Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenies are relevant when assessing environmental filtering

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

De Bello et al. contemplate the usefulness of phylogenetic corrections in ecological studies involving species traits. They conclude that it is necessary to consider phylogeny when focusing on the evolution of a trait as an adaptation to the environment, but unnecessary when assessing how the composition of traits across a community of species changes along an environmental gradient or under short-term environmental change. Although I agree with their points, the ultimate aim is often to make predictions for new conditions. I therefore suggest putting more effort into exploring the mechanisms behind variation in trait values along environmental gradients. Understanding which functional traits evolved as adaptations is thus a necessary baseline for predicting changes in species functional composition and ecosystem processes in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly DD (1999) Comparative plant ecology and the role of phylogenetic information. Physiol Pl Ecol:391–413

  • Ackerly DD, Donoghue MJ (1998) Leaf size, sapling allometry, and corner’s rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Amer Naturalist 152:767–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly DD, Reich PB (1999) Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Amer J Bot 86:1272–1281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly DD, Dudley SA, Sultan SE, Schmitt J, Coleman JS, Linder CR, Sandquist DR, Geber MA, Evans AS, Dawson TE, Lechowicz MJ (2000) The evolution of plant ecophysiological traits: recent advances and future directions: new research addresses natural selection, genetic constraints, and the adaptive evolution of plant ecophysiological traits. BioScience 50:979–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler PB, Salguero-Gómez R, Compagnoni A, Hsu JS, Ray-Mukherjee J, Mbeau-Ache C, Franco M (2013) Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA:201315179.

  • Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bokma F (2015) Evolution as a largely autonomous process. In Serrelli E, Gontier N (eds) Macroevolution. Springer International Publishing, pp 87–112

  • Cavender-Bares J, Wilczek A (2003) Integrating micro- and macroevolutionary processes in community ecology. Ecology 84:592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares J, Ackerly DD, Baum DA, Bazzaz FA (2004) Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. Amer Naturalist 163:823–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares J, Keen JA, Miles B (2006) Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87:S109–S122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PV, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Letters 12:693–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis SL, Swenson NG, Zanne AE (2009) Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Letters 12:351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In Diamond J, Cody M (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harward University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 342-444

  • Díaz S, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Falczuk V, Casanoves F, Milchunas DG, Skarpe C, Rusch G, Sternberg M, Noy-Meir I, Landsberg J, Zhang W, Clark H, Campbell BD (2007) Plant trait responses to grazing – a global synthesis. Global Change Biol 13:313–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etterson JR, Shaw RG (2001) Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294:151–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy O, Rueda M, Hawkins B (2015) Functional determinants of forest recruitment over broad scales. Global Ecol Biogeogr 24:192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1992) A pragmatic approach to functional ecology. Funct Ecol 6:621–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimešová J, Latzel V, de Bello F, van Groenendael JM (2008) Plant functional traits in studies of vegetation changes in response to grazing and mowing: towards a use of more specific traits. Preslia 80:245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft NJB, Adler PB, Godoy O, James EC, Fuller S, Levine JM (2015) Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct Ecol 29:592–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losos JB (2008) Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol Letters 11:995–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1984) Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. Amer Naturalist 124:863–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 55:259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson TB, Givnish TJ (2002) Phylogeny, concerted convergence, and phylogenetic niche conservatism in the core Liliales: insights from rbcL and ndhF sequence data. Evolution 56:233–252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Olden JD, Vieira NK, Finn DS, Simmons MP, Kondratieff BC (2006) Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: traits-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. J N Amer Benthol Soc 25:730–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB (2014) The world-wide “fast–slow” plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J Ecol 102:275–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares J, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int J Pl Sci 164:S143–S164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Keddy PA (1995) Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion: new questions from old patterns. Oikos 74:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Keddy P (2001) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiher E, Clarke GP, Keddy PA (1998) Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. Oikos 81:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas M-L, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Petr Keil, the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. I also acknowledge grant No. 14-36098G awarded by the Czech Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irena Šímová.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šímová, I. Phylogenies are relevant when assessing environmental filtering. Folia Geobot 51, 65–68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-016-9243-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-016-9243-2

Keywords

Navigation