Abstract
An ethically conducted randomised controlled trial (RCT) is the backbone of evidence based medicine. In surgical practice however, RCTs have taken a backseat, drawing much adverse comment. There are several reasons to explain surgeons’ disinclination to conduct RCTs. These include many practical difficulties such as the problem of blinding surgical procedures, design and funding issues. There are also many ethical issues which need to be considered including the concept of equipoise as well as the ethical issues associated with sham surgery as a control. While there is no doubt that RCTs are essential and in fact have helped to weed out several unnecessary surgical procedures, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that they may not be always necessary in order to obtain evidence in favour of a procedure. Possible solutions could be to follow guidelines that have been issued by learned bodies and a strict adherence to all ethical norms that have been recommended in the conduct of trials
Similar content being viewed by others
References
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/NurembergDoctorTrial.html (accessed 22october, 2010)
Beecher HK (1966) Ethics and clinical research. New Eng J Med 274:1354–1360
Rickham PP (1964) Human experimentation. code of ethics of the world medical association, declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 2(5402):177
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (2007) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:3–5
Horton R (1996) Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers. Lancet 347(9007):984–985
The EC/IC Bypass Study Group (1985) Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. N Engl J Med 313:1191–1200
Cobb LA, Thomas GI, Dillard DH, Merndino KA, Bruce RA (1959) An evaluation of internal mammary-artery ligation by a double-blind technic. N Engl J Med 260:1115–1118
Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH et al (2002) A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 347:81–88
Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer. A prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 226:169–173
Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholls P, Smythe A, Reed MW, Stoddard CJ, Peacock J, Johnson AG (1996) Randomized prospective single blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 347:989–994
Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1997) Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery. BrJ Surg 84:610–614
Johnson AJ, Dixon JM (1997) Removing bias in surgical trials. BMJ 314(7085):916–917
McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sasako M, Lovett B, Griffin D (2002) Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ 324:1448–1451
Goligher JC, Pulvertaft CN, De Bombal FT, Conyers JH, Duthie HL, Feather DB et al (1968) Five to eight year results of Leeds/York controlled trial of elective surgery for duodenal ulcer. BMJ 2:781–787
Goligher JC, Feather DB, Hall R, Hal RA, Hopton D, Kenny TE et al (1979) Several standard elective operations for duodenal ulcer: ten to sixteen year clinical results. Ann Surg 189:18–24
Djulbegovic B (2009) The paradox of equipoise: the principle that drives and limits therapeutic discoveries in clinical research. Cancer Control 16(4):342–347
Freedman B (2006) Equipose and the ethics of clinical research. In: Kuhse H, Singer P (eds) Bioethics: an anthology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishers, Malden
Gelijns AC, Ascheim DD, Parides MK, Kent KC, Moskowitz AJ (2009) Randomized trials in surgery. Surgery 145(6):581–587
Rettig RA, Jacobsen PD, Farquhar CM, Aubry WM (2007) False hope: bone marrowtransplantation for breast cancer. Oxford University Press, New York
Mc Culloch P (1999) Evidence based surgery: do we need it, and can we get it? http://ktclearinghouse.ca/cebm/syllabi/gensurgery/intro (accessed 22/10/10)
Polgar S (2006) Evidence based methodology for advancing neural reconstruction. In: Sanberg CD, Sanberg PR (eds) Cell therapy, stem cells and brain repair. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 325–339
Miller FG (2003) Sham surgery: an ethical analysis. Sci Eng Ethics 10(1):157–166
Polgar S, Ng J (2005) Ethics, methodology and the use of placebo controls in surgical trials. Brain Res Bull 67:290–297
Emmanuel EJ, Miller FG (2001) The ethics of placebo-controlled trials—a middle ground. New Engl J Med 345:915–919
Wolf BR, Buckwalter JA (2006) Randomised surgical trials and sham surgery: relevance to modern orthopedic and minimally invasive surgery. Iowa Orthop J 26:107–111
Tenery R, Rakatansky H, Riddick Frank A, Goldrich M, Morse LJ, O’Bannon JM et al (2002) Surgical placebo controls. Ann Surg 235(2):303–307
Menasche P (2010) Cardiac cell therapy: Lessons from clinical trials: J Mol Cell Cardiol [Epub ahead of print]
Gejlins AC, Aschleim DD, Parides MK, Kent KG, Moskowitz AJ (2009) Randomised trials in Surgery. Surgery 145(6):581–587
Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Ståhle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, Van Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, Investigators SYNTAX (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360:961–972
Parides MK, Moskowitz AJ, Ascheim DD, Rose EA, Gelijns AC (2006) Progress versusprecision: challenges in clinical trial design for left ventricular assist devices. Ann Thorac Surg 82:1140–1146
Park SJ, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Frazier OH, Piccioni W, Raines E et al (2005) LVADs as destination therapy: a new look at survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:9–17
Thompson DF (1993) Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med 329:573–576
McDonald PJ, Kulkarni AV, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M (2010) Ethical issues in surgical research. Can J Surg 53:133–136
Van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA, Putterill MJ, Reddy CK, Wright JJ (1995) CUSUM as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg 82:1500–1503
Poloniecki J, Valencia O, Littlejohns P (1998) Cumulative risk adjusted mortality chart for detecting changes in death rate: observational study of heart surgery. BMJ 316:1697–1700
Lovegrove J, Valencia O, Treasure T, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Gallivan S (1997) Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable lifeadjusted display. Lancet 350:1128–1130
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T. CONSORT GROUP (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 134(8):663–694
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, A.K. Randomised Clinical Trials in Surgery: A Look at the Ethical and Practical Issues. Indian J Surg 73, 245–250 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-011-0307-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-011-0307-5