Abstract
The use of cutoff scores on symptom validity measures has been applied to determine the authenticity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs compensation and pension examinations. This approach is controversial due to variations in the interpretation and application of cutoff scores from symptom validity testing. In response to the proposal that the cutoff score on the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (MENT) be increased, the diagnostic accuracy of the standard cutting score for identifying simulated symptoms of PTSD was compared to the proposed alternate cutoff score. The results of decision matrix tables (true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative) comparing the sensitivity and specificity and deriving confidence intervals for the standard cutoff score and proposed alternate cutoff score are presented. In addition, analyses using binomial probability theory to determine whether the outcome of increasing the cutoff score on the MENT meets reasonable standards for types I and II errors are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Association, A. P. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Arbisi, P. A., Murdoch, M., Fortier, L., & McNulty, J. (2004). MMPI-2 validity and award of service connection for PTSD during the VA compensation and pension evaluation. Psychological Services, 1(1), 56–67.
Bianchini, K. J., Greve, K. W., & Love, J. M. (2003). Definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in moderate/severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(4), 574–580.
Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., ... Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. National Academy of Neuropsychology Policy and Planning Committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419–426.
Fox, D. D. (2011). Symptom validity test failure indicates invalidity of neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(3), 488–495.
Green, P. (2001). Why clinicians often disagree about the validity of test results. Neuro Rehabilitation, 16, 231–236.
Green, P. (2007). Spoiled for choice: Making comparisons between forced choice effort tests. In K. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 50–77). New York: The Guilford Press.
Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Ameduri, C. J. (2003). The use of a forced choice test of tactile discrimination in the evaluation of functional sensory loss: A report of 3 cases. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(8), 1233–1236.
Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Conference Participants. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129.
Howe, L. L. (2012). Distinguishing genuine from malingered posttraumatic stress disorder in head injury litigation. In C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 301–330). New York: Springer.
Iverson, G. L. (2003). Detecting malingering in civil forensic evaluations. In A. M. Horton Jr. & L. C. Hartlage (Eds.), Handbook of forensic neuropsychology (pp. 137–177). New York: Springer.
Iverson, G. L. (2006). Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering. Applied Neuropsychology, 13(2), 77–90.
Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 1–7.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.
Morel, K. R. (1995). Use of the binomial theorem in detecting fictitious posttraumatic stress disorder. Anxiety Disorders Practice Journal, 2(1), 55–62.
Morel, K. R. (1998). Development and preliminary validation of a forced-choice test of response bias for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 299–314.
Morel, K. R. (2008). Development of a validity scale for posttraumatic stress disorder: Evidence from simulated malingerers and actual disability claimants. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 19(1), 52–63.
Morel, K. R. (2012). Manual for the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Psychometric Properties. (3rd ed. rev.). Las Vegas, NV: Author.
Morel, K. R., & Shepherd, B. E. (2008). Developing a symptom validity test for posttraumatic stress disorder: Application of the binomial distribution. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(8), 1297–1302.
Orme, D. R. (2012). Diagnosing PTSD: Lessons from neuropsychology. Military Psychology, 24(4), 397–413.
Resnick, P. J., & Knoll, J. (2005). Faking it: How to detect malingered psychosis. Journal of Family Practice, 4(11), 13–25. Retrieved from http://www.jfponline.com/Pages.asp?AID=2821#bib2
Rubenzer, S. (2009). Posttraumatic stress disorder: Assessing response style and malingering. Psychological Injury and Law, 2, 114–142.
Singh, G. (2007). Determination of cutoff score for a diagnostic test. The Internet Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2(1).
Wiedmaier, P. (2011). Normative data for three symptom validity tests: The Morel Emotional Numbing Test (MENT), the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) and the List of Improbable Problems (LIMP). [Schätzung von Normalbefunden fur drei Beschwerden validierungstests: Der Morel Emotional Numbing Test (MENT), der Strukturierte Fragebogen Simulierter Symptome (SFSS) und die List of Improbable Problems (LIMP)]. Germany: Dr. Müller.
Williams, J. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Factitious responding and malingered memory disorder. In C. Reynolds (Ed.), The detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Plenum.
Worthen, M. D., & Moering, R. G. (2011