Skip to main content
Log in

Computational fluid dynamics studies on the effectiveness of sidewall sprinklers to suppress the fire at the undercarriage of mass rapid transit train

  • Research Article
  • Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of sidewall automatic fire sprinklers installed adjacent to and in close proximity to the trains to suppress the fire at the undercarriage of the trains in the stabling yard, for the sake of protection of the train assets. Plume cooling due to water spray from fast response sprinklers is simulated with the sprinkler model available in Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). Concurrently, fire suppression due to the interaction between the water and fire source is simply modelled with the assumption of an exponential reduction of the prescribed burning/pyrolysis rate. The objective is to gain some insight about the effectiveness of sidewall sprinklers proposed to prevent the fire from spreading to adjacent trains. CFD simulation results demonstrate that it is highly likely that the undercarriage fire will spread to both the connected train-car and its adjacent train, if only overhead sprinklers are provided in the design. Due to the obstruction posed by the train, water cannot reach the fire source. Sidewall sprinklers are very effective to detect, control, suppress and even extinguish the fire, hence preventing the spread of fire. When sidewall sprinklers are installed on both sides of the trains, further asset protection may be extended successfully to the connected train cars. This study implies that the installation of sidewall sprinklers may be a practical solution for the protection of train assets in the stabling yard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreini A, Soghe RD, Giusti A, Caruso L (2011). Pyrolysis modeling and numerical simulation of rail carriage fire scenarios for the safe design of a passenger train. Paper presented at the 7th Mediterranean Combustion Symposium, Chia Laguna, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyler CL (2002). Flammability limits of premixed and diffusion flame. In: Di Nenno PJ (ed), SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. Quincy, MA, USA: National Fire Protection Association. pp. 2.172–2.187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiam BH (2005). Numerical simulation of a metro train fire. Master Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamins A, McGrattan K (2003). Reduced-scale experiments on the water suppression of a rack-storage commodity fire for calibration of a CFD fire model. Fire Safety Science, 7: 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Wu L, Lu K, Zhang X, Liu S, Qiu Z (2014). Optimization of emergency ventilation mode for a train on fire stopping beside platform of a metro station. Building Simulation, 7: 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenft A, Boulet P, Collin A, Pianet G, Breton A, Muller A (2013). Can we predict fire extinction by water mist with FDS? Mechanics & Industry, 14: 389–393.

  • Liu Z, Kim AK (2000). A review of water mist fire suppression systems—Fundamental studies. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 10(3): 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan K, Hostikka S, McDermott R, Floyd J, Weinschenk C, Overholt K (2013a). Fire Dynamics Simulator User’s Guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1019. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan K, Hostikka S, McDermott R, Floyd J, Weinschenk C, Overholt K (2013b). Fire Dynamics Simulator Technical Reference Guide, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1018. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo TD, Nguyen QT, Tran P (2016). Heat release and flame propagation in prefabricated modular unit with GFRP composite facades. Building Simulation, 9: 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard DT (2002). Spray characteristics of fire sprinklers. PhD Thesis, Northwestern University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodosiu CI, Ilie V, Dumitru RG, Teodosiu RS (2016). Assessment of ventilation efficiency for emergency situations in subway systems by CFD modeling. Building Simulation, 9: 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaari J, Hostikka S, SikanenT, Paajanen A (2012). Numerical Simulations on the Performance of Waterbased Fire Suppressions Systems. VTT Technology 54. Helsinki, Finland: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MGM, Loomans MGLC, Lemaire AD, Hensen JLM (2013). Fire safety assessment of semi-open car parks based on validated CFD simulations. Building Simulation, 6: 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengwei Ge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, Z., Xu, G., Chua, K.H. et al. Computational fluid dynamics studies on the effectiveness of sidewall sprinklers to suppress the fire at the undercarriage of mass rapid transit train. Build. Simul. 10, 563–571 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0344-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0344-x

Keywords

Navigation