Abstract
Comparative aspects of the demography were investigated in three distinct populations of the ecologically poorly studied rodent Eliomys quercinus, in Spain and Italy. Maximum longevity was observed in a Spanish female (survival of at least 2 years and 4 months). For all the populations under study, various closed population models and the robust design model gave similarly reliable estimates for population size, with Jolly–Seber estimates being considerably less reliable. The same result also emerged for the estimates of survival and capture probabilities, but with less profound differences between Jolly–Seber and the closed models with robust design. Average density showed considerable oscillations over the years and across localities, being nearly identical in northern and central Italy but considerably higher in Spain. Survival was considerably higher in Spain than in northern and central Italy. Conversely, capture probability was higher in northern Italy than in the other two study areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281
Amori G (1993) Italian insectivores and rodents: extinctions and current status. Suppl Ric Biol Selvag 21:115–134
Amori G, Cantini M, Rota V (1994) Distribution and conservation of Italian dormice. Hystrix Ital J Mammal 6:331–336
Amori G, Castigliani V, Locaciulli O, Luiselli L (2015) Long-term density fluctuations and microhabitat use of sympatric Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus in central Italy. Commun Ecol 16:196–205
Andera M (1994) The present status of dormice in the Czech Republic. Hystrix Ital J. Mammal. 6:155–159
Arnold W (1990) The evolution of marmot sociality II. Costs and benefits of joint hibernation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:239–246
Baudoin C (1980) Organisation sociale et communications intraspecifiques d’un hibernant. BSc thesis, University of Franche-Comte
Baudoin C, Abdi H (1981) Une typologie des ages chez le lerot Eliomys quercinus (L.), au moyen de l’analyse factorielle des correspondances. Rev Ecol (Terre et Vie) 35:173–181
Baudoin C, Mann C, Taillard C (1986) Comparaison de la structure sociale et de l’organization spatiale du lerot dans les Alpes et dans le Jura. Coll Nat CNRS Biol Popul 1986:593–599
Bertolino S, Viano C, Currado I (2001) Population dynamics, breeding patterns and spatial use of the garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus) in an Alpine habitat. J Zool Lond 253:513–521
Bertolino S, Cordero di Montezemolo N, Currado I (2003) Home ranges and habitat use of the garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus) in a mountain habitat in summer. Acta Zool Academ Sci Hung 49(suppl. 1):9–16
Blumstein DT, Arnold W (1998) Ecology and social behavior of golden marmot (Marmota caudata aurea). J Mammal 79:873–886
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Camacho J, Moreno S (1989) Datos sobre la distribución espacial de micromamíferos en el Parque Nacional de Doñana. Doñana Acta Vertebrata 16:239–245
Canova L, Filippini S, Gaudenzi G, Fasola M (2003) Uso di stimatori per la valutazione dell’abbondanza di popolazioni campionate con metodi CMR. Hystrix, The Italian Journal of Mammalogy, IV Congr. It. Teriologia
Chao A (1988) Estimating animal abundance with capture frequency data. J Wildl Manag 52:295–300
Chao A, Lee S-M, Jeng S-L (1992) Estimating population size for capture–recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal. Biometrics 48:201–216
Fauvel T, Brischoux F, Briand MJ, Bonnet X (2012) Do researchers impact their study populations? Assessing the effect of field procedures in a long term population monitoring of sea kraits. Amphib Reptil 33:365–372
Flowerdew JR (1976) Ecological methods. Mammal Rev 6:123–159
Gauthier-Clerc M, Gendner JP, Ribic CA, Fraser WR, Woehler EJ, Descamps S, Gilly C, Le Bohec C, Le Maho Y (2004) Long-term effects of flipper bands on penguins. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 271:S423–S426
JusÏkaitis R (1994) Distribution, abundance and conservation status of dormice (Myoxidae) in Lithuania. Hystrix Ital J Mammal 6:181–184
Kahmann H, Staudenmayer T (1970) Über das Fortplanzungsgeschehen bei dem Gartenschläfer Eliomys quercinus (Linnaeus, 1766). Säugetierkdl Mitt 18:97–114
Korslund L, Steen H (2006) Small rodent winter survival: snow conditions limit access to food resources. J Anim Ecol 75:156–166
Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological Methodology, 2nd edn. Harper and Row Publishers, New York
Langkilde T, Shine R (2006) How much stress do researchers inflict on their study animals? A case study using a scincid lizard, Eulamprus heatwolei. J Exp Biol 209:1035–1043
Locasciulli O, Milana G, Rocchi F, Luiselli L, Amori G (2015) A Cost-efficient novel live-trap for demographic studies of small mammals. Peer J. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.1179v1
Moreno S (1984) Biología, ecología y dinámica poblacional del lirón careto grande (Eliomys quercinus lusitanicus) en el parque Nacional de Doñana (SO de España). PhD thesis. Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
Moreno S (1988) Reproduction of garden dormice (Eliomys quercinus lusitanicus) in southern Spain. Mammalia 52:401–407
Moreno S (2002) Eliomys quercinus (Linnaeus, 1766). In: Palomo LJ, Gisbert J (eds) Atlas de los mamiferos terrestres de Espana. Direccion General de Conservacion de la Naturaleza, SECEM-SECEMU, Madrid, pp 432–435
Otis DL, Burnham KP, White GC, Anderson DR (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:1–35
Pilats V (1994) Dormice—their present status in Latvia. Hystrix Ital J Mammal 6:185–194
Pollock KH (1982) A capture–recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. J Wildl Manag 46:752–757
Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture–recapture experiments. Wildl Monogr 107:1–97
Santini L (1983). I roditori italiani di interesse agrario e forestale. CNR, Monograph AQ/1/232, Padova
Schaub M, Vaterlaus-Schlegel C (2001) Annual and seasonal variation of survival rates in the garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus). J Zool Lond 255:89–96
Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259
Spitzenberger F (2001) Die Saugetierfauna Oesterreichs. Grune Reihe des Bundesministeriums fur Land-und Forstwirtschaft, Band 13, Graz
Vaterlaus-Schlegel C (1997) The garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus L.) in the Petite Camargue Alsacienne (nature reserve, Alsace, France). An ecological study by trapping and radiotracking. Nat Croat 6:233–241
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Summarized tables for open and closed populations model for the garden dormouse population in northern Italy
(A) Tables of recaptures
Sample i | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||||||||||
2 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||
3 | 4 | 10 | 3 | ||||||||
4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 4 | |||||||
5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5 | ||||||
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 6 | |||||
7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 7 | ||||
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 8 | |||
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 9 | ||
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 10 | |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 11 |
Z(i − 1) + 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
(B) Closed population summary
Sample number i | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animals caught N(i) | 7 | 6 | 14 | 29 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 15 |
