Abstract
There has been unprecedented interest in sport-related concussions from many and varied sources including media, sports leagues, players’ unions, lawyers, legislators, scientists, clinicians, parents, coaches, and the athletes themselves. This interest has been fueled by epidemiologic data which indicate that concussions frequently occur at all ages, at all levels of play, and across a broad range of sports. The ubiquitous nature of the injury has also been coupled with concerns about whether and what type of relationships may exist between sports-related brain injury and the development of later neurodegenerative disease processes. The development of Sports Neuropsychology has largely paralleled the interest in sports concussions, making it a young and rapidly growing area of clinical and research interest. The youth of sports neuropsychology coupled with a focus on a poorly defined injury while being subject to unprecedented media, public, legislative, and legal scrutiny presents unique and important challenges to the ethical practice of sports neuropsychology. This paper explores these challenges by reviewing the brief history of sports neuropsychology, providing a basic review of the APA Code of Ethics, and discussing key ethical constructs such as beneficence, non-maleficence, and autonomy. The role of ethnic/racial cultural considerations in sports neuropsychology is discussed as well as ethical questions related to test use and development, the various roles that sports neuropsychologists play in sports medicine, and several illustrations of the challenges faced by sports neuropsychologists related to confidentiality, competence, role definition, and role boundaries. Although this article does not provide simple answers to complex questions, it does highlight areas in need of thoughtful discourse for clinicians engaged in the dynamic and evolving nature of ethical sports neuropsychology practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington: Author.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (as amended). Washington: Author.
Ardila, A. (2005). Cultural values underlying psychometric cognitive testing. Neuropsychology Review, 15, 185–195.
Bailes, J. E., Lovell, M. R., & Maroon, J.C. (1999). Sports-Related Concussion. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing.
Barth, J., Alves, W., Ryan, T., Macciocchi, S., Rimel R, Jane J, … Nelson, W. (1989). Mild head injury sports; Neuropsychological sequelae and recovery of function. In H. Levin, J. Eisenberg, & B. A., Mild Head Injury (pp. 257–275). New York: Oxford University Press
Bauer, R. M., Iverson, G. L., Cernich, A. N., Binder, L. M., Ruff, R.M., & Naugle, R. I. (2012). Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: Joint Position Paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 177–196; Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 362–373 (joint publication).
Chronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
DeMarco, A., & Barth, J. (2014). Historical perspectives of sport related concussion. In R. Echemendia & G. Iverson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sports-related Concussion (pp. 1–14). London: Oxford University Press.
Echemendia, R. J. (2004). Cultural aspects of neuropsychological evaluation in sports. In M. Lovell, R. Echemendia, J. Barth, & M. Collins (Eds.), Traumatic brain injury in sports: An international neuropsychological perspective (pp. 435–443). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Echemendia, R. J. (Ed.). (2006). Sports neuropsychology: Assessment and management of traumatic brain injury. New York: Guilford Press.
Echemendia, R. J. (2015). Presidential Address. Annual Meeting of the Sports Neuropsychology Society. Atlanta, GA
Echemendia, R. J. & Comper, P. (2009). NHL/NHLPA Neuropsychological Testing Program: Challenges and Outcomes. Presented as part of “Issues and Challenges with Rapid Neuropsychological Assessment.” University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada: December
Echemendia, R. J., Herring, S., & Bailes, J. (2009). Who should administer and interpret neuropsychological tests? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43, 32–35.
Echemendia, R., Iverson, G., McCRea, M., Broshek, D., Gioia, G., Sautter, S., … Barr, W. (2012). Role of neuropsychologists in the evaluation and management of sport-related concussion: An inter-organization position statement. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 119–122
Echemendia, R. J., Iverson, G. L., McCrea, M., Macciocch, S., Gioia, G., Putukian, M., … Comper, P. (2013). Advances in Neuropsychological Assessment. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47, 294–298
Echemendia, R. J., & Parker, E. (1998). Ethical issues in the neuropsychological assessment of athletes. In J. Bailes, M. Lovell, & J. Maroon (Eds.), Sports related concussion and nervous system injuries. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishers.
