Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Comprehensive Check at the Blood Bank Reception on Blood Requisitions in Detecting Potential Transfusion Errors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pre-transfusion testing includes proper requisitions, compatibility testing and pre-release checks. Proper labelling of samples and blood units and accurate patient details check helps to minimize the risk of errors in transfusion. This study was aimed to identify requisition errors before compatibility testing. The study was conducted in the blood bank of a tertiary care hospital in north India over a period of 3 months. The requisitions were screened at the reception counter and inside the pre-transfusion testing laboratory for errors. This included checking the Central Registration number (C.R. No.) and name of patient on the requisition form and the sample label; appropriateness of sample container and sample label; incomplete requisitions; blood group discrepancy. Out of the 17,148 blood requisitions, 474 (2.76 %) requisition errors were detected before the compatibility testing. There were 192 (1.11 %) requisitions where the C.R. No. on the form and the sample were not tallying and in 70 (0.40 %) requisitions patient’s name on the requisition form and the sample were different. Highest number of requisitions errors were observed in those received from the Emergency and Trauma services (27.38 %) followed by Medical wards (15.82 %) and the lowest number (3.16 %) of requisition errors were observed from Hematology and Oncology wards. C.R. No. error was the most common error observed in our study. Thus a careful check of the blood requisitions at the blood bank reception counter helps in identifying the potential transfusion errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sazama K (1990) Reports of 355 transfusion-associated deaths: 1976 through 1985. Transfusion 30:583–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dzik WH (2006) New technology for transfusion safety. Br J Haematol 136:181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Myhre BA, McRuer D (2000) Human error—a significant cause of transfusion mortality. Transfusion 40:879–885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dzik WS, Beckman N, Selleng K et al (2008) Errors in patient specimen collection: application of statistical process control. Transfusion 48:2143–2151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Porras JRG, Graciani IF, Alvarez M et al (2008) Tubes for pretransfusion testing should be collected by blood bank staff and hand labelled until the implementation of new technology for improved sample labelling. Results of a prospective study. Vox Sang 95:52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lumadue JA, Boyd JS, Ness PM (1997) Adherence to a strict specimen-labeling policy decreases the incidence of erroneous blood grouping of blood bank specimens. Transfusion 37:1169–1172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma RR, Kumar S, Agnihotri SK (2001) Sources of preventable errors related to transfusion. Vox Sang 81:37–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varey A, Tinegate H, Robertson J, Watson D, Iqbal A (2013) Factors predisposing to wrong blood in tube incidents: a year’s experience in the North East of England. Transfus Med. doi:10.1111/tme.12050

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lundy D, Laspina S, Kaplan H et al (2007) Seven hundred and fifty-nine (759) chances to learn: a 3-year pilot project to analyse transfusion-related near-miss events in the Republic of Ireland. Vox Sang 92:233–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. British Committee for Standards in Haematology (1996) (BCSH) Guidelines for pre-transfusion compatibility procedures in blood transfusion laboratories. Transfus Med 6:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murphy MF, Stearn BE, Dziky WH (2004) Current performance of patient sample collection in the UK. Transfus Med 14:113–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Engelfriet CP, Reessink HW (2004) International forum: transfusion safety in the hospital. Vox Sang 87:48–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, A., Kumari, S., Marwaha, N. et al. The Role of Comprehensive Check at the Blood Bank Reception on Blood Requisitions in Detecting Potential Transfusion Errors. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 31, 269–274 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-014-0444-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-014-0444-7

Keywords

Navigation