Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosis of Dermatophytosis

  • Advances in Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections (U Binder, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Fungal Infection Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dermatophytoses are infections of the skin, hair or nails caused by dermatophytes. Dermatophytes can induce typical diagnostic clinical lesions (tinea), but can also mimic other dermatoses. Therefore, physicians need to be familiar with the whole spectrum of tinea and must constantly be mindful of possible dermatophytosis. An examination with Wood’s light can be helpful. In superficial lesions, the demonstration of dermatophytes may be achieved by dermatoscopy or laser scanning. An essential step of the following diagnostic procedure is the skilful collection of samples for the proof of fungi. Microscopy of KOH mounts or equivalent preparations produced from infected material and histology are approved methods. The necessary identification of dermatophytes on species level can finally be accomplished by conventional methods based on cultures or by new techniques based on molecular differentiation or MALDI-TOF analysis. These modern methods are clearly on the increase and can considerably improve and accelerate dermatophyte identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Shemer A, Davidovici B, Grunwald MH, Trau H, Amichai B. Comparative study of nail sampling techniques in onychomycosis. J Dermatol. 2009;36:410–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes R, Chiaverini C, Bahadoran P, Lacour JP. Corkscrew hair: a new dermoscopic sign for diagnosis of tineacapitis in black children. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147:355–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miteva M, Tosti A. Hair and scalp dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:1040–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mapelli ET, Gualandri L, Cerri A, Menni S. Comma hairs in tineacapitis: a useful dermatoscopic sign for diagnosis of tineacapitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;29:223–4. Helpful technique to assess tinea lesions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piraccini BM, Balestri R, Starace M, Rech G. Nail digital dermoscopy (onychoscopy) in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:509–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piliouras P, Allison S, Rosendahl C, Buettner PG, Weedon D. Dermoscopy improves diagnosis of tineanigra: a study of 50 cases. Australas J Dermatol. 2011;52:191–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Markus R, Huzaira M, Anderson RR, González S. A better potassium hydroxide preparation? In vivo diagnosis of tinea with confocal microscopy. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:1076–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liansheng Z, Xin J, Cheng Q, Zhiping W, Yanqun L. Diagnostic applicability of confocal laser scanning microscopy in tinea corporis. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52:1281–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Turan E, Erdemir AT, Gurel MS, Yurt N. A new diagnostic technique for tinea incognito: in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Report of five cases. Skin Res Technol. 2013;19:e103–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hui D, Xue-cheng S, Ai-e X. Evaluation of reflectance confocal microscopy in dermatophytosis. Mycoses. 2013;56:130–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rothmund G, Sattler EC, Kaestle R, Fischer C, Haas CJ, Starz H, et al. Confocal laser scanning microscopy as a new valuable tool in the diagnosis of onychomycosis—comparison of six diagnostic methods. Mycoses. 2013;56:47–55. Interesting results of CSLM in onychomycosis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Côbo EC, Silva JC, Cota UA, Machado JR, Castellano LR. Evaluation of a modified microscopic direct diagnosis of dermatophytosis. J Microbiol Methods. 2010;81:205–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ulrich M, Lange-Asschenfeldt S. In vivo confocal microscopy in dermatology: from research to clinical application. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:061212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haldane DJ, Robart E. A comparison of calcofluor white, potassium hydroxide, and culture for the laboratory diagnosis of superficial fungal infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1990;13:337–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tambosis E, Lim C. A comparison of the contrast stains, Chicago blue, chlorazole black, and Parkerink, for the rapid diagnosis of skin and nail infections. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51:935–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinberg JM, Koestenblatt EK, Tutrone WD, Tishler HR, Najarian L. Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:193–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piérard GE, Quatresooz P, Arrese JE. Spotlight on nail histomycology. Dermatol Clin. 2006;24:371–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Amiri A, Chatrath V, Bhawan J, Stefanato CM. The periodic acid-Schiff stain in diagnosing tinea: should it be used routinely in inflammatory skin diseases? J Cutan Pathol. 2003;30:611–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barak O, Asarch A, Horn T. PAS is optimal for diagnosing onychomycosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37:1038–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Idriss MH, Khalil A, Elston D. The diagnostic value of fungal fluorescence in onychomycosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2013;40:385–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lanternier F, Pathan S, Vincent QB, Liu L, Cypowyj S, Prando C, et al. Deep dermatophytosis and inherited CARD9 deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1704–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kondori N, Abrahamsson AL, Ataollahy N, Wennerås C. Comparison of a new commercial test, Dermatophyte-PCR kit, with conventional methods for rapid detection and identification of Trichophytonrubrum in nail specimens. Med Mycol. 2010;48:1005–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen RH, Arendrup MC. Molecular diagnosis of dermatophyte infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:126–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gräser Y, Czaika V, Ohst T. Diagnostic PCR of dermatophytes—an overview. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10:721–6. A nice review of PCR-based diagnostic methods.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dhib I, Fathallah A, Charfeddine IB, Meksi SG, Said MB, Slama F, et al. Evaluation of Chitine synthase (CHS1) polymerase chain reaction assay in diagnosis of dermatophyteonychomycosis. J Mycol Med. 2012;22:249–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Higashi Y, Miyoshi H, Takeda K, Saruwatari H, Kubo H, Sakaguchi I, et al. Evaluation of a newly-developed immunochromatography strip test for diagnosing dermatophytosis. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51:406–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luk NM, Hui M, Cheng TS, Tang LS, Ho KM. Evaluation of PCR for the diagnosis of dermatophytes in nail specimens from patients with suspected onychomycosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2012;37:230–4. An interesting test for the routine.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Verrier J, Pronina M, Peter C, Bontems O, Fratti M, Salamin K, et al. Identification of infectious agents in onychomycoses by PCR-terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:553–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paugam A, L'Ollivier C, Viguié C, Anaya L, Mary C, de Ponfilly G, et al. Comparison of real-time PCR with conventional methods to detect dermatophytes in samples from patients with suspected dermatophytosis. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;95:218–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kondori N, Tehrani PA, Strömbeck L, Faergemann J. Comparison of dermatophyte PCR kit with conventional methods for detection of dermatophytes in skin specimens. Mycopathologia. 2013;176:237–41. A promising PCR test kit.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pankewitz F, Nenoff P, Uhrlaß S, Bezold G, Winter I, Gräser Y. Development of a novel polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Trichophyton rubrum onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:1236–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miyajima Y, Satoh K, Uchida T, Yamada T, Abe M, Watanabe S, et al. Rapid real-time diagnostic PCR for Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes in patients with tinea unguium and tine apedis using specific fluorescent probes. J Dermatol Sci. 2013;69:229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dhib I, Fathallah A, Yaacoub A, Hadj Slama F, Said MB, Zemni R. Multiplex PCR assay for the detection of common dermatophyte nail infections. Mycoses. 2014;57:19–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mehlig L, Garve C, Ritschel A, Zeiler A, Brabetz W, Weber C, et al. Clinical evaluation of a novel commercial multiplex-based PCR diagnostic test for differential diagnosis of dermatomycoses. Mycoses. 2014;57:27–34. A promising test kit.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsunemi Y, Takehara K, Miura Y, Nakagami G, Sanada H, Kawashima M. Screening for tinea unguium by Dermatophyte Test Strip. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(2):328–31. A test strip with high sensitivity in onychomycosis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Erhard M, Hipler UC, Burmester A, Brakhage AA, Wöstemeyer J. Identification of dermatophyte species causing onychomycosis and tine apedis by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17:356–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Theel ES, Hall L, Mandrekar J, Wengenack NL. Dermatophyte identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:4067–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Packeu A, Hendrickx M, Beguin H, Martiny D, Vandenberg O, Detandt M. Identification of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex species using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Med Mycol. 2013;51:580–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. de Respinis S, Tonolla M, Pranghofer S, Petrini L, Petrini O, Bosshard PP. Identification of dermatophytes by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Med Mycol. 2013;51:514–21. Confirms the effectiveness of MALDI-TOF analysis for identification of dermatophytes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. L'Ollivier C, Cassagne C, Normand AC, Bouchara JP, Contet-Audonneau N, Hendrickx M, et al. A MALDI-TOF MS procedure for clinical dermatophyte species identification in the routine laboratory. Med Mycol. 2013;51:713–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nenoff P, Erhard M, Simon JC, Muylowa GK, Herrmann J, Rataj W, et al. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry—a rapid method for the identification of dermatophyte species. Med Mycol. 2013;51:17–24. Depicts the potential MALDI-TOF analysis.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

J. Brasch declares no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Brasch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brasch, J. Diagnosis of Dermatophytosis. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 8, 198–202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-014-0191-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-014-0191-0

Keywords

Navigation