Gronwall, D., & Wrightson, P. (1974). Delayed recovery of intellectual function after minor head injury. Lancet, 2, 605–609.
Harris (UPMC) Poll (2015). How knowledgeable are Americans about concussion: Assessing and recalibrating the public’s knowledge. UPMC Harris Poll.
Iverson, G. L., & Schatz, P. (2015). Advanced topics in neuropsychological assessment following sport-related concussion. Brain Injury, 29, 263–275.
Jones, N., Walter, K., Caplinger, R., Wright, D., Rasch, W., & Young, C. (2014). Effect of education and language on baseline concussion screening tests in professional baseball players. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 24(4), 284–288.
Kirschen, M. P., Tsou, A., Nelson, S. B., Russell, J. A., & Larriviere, D. (2014). Legal and ethical implications in the evaluation and management of sports-related concussion. Neurology, 83, 352–358.
Kroshus, E., Baugh, C.M., Daneshvar, D.H., Stamm, J.M., Lauresen, R. M., & Austin, S.B. (2015). Pressure on sports medicine clinicians to prematurely return collegiate athletes to play after concussion. Journal of Athletic Training, 50, 944–951.
Langlois, J. A., Rutland-Brown, W., & Wald, M. M. (2006). The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: A brief overview. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 21(5), 375–378.
Lovell, M., Echemendia, R., Barth, J., & Collins, M. (Eds.). (2004). Traumatic brain injury in sports: An international neuropsychological perspective. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Lyall, J. (2015, October 3). Rugby world Cup 2015: Brain Expert Warns of Concussion “Anxiety”. BBC Scotland, pp. 1–2
Macciocchi, S. (2009). Doing good: The pitfalls of beneficence. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(1), 72–74.
Manly, J., & Echemendia, R. J. (2007). Race-specific norms: Using the model of hypertension to understand issues of race, culture, and education in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 319–326.
McCrory, P., Meeuwisse, W., Aubry, M., Cantu, R., Dvorak, J., Echemendia, R., … Tator, C. (2013a). Consensus statement on concussion in sport – the 4th international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2012. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47, 250–258
McCrory, P. M., Meeuwisse, W., Echemendia, R., Iverson, G., Dvořák, J., Kutcher, J. (2013b). What is the lowest threshold to make a diagnosis of concussion. 47, 268–271
McKee, A. C.-W. (2009). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: Progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury. Journal of Neuropathology Experimental Neurology, 7, 709–735.
Parker, E., & Echemendia, R. (2004). Ethical issues in the evaluation of athletes. In M. E. Lovell (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury in sports (pp. 468–477). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Partridge, B. (2014). Dazed and confused: Sports medicine, conflicts of interest, and concussion management. Bioethical Inquiry, 11, 65–74.
Sports Neuropsychology Society. (2015). Sports neuropsychology: Definition, qualifications, and training guidelines—An official position statement of the Sports Neuropsychology Society. www.sportsneuropsychologysociety.com
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2013). The principle of beneficence in Applied Ethics. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/principle-beneficence
Zillmer, E. A., Schneider, J., Tinker, J., & Kaminaris, C. I. (2006). A history of sports-related concussions: A neuropsychological perspective. In R. J. Echemendia (Ed.), Sports Neuropsychology: Assessment and Management of Traumatic Brain Injury. New York: Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Echemendia receives financial compensation for consulting services from the National Hockey League, Major League Soccer, the U.S. Soccer Federation, and Princeton University. He has also received financial compensation for services rendered as an expert witness in plaintiff and defense cases related to traumatic brain injury and sports-related concussion. He is a non-paid member of the Medical Advisory Board of BrainScope. He claims no financial conflicts of interest related to the topics discussed in this article. Dr. Bauer receives research support from the Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Veterans HealthCare Administration (1I21RX001730-01), from the Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1TR001427) and from the National Institute on Aging (1P50AG047266-01A1). He claims no financial conflicts of interest related to the topics discussed in this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Echemendia, R.J., Bauer, R.M. Professional Ethics in Sports Neuropsychology. Psychol. Inj. and Law 8, 289–299 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9241-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9241-3