Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Home Garden Agrobiodiversity Differentiates Along a Rural—Peri–Urban Gradient in Campeche, México

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Home Garden Agrobiodiversity Differentiates Along a Rural—Peri–Urban Gradient in Campeche, México

Home Garden Agrobiodiversity Differentiates Along a Rural—Peri–Urban Gradient in Campeche, México. Agrobiodiversity in tropical home gardens is thought to decline with increasing urbanization, but information in this regard is scarce. We characterized livelihoods and compared attributes of home gardens of rural, semi–rural, and peri–urban families in Campeche, México. We hypothesized a decline of agrobiodiversity of cultivated trees and shrubs, its native component, and the diversity of uses from rural to peri–urban livelihoods, and increases for cultivated herbs. We registered all cultivated species in 12 randomly selected home gardens in each condition, and determined species’ origin and use. Total and average observed species richness of trees and shrubs in rural and semi–rural home gardens was similar and higher than in peri–urban home gardens, but equally sized samples all had similar richness. Tree density and basal area were largest in semi–rural home gardens. Total observed and average species richness of herbs increased along the rural—peri–urban gradient, and richness of equally sized samples of herbs was higher in peri–urban than in rural and semi–rural home gardens. Peri–urban home gardens had the highest richness of equally sized samples of all plants. Differences in richness were associated with a shift in livelihoods, influencing plant uses, and hence species composition along the gradient: peri–urban families combined some fruit trees with a large diversity of ornamental herbs. Rural and semi–rural families maintained tree and shrub species of distinct uses, cultivated less ornamental species and a larger native component than peri–urban home gardens. We conclude that agrobiodiversity does not decline along the rural—peri–urban gradient, but differentiates.

La agrobiodiversidad en huertos familiares diferencía a lo largo de un gradiente rural—peri–urbano en Campeche, México

La agrobiodiversidad en huertos familiares diferencía a lo largo de un gradiente rural—peri–urbano en Campeche, México. Se piensa que la agrobiodiversidad en huertos familiares tropicales disminuye conforme avanza la urbanización, sin embargo, la información al respecto es escasa. Caracterizamos los medios de vida y comparamos atributos de huertos familiares de familias rurales, semi–rurales y peri–urbanos en Campeche, México, hipotetizando una reducción de la agrobiodiversidad de árboles y arbustos cultivados, de su componente nativo, y de la diversidad de usos de medios de vida rurales hacia peri–urbanas, e incrementos con respecto a herbáceas cultivadas. Se registraron todas las especies cultivadas en 12 huertos seleccionados al azar en cada condición, y se determinó el origen y uso de las especies. La riqueza total observada y media de árboles y arbustos en huertos rurales y semi–rurales era similar y mayor que en huertos peri–urbanos, sin embargo, en muestras de igual tamaño de las tres condiciones la riqueza fue similar. La densidad arbórea fue mayor en los huertos semi–rurales. La riqueza total y media de especies herbáceas fue mayor en huertos peri–urbanos que en los rurales y semi–rurales. Huertos peri–urbanos tenían la mayor riqueza de muestras de igual tamaño de todas las plantas. Diferencias en riqueza estaban asociadas con variaciones en los medios de vida, al influir sobre los usos de las plantas, y con ello sobre la composición de especies a lo largo del gradiente: familias peri–urbanas combinaban algunos árboles frutales con una gran diversidad de herbáceas ornamentales. Familias rurales y semi–rurales mantenían especies arbóreas y arbustivas de distintos usos, cultivaban menos especies ornamentales, y un componente nativo más grande que huertos peri–urbanos. Concluimos que la agrobiodiversidad no disminuye a lo largo del gradiente rural—peri–urbano, sino que diferencía.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abdoellah, O., B. Parekesit, and H. Hadikusumah. 2002. Home gardens in the Upper Citarum Watershed, West Java: A challenge for in situ conservation of plant genetic resources. In: Home gardens and in situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems: Proceedings of the second International Home Gardens workshop, 17–19 July 2001, Witzenhausen, Federal Republic of Germany, eds., J. W. Watson and P. B. Eyzaguirre, 140–160. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.

