Skip to main content
Log in

Virtual coordinate system using dominating set for GPS-free adhoc networks

  • Published:
Annals of Telecommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reported work on virtual coordinate assignment (VCA) schemes are iterative-based techniques which rely upon geometric projection (i.e., projecting on circle) or embedding of network topology to low-dimensional Euclidean space (like graph embedding, multidimensional scaling). The performance of existing VCA techniques is constrained by topological situations such as low density or having voids/holes, where greedy forwarding suffers due to local minima when no neighbor is found closer to the destination or low-quality routes comprised of long distance hops. Another drawback of existing VCA techniques is the requirement of thousand iterations for usable coordinate convergence. In order to overcome these drawbacks, we propose a novel virtual coordinate construction technique using graph-theoretic dominating sets. Dominating set (DS) of G is a subset of vertices such that each vertex in G is either in DS or has a neighbor in DS. We found that our virtual coordinate assignment using dominating set algorithm has an approximation ratio \(((4.8+\ln 5)opt +1.2)\), where opt is the minimum size dominating set which has the same approximation ratio as minimum dominating set problem. Our algorithm has time complexity \(\mathcal {O}(n)\) times and \(\mathcal {O}(D)\) rounds and message complexity is \(\mathcal {O}(n\log n)\), where D is the radius and n is the number of nodes in networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karp B, Kung H-T (2000) GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM

  2. Abreu DP et al (2016) A resilient Internet of Things architecture for smart cities. Annals of Telecommunications: 1–12

  3. Rao A et al (2003) Geographic routing without location information. Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. ACM

  4. Newsome J, Song D (2003) GEM: Graph EMbedding for routing and data-centric storage in sensor networks without geographic information. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. ACM

  5. Leong B, Liskov B, Morris R, Liskov B, Morris R (2007) Greedy virtual coordinates for geographic routing

  6. Ke L, Abu-Ghazaleh N (2008) Aligned virtual coordinates for greedy geometric routing in WSNs. Int J Sensor Netw 3(4):252–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan G, Bertier M, Kermarrec A-M (2009) Convex partition of sensor networks and its use in virtual coordinate geographic routing. INFOCOM 2009, IEEE. IEEE

  8. Awad A, German R, Dressler F (2011) Exploiting virtual coordinates for improved routing performance in sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 10(9):1214–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin C-H et al (2008) Virtual-coordinate-based delivery-guaranteed routing protocol in wireless sensor networks with unidirectional links. INFOCOM 2008. The 27th Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE. IEEE

  10. Huang P, Wang C, Li X (2012) Improving end-to-end routing performance of greedy forwarding in sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 23(3):556–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mirsadeghi M, Mahani A (2015) Energy efficient fast predictor for WSN-based target tracking. Ann Telecommun 70(1-2):63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouet M, Pujolle G (2010) RFID in eHealth systems: applications, challenges, and perspectives. Ann Telecommun 65(9-10):497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nieberg T (2006) Independent and dominating sets in wireless communication graphs

  14. Leong B Geographic routing network simulator, 2004. http://web.mit.edu/benleong/www/netsim

  15. Breu H, Kirkpatrick DG (1998) Unit disk graph recognition is NP-hard. Comput Geom 9(1):3–24

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu W, Du H, Jia X, Li Y, Huang SCH (2006) Minimum connected dominating sets and maximal independent sets in unit disk graphs. Theor Comput Sci 352(1):1–7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Thai MT, Wang F, Yi CW, Wan PJ, Du DZ (2005) On greedy construction of connected dominating sets in wireless networks. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 5(8):927–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Misra R., Mandal C (2010) Minimum connected dominating set using a collaborative cover heuristic for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 21(3):292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bettstetter C (2002) On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile ad Hoc Networking & Computing, pp 80–91. ACM

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shailendra Shukla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, S., Misra, R. & Agarwal, A. Virtual coordinate system using dominating set for GPS-free adhoc networks. Ann. Telecommun. 72, 199–208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-017-0563-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-017-0563-x

Keywords

Navigation