Kamarajan C, Tang Y, Chorlian DB, Roopesh BN, Manz N, et al. Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol 2012; doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.009.

  17. Baümer T, Schippling S, Kroeger J, Zittel S, Koch G, Thomalla G, et al. Inhibitory and facilitatory connectivity from ventral premotor to primary motor cortex in healthy humans at rest—a bifocal TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1724–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ugawa Y, Lu MK, Bliem B, Murakami T, MullerDahlhaus F, Arai N, et al. State-dependent and timing- dependent bidirectional associative plasticity in the human SMA-M1 network. J Neurosc. 2011;31:15376–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, Caramia MD, Caruso G, Cracco RQ, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:79–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koch G, Cercignani M, Pecchioli C, Versace V, Oliveri M, Caltagirone C, et al. In vivo definition of parieto-motor connections involved in planning of grasping movements. NeuroImage. 2010;51:300–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koch G, Ponzo V, Di Lorenzo F, Caltagirone C, Veniero D. Hebbian and anti-Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human cortico-cortical connections. J Neurosci. 2013;33:9725–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nachev P, Kennard C, Husain M. Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; doi:10.1038/nrn2478

  23. Del Olmo MF, Cheeran B, Koch G, Rothwell JC. Role of the cerebellum in externally paced rhythmic finger movements. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:145–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rothwell JC. Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 1997;74:113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koch G, Brusa L, Carrillo F, Lo Gerfo E, Torriero S, Oliveri M, et al. Cerebellar magnetic stimulation decreases levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2009; doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ad5387.

  26. Allen GI, Tsukahara N. Cerebrocerebellar communication systems. Physiol Rev. 1974;54:957–1006.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelly RM, Strick PL. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8432–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL. Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal ganglia. Trends Cogn Sci 2013; doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.003.

  29. Lamar M, Cutter WJ, Rubia K, Brammer M, Daly EM, Craig MC, et al. 5-HT, prefrontal function and aging: fMRI of inhibition and acute tryptophan depletion. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:1135–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Halko MA, Farzan F, Eldaief MC, Schmahmann JD, Pascual-Leone A. Intermittent theta-burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum increases functional connectivity of the default network. J Neurosci 2014; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1776-14.2014.

  31. Mostofsky SH, Schafer JG, Abrams MT, Goldberg MC, Flower AA, Boyce A, et al. fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003;17:419–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li CS, Huang C, Constable RT, Sinha R. Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing. J Neurosci. 2006;26:186–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. van der Salm SM, van der Meer JN, Nederveen AJ, Veltman DJ, van Rootselaar AF, Tijssen MA. Functional MRI study of response inhibition in myoclonus dystonia. Exp Neurol. 2013; doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.02.017.

  34. Obeso I, Robles N, Marrón EM, Redolar-Ripoll D. Dissociating the Role of the pre-SMA in Response Inhibition and Switching: A Combined Online and Offline TMS Approach. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00150

  35. Middleton FA, Strick PL. Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function. Science. 1994;266:458–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Koziol LF, Budding D, Andreasen N, D’Arrigo S, Bulgheroni S, Imamizu H, et al. Consensus paper: the cerebellum's role in movement and cognition. Cerebellum 2014; doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0511-x

  37. Existing motor state is favored at the expense of new movement during 13–35 Hz oscillatory synchrony in the human corticospinal system. J Neurosci 2005;25:7771–9

  38. Pogosyan A, Gaynor LD, Eusebio A, Brown P. Boosting cortical activity at Beta-band frequencies slows movement in humans. Curr Biol 2009; doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.074

  39. Joundi RA, Jenkinson N, Brittain JS, Aziz TZ, Brown P. Driving oscillatory activity in the human cortex enhances motor performance. Curr Biol 2012; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.024

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Italian Ministry of Health to G.K. (239/BR-2009-1591859).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Clinical and Behavioral Neurology Department, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179, Rome, Italy

    Silvia Picazio, Viviana Ponzo & Giacomo Koch

  2. Stroke Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Policlinic Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy

    Giacomo Koch

Authors
  1. Silvia Picazio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Viviana Ponzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giacomo Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Picazio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has a conflict of interest with respect to the purposes of the present study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Picazio, S., Ponzo, V. & Koch, G. Cerebellar Control on Prefrontal-Motor Connectivity During Movement Inhibition. Cerebellum 15, 680–687 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-015-0731-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-015-0731-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation