Abstract
An oriented array of electron transporting nanowires, grown directly on a transparent conductor constitutes an optimal architecture for efficient photovoltaic applications. In addition, semiconductor nanocrystals can work as efficient light absorbers because of their tunable optical properties. In this paper, we use an oriented array of TiO2 nanowires grown directly on a transparent conductive electrode and subsequently sensitized with colloidally grown CdSeS nanocrystal quantum dots (QDs), using an efficient bi-linker assisted methodology, to demonstrate photovoltaic cells. Upon excitation with light, exciton dissociation takes place at the nanowire-nanocrystal interface, after which, electrons are transported to the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) electrode via single-crystalline TiO2 nanowire channels. We demonstrate that an ex situ ligand exchange of QDs followed by sensitization on oxygen-plasma treated TiO2 nanowires results in enhanced loading of QDs, as compared to the in situ ligand exchange approach. An array of 1 μm long TiO2 nanowire sensitized with CdSeS nanocrystals exhibits photovoltaic effects with a short-circuit current of 2–3 mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage of 0.6–0.7 V and a fill factor of 52–65%, resulting in devices with efficiencies of up to 0.6%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnham, K. W. J.; Mazzer, M.; Clive, B. Resolving the energy crisis: Nuclear or photovoltaics? Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 161–164.
Kamat, P. V. Meeting the clean energy demand: Nanostructure architectures for solar energy conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 2834–2860.
Gregg, B. A. Excitonic solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 4688–4698.
O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740.
Chiba, Y.; Islam, A.; Watanabe, Y.; Komiya, R.; Koide, N.; Han, L. Dye-sensitized solar cells with conversion efficiency of 11.1%. Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, L638-L640.
Alivisatos, A. P. Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 1996, 271, 933–937.
Murray, C. B.; Norris, D. J.; Bawendi, M. G. Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E = sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8706–8715.
Qu, L.; Peng, X. Control of photoluminescence properties of CdSe nanocrystals in growth. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2049–2055.
Chan, W. C. W.; Nie, S. Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. Science 1998, 281, 2016–2018.
Schaller, R. D.; Klimov, V. I. High efficiency carrier multiplication in PbSe nanocrystals: Implications for solar energy conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 186601.
Schaller, R. D.; Sykora, M.; Pietryga, J. M.; Klimov, V. I. Seven excitons at a cost of one: Redefining the limits for conversion efficiency of photons into charge carriers. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 424–429.
Ellingson, R. J.; Beard, M. C.; Johnson, J. C.; Yu, P.; Micic, O. I.; Nozik, A. J.; Shaebev, A.; Efros, A. L. Highly efficient multiple exciton generation in colloidal PbSe and PbS quantum dots. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 865–871.
Fang, J.; Wu, J.; Lu, X.; Shen, Y.; Lu, Z. Sensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 electrode with quantum sized CdSe and ZnTCPc molecules. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 270, 145–151.
Robel, I.; Subramanian, V.; Kuno, M.; Kamat, P. V. Quantum dot solar cells. Harvesting light energy with CdSe nanocrystals molecularly linked to mesoscopic TiO2 films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2385–2393.
Zaban, A.; Micic, O. I.; Nozik, A. J. Photosensitization of nanoporous TiO2 electrodes with InP quantum dots. Langmuir 1998, 14, 3153–3156.
Plass, R.; Plete, S.; Krueger, J.; Grätzel, M. Quantum dot sensitization of organic-inorganic hybrid solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7578–7580.
Bang, J. H.; Kamat, P. V. Quantum dot sensitized solar cells. A tale of two semiconductor nanocrystals: CdSe and CdTe. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1467–1476.
Peter, L. M.; Riley, D. J.; Tull, E. J.; Wijayantha, K. G. U. Photosensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 by self-assembled layers of CdS quantum dots. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1030–1031.
Zhu, K.; Neale, N. R.; Miedaner, A.; Frank, A. J. Enhanced charge-collection efficiencies and light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells using oriented TiO2 nanotubes arrays. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 69–74.
Mor, G. K.; Shankar, K.; Paulose, M.; Varghese, O. K.; Grimes, C. A. Use of highly-ordered TiO2 nanotube arrays in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 215–218.
Adachi, M.; Murata, Y.; Okada, I.; Yoshikawa, S. Formation of titania nanotubes and applications for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, G488–G493.
Kongkanand, A.; Tvrdy, K.; Takechi, K.; Kuno, M.; Kamat, P. V. Quantum dot solar cells. Tuning photoresponse through size and shape control of CdSe-TiO2 architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4007–4015.
van de Lagemaat, J.; Park, N. G.; Frank, A. J. Influence of electrical potential distribution, charge transport, and recombination on the photopotential and photocurrent conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cells: A study by electrical impedance and optical modulation techniques. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 2044–2052.
Oekermann, T.; Zhang, D.; Yoshida, T.; Minoura, H. Electron transport and back reaction in nanocrystalline TiO2 films prepared by hydrothermal crystallization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 2227–2235.
Lu, S.; Madhukar, A. Nonradiative resonant excitation transfer from nanocrystal quantum dots to adjacent quantum channels. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 3443–3451.
Greene, L. E.; Law, M.; Goldberger, J.; Kim, F.; Johnson, J. C.; Zhang, Y.; Saykally, R. J.; Yang, P. Low-temperature wafer-scale production of ZnO nanowire arrays. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3031–3034.
Law, M.; Greene, L. E.; Johnson, J. C.; Saykally, R.; Yang, P. Nanowire dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 455–459.
Leschkies, K. S.; Divakar, R.; Basu, J.; Enache-Pommer, E.; Boercker, J. E.; Cartar, C. B.; Kortshagen, U. R.; Norris, D. J.; Aydil, E. S. Photosensitization of ZnO nanowires with CdSe quantum dots for photovoltaic devices. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1793–1798.
Keis, K.; Lindgren J.; Lindquist, S. E.; Hagfeldt, A. Studies of the adsorption process of Ru complexes in nanoporous ZnO electrodes. Langmuir 2000, 16, 4688–4694.
Kumar, A.; Madaria, A. R.; Zhou, C. Growth of aligned single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanowires on arbitrary substrates and their application in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 7787–7792.
Liu, B.; Aydil, E. S. Growth of oriented single-crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorods on transparent conducting substrates for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3985–3990.
Feng, X.; Shankar, K.; Varghese, O. K.; Paulose, M.; Latempa, T. J.; Grimes, C. A. Vertically aligned single crystal TiO2 nanowire arrays grown directly on transparent conducting oxide coated glass: Synthesis details and applications. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3781–3786.
Robel, I.; Kuno, M.; Kamat, P. V. Size-dependent electron injection from excited CdSe quantum dots into TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4136–4137.
Koops, S. E.; O’Regan, B. C.; Barnes, P. R. F.; Durrant, J. R. Parameters influencing the efficiency of electron injection in dye-sensitized solar sells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4808–4818.
Haque, S. A.; Polomares, E.; Cho, B. M.; Green, A. N. M.; Hirata, N.; Klug, D. R.; Durrant, J. R. Charge separation versus recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells: The minimization of kinetic redundancy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3456–3462.
Gimenez, S.; Maro-Sero, I.; Macor, L.; Guijarro, N.; Lana-Vilarreal, T.; Gomez, R.; Diguna, L. J.; Shen, Q.; Toyoda, T.; Bisquert, J. Improving the performance of colloidal quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 295204.
Jang, E.; Jun, S.; Pu, L. High quality CdSeS nanocrystals synthesized by facile single injection process and their electroluminescence. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2964–2965.
Sarma, D. D.; Nag, A.; Santra, P. K.; Kumar, A.; Sapra, S.; Mahadevan, P. Origin of the enhanced photoluminescence from semiconductor CdSeS nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2149–2153.
Aldana, J.; Wang, Y. A.; Peng, X. Photochemical instability of CdSe nanocrystals coated by hydrophilic thiols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8844–8850.
Niitsoo, O.; Sarkar, S. K.; Pejoux, C.; Rühle, S.; Cahen, D.; Hodes, G. Chemical bath deposited CdS/CdSe-sensitized porous TiO2 solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2006, 181, 306–311.
Nicolau, Y. F.; Dupuy, M.; Brunel, M. ZnS, CdS, and Zn1−x CdxS thin-film deposited by the successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 2915–2924.
Kalyuzhny, G.; Murray, R. W. Ligand effects on optical properties of CdSe nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 7012–7021.
Aldana, J.; Lavelle, N.; Wang, Y.; Peng, X. Size-dependent dissociation pH of thiolate ligands from cadmium chalcogenide nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2496–2504.
Sambur, J. B.; Parkinson, B. A. CdSe/ZnS core/shell quantum dot sensitization of low index TiO2 single crystal surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2130–2131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Li, Kt., Madaria, A.R. et al. Sensitization of hydrothermally grown single crystalline TiO2 nanowire array with CdSeS nanocrystals for photovoltaic applications. Nano Res. 4, 1181–1190 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-011-0168-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-011-0168-z