Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro propagation of Rudraksha (Elaeocarpus sphaericus (Gaertn.) K. Schum): a biotechnological approach for conservation

  • Short communication
  • Published:
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The species Elaeocarpus sphaericus (Rudraksha) is a religious, medicinally important threatened tree of India. An efficient micropropagation protocol has been developed from nodal explants of this plant species collected from north-east India for large scale production of planting material at favourable sites within the country. Best shoot initiation occurred in MS medium supplemented with 2.2μM BA+2.2μM Kn in combination. Addition of Casein Hydrolysate (CH) (100mg/L) increased the shoot number. Microshoots excised and subcultured in 2.0μM BA further enhanced growth and multiplication. The shoot cultures were maintained in this concentration for 2years with subculturing at 6weeks interval. MS medium containing 5.0μM NAA was most effective for rooting. Successfully acclimatized plants (80%) showed normal growth under suitable habitat conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Abbreviations

BA:

6-Benzyladenine

CH:

Casein Hydrolysate

IBA:

Indole-3-butyric Acid

Kn:

Kinetin

MS:

Murashige and Skoog medium

NAA:

Naphthalene Acetic Acid

PGRs:

Plant Growth Regulators

RH:

Relative Humidity

References

  • Arshad SM, Kumar A (2006) Tissue culture investigation of Elaeocarpus tuberculatus-a highly valued rudraksha. Vegetos-An Int J Plant Res 19:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhojvaid PP, Negi S (2003) Propagation of Elaeocarpus ganitrus by air layering. Indian Forester 129:1185–1191

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Bari MA, Roy M, Bhadra SK (2009) Clonal propagation through nodal explant culture of Boerhaavia diffusa L.-a rare medicinal plant. Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol 19:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan JMS, Bisht P, Panwar M, Thakur A (2015) In vitro propagation of Elaeocarpus sphaericus. Indian Forester 141:173–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan ML, Bhuyan P, Tripathi RS (2003) Regeneration of rudraksh (Elaeocarpus ganitrus roxb.) a threatened tree species: germination strategies. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 29:255–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan ML, Bhuyan P, Tripathi RS (2004) Conservation status of rudraksh in tropical wet evergreen forests of Arunachal Pradesh. Curr Sci 86:646–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Khare CP (2004) Encyclopedia of medicinal plants. Springer publication, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khare CP (2007) Indian medicinal plants, an illustrated dictionary. Springer Science, Springer Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 232–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Li J, Liu B, Zhuo J, Long C (2014) Seeds used for Bodhi beads in China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomedicine 10:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog FA (1962) Revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murti SK (1993) Family elaeocarpaceae in India - census and observations. J Econ Taxon Bot 17:283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Amin MN, Ahmad S (2003) Rapid clonal propagation of native olive (Elaeocarpus robustus roxb.) using tissue culture technique. J Biol Sci 3:1107–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao RR, Haridasan K (1983) Threatened plants of Meghalaya – a plea for conservation. In: Jain SK, Rao RR (eds) An assessment of threatened plants of India. Botanical Survey of India, Howrah, pp. 94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Islam M, Hadiuzzaman S (1998) Micropropagation of Elaeocarpus robustus roxb. Plant Cell Rep 17:810–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saklani K, Prasad P, Nautiyal AR (2015) Ethnomedicinal importance of rudraksha (Elaeocarpus sphaericus (gaertn.) K. Schum.), related species and their conservation strategies: a review. Indian J For 38(1):1–10

  • Singh A (2015) Micropropagation of Plants. In: Bir Bahadur et al. (eds) Plant Biology and Biotechnology: Volume II: Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Springer New Delhi Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London

  • Singh B, Rethy P, Gangawar HS, Gajural PR (1999) Seasonal variation in rooting behaviour of air layered branches in rudraksh. J Non-Timber For Prod 6:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar TM, Aswath CR (2014) Review on medicinal plants propagation: a comprehensive study on role of natural organic extracts in tissue culture medium. Am J Plant Sci 5:3073–3088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Staden J, Zazimalova E, George EF (2008) Plant growth regulators II: cytokinins, their analogues and antagonists. In: George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk GJ (eds) Plant propagation by tissue culture, 3rd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 205–226

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Director, High Altitude Plant Physiology Research Centre (HAPPRC), is gratefully acknowledged for providing experimental facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay K. Purohit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saklani, K., Singh, S., Purohit, V.K. et al. In vitro propagation of Rudraksha (Elaeocarpus sphaericus (Gaertn.) K. Schum): a biotechnological approach for conservation. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 21, 611–615 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-015-0316-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-015-0316-0

Keywords

Navigation