  • Abebe, T., F. J. Sterck, K. F. Wiersum, and F. Bongers. 2013. Diversity, composition and density of trees and shrubs in agroforestry home gardens in Southern Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems. doi:10.1007/s10457-013-9637-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinnifesi, F. K., G. W. Sileshi, O. C. Ajayi, A. I. Akinnifesi, E. G. Moura, J. F. P. Linhares, and I. Rodrigues. 2010. Biodiversity of the urban home gardens of São Luís City, Northeastern Brazil. Urban Ecosystems 13:129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arifin, H. S., K. Sakamoto, and K. Chiba. 1998. Effects of urbanisation on the vegetation structure of home gardens in West Java, Indonesia. Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture 42:94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azurdia, C., J. M. Leiva, and E. López. 2000. Contribución de los huertos familiares para la conservación in situ de recursos genéticos vegetales II. Caso de la región de Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. TIKALIA (Guatemala) 18:35–78.

  • Barrera, A. 1980. Sobre la unidad de habitación tradicional campesina y el manejo de recursos bióticos en el área Maya Yucatanense. Biotica 5:115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholt, H., K. Kehlenbeck, J. Gebauer, and A. Buerkert. 2009. Plant species richness and diversity in urban and peri–urban gardens of Niamey, Niger. Agroforestry Systems 77:159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert, I., R. L. Swennen, M. Paredes–Flores, R. Rosas–López, and R. Lira–Saade. 2004. Floristic composition, plant uses and management practices in home gardens of San Rafael Coxcotlaán, Valle of Tehuacán–Cuicatlán, México. Journal of Arid Environments 57:179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, J. 1992. Maya homegardens: Past, present and future. Etnoecológica 1:35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekara, U. M. and E. C. Baiju. 2010. Changing pattern of species composition and species utilization in home gardens of Kerala, India. Tropical Ecology 51:221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • CICY, 2010. Flora de la Península de Yucatán. http://www.cicy.mx/sitios/flora%20digital/ (15 June 2013).

  • Cilliers, S., J. Cilliers, R. Lubbe, and S. Siebert. 2012. Ecosystem services of urban green spaces in African countries: Perspectives and challenges. Urban Ecosystems 1–22, doi:10.1007/s11252–012–0254–3.

  • Das, T. and A. K. Das. 2005. Inventorying plant biodiversity in home gardens: A case study in Barak Valley, Assam, North East India. Current Science (Bangalore) 89:155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durán, R., J. C. Trejo–Torres, and G. Ibarra–Manríquez. 1998. Endemic phytotaxa of the Peninsula of Yucatán. Harvard Papers in Botany 3(2):263–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyzaguirre, P. and J. Watson. 2002. Home gardens and agrobiodiversity: An overview across regions. In: Home gardens and in situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems: Proceedings of the second International Home Gardens workshop, 17–19 July 2001, Witzenhausen, Federal Republic of Germany, eds., J. W. Watson and P. B. Eyzaguirre, 10–14. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.

  • Galluzzi, G., P. Eyzaguirre, and V. Negri. 2010. Home gardens: Neglected hotspots of agro–biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9919-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • García de Miguel, J. 2000. Etnobotánica maya: Origen y evolución de los huertos familiares de la Península de Yucatán, México. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto de Sociología y Estudios Campesinos, Universidad de Cordoba, Cordoba, España.

  • Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera–Castro, N. 1994. Los huertos familiares mayas en el oriente de Yucatán. In: Etnoflora Yucatanense, ed., J. S. Flores, 169. Mérida, Yucatán, México: Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán.

  • Huai, H. and A. Hamilton. 2009. Characteristics and functions of traditional home gardens: A review. Frontiers of Biology in China 4:151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra–Manríquez, G. 1996. Biogeografía de los árboles nativos de la Península de Yucatán: Un enfoque para evaluar su grado de conservación. Ph.D. thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, México D.F., México.

  • Infante G. S. and L. G. Zárate. 1997. Métodos estadísticos, un enfoque interdisciplinario, ed., Trillas, 643. México: Cuarta reimpresión.

  • Kehlenbeck, K., H. Arifin, and B. Maass. 2007. Plant diversity in homegardens in a socio–economic and agro–ecological context. In: Stability of tropical rainforest margins. Linking ecological, economic and social constraints of land use and conservation, ed., Teja Tscharntke, 297–319. Berlin: Springer.

  • Kumar, B. M. and P. K. R. Nair. 2004. The enigma of tropical home gardens. Agroforestry System 61:135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, G. and F. Mary. 1994. Conversion of traditional village gardens and new economic strategies of rural households in the area of Bogor, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems 25:31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molebatsi, L. Y., S. J. Siebert, S. S. Cilliers, C. S. Lubbe, and E. Davoren. 2010. The Tswana tshimo: A home garden system of useful plants with a particular layout and function. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5:2952–2963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno–Black, G., P. Somnasang, and S. Thamathawan. 1996. Cultivating continuity and creating change: Women’s home garden practices in northeastern Thailand. Agriculture and Human Values 13:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemudzudzanyi, A. O., S. J. Siebert, A. M. Zobolo, and L. Y. Molebatsi. 2010. The Zulu muzi: A home garden system of useful plants with a specific layout and function. African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems 9:57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niinemets, Ü. and J. Peñuelas. 2008. Gardening and urban landscaping: Significant players in global change. Trends in Plant Science 13(2):60–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Y. and L. Xuehua. 2007. Research progress in effects of urbanization on plant biodiversity. Biodiversity Science 15:558–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poot–Pool, W. S., H. Van der Wal, J. S. Flores–Guido, J. M. Pat–Fernandez, and L. Esparza–Olguín. 2012. Economic stratification differentiates home gardens in the Maya village of Pomuch, México. Economic Botany 66:264–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico–Gray, V., J. G. Garcia–Franco, A. Chemas, A. Puch, and P. Sima. 1990. Species composition, similarity, and structure of Mayan home gardens in Tixpeual and Tixcacaltuyub, Yucatán, México. Economic Botany 44:470–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Botanic Gardens. http://www.kew.org/scienceconservation/plants-fungi (19 June 2013).

  • Thompson, K., K. C. Austin, R. M. Smith, P. H. Warren, P. G. Angold, and K. J. Gaston. 2003. Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small–scale plant diversity in context. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal, H. and F. Bongers. 2012. Biosocial and bionumerical diversity of variously sized home gardens in Tabasco, México. Agroforestry Systems 87:93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vila–Ruiz, C. P., E. Meléndez–Ackerman, R. Santiago–Bartolomei, D. García–Montiel, L. Lastra, C. Figuerola, and J. Fumero–Caban. 2014. Plant species richness and abundance in residential yards across a tropical watershed: Implications for urban sustainability. Ecology and Society 19(3):22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. W. and P. B. Eyzaguirre, eds. 2002. Home gardens and in situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems: Proceedings of the second International Home Gardens workshop, 17–19 July 2001, Witzenhausen, Federal Republic of Germany, p. 184. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A. and J. Ohl. 2005. Does remoteness from urban centres influence plant diversity in home gardens and swidden fields: A case study from the Matsiguenka in the Amazonian rain forest of Peru. Agroforestry Systems 65:241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xuluc–Tolosa, F. 1995. Caracterización del componente vegetal de los solares de la comunidad de Sahcabá, Yucatán, México. Tesis de licenciatura. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, UADY.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans van der Wal.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix 1

(DOCX 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poot–Pool, W.S., van der Wal, H., Flores–Guido, S. et al. Home Garden Agrobiodiversity Differentiates Along a Rural—Peri–Urban Gradient in Campeche, México. Econ Bot 69, 203–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9313-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-015-9313-z

Key Words

Navigation