Marked animals in population M(i) | 0 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 33 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 40 | 50 | 62 |
Newly caught animals U(i) | 7 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 12 | 2 |
Capture frequencies f(i) | 29 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Appendix 2: Summarized tables for open and closed populations model for the garden dormouse population in central Italy
(A) Tables of recaptures
Sample i | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
2 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||||
3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||||
4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ||||||||||
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |||||||||
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | ||||||||
7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | |||||||
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | ||||||
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |||||
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | ||||
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |||
12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | ||
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Z(i − 1) + 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sample i | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||||||||||
2 | |||||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||||
7 | |||||||||||||
8 | |||||||||||||
9 | |||||||||||||
10 | |||||||||||||
11 | |||||||||||||
12 | |||||||||||||
13 | |||||||||||||
14 | |||||||||||||
15 | 15 | ||||||||||||
16 | 0 | 16 | |||||||||||
17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | ||||||||||
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | |||||||||
19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | ||||||||
20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |||||||
21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | ||||||
22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | |||||
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 23 | ||||
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | |||
25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | ||
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 27 |
Z(i − 1) + 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
(B) Closed population summary
Sample number i | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animals caught N(i) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 |
Marked animals in population M(i) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 12 |
Newly caught animals U(i) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
Capture frequencies f(i) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Appendix 3: Summarized tables for open and closed populations model for the garden dormouse population in Spain
(A) Tables of recaptures
Sample i | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||||||||||
2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||
4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ||||||
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |||||
7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | ||||
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |||
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | ||
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 |
12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Z(i − 1) + 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 11 |
Sample i | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||||||||
2 | |||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||
7 | |||||||||||
8 | |||||||||||
9 | |||||||||||
10 | |||||||||||
11 | |||||||||||
12 | 12 | ||||||||||
13 | 6 | 13 | |||||||||
14 | 1 | 4 | 14 | ||||||||
15 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 15 | |||||||
16 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 16 | ||||||
17 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 17 | |||||
18 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 18 | ||||
19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 19 | |||
20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 20 | ||
21 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 21 | |
22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
32 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Z(i − 1) + 1 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Sample i | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | |||||||||||||||||||||
15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
23 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||
24 | 3 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||
25 | 0 | 1 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
26 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
29 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 29 | ||||||||||||||
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 30 | |||||||||||||
31 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 31 | ||||||||||||
32 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 32 | |||||||||||
33 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33 | ||||||||||
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 34 | |||||||||
35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 35 | ||||||||
36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 36 | |||||||
37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | ||||||
38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | |||||
39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 39 | ||||
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 40 | |||
41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 41 | ||
42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 42 | |
43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 43 |
Z(i − 1) + 1 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 13 | 10 | 3 |
(B) Closed population summary
Sample number i | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animals caught N(i) | 2 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 7 | 20 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 6 |
Marked animals in population M(i) | 0 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 36 | 36 | 53 | 57 | 58 | 65 | 74 |
Newly caught animals U(i) | 2 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 0 |
Capture frequencies f(i) | 90 | 49 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sample number i | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animals caught N(i) | 7 | 10 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
Marked animals in population M(i) | 74 | 76 | 81 | 94 | 96 | 101 | 102 | 104 | 105 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 110 | 112 |
Newly caught animals U(i) | 2 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Capture frequencies f(i) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sample number i | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animals caught N(i) | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 25 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 13 |
Marked animals in population M(i) | 113 | 113 | 113 | 113 | 117 | 122 | 125 | 128 | 134 | 153 | 154 | 157 | 158 |
Newly caught animals U(i) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
Capture frequencies f(i) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amori, G., Bertolino, S., Masciola, S. et al. Aspects of demography in three distinct populations of garden dormouse, Eliomys quercinus, across Italy and Spain. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 27, 357–368 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-015-0490-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-015-0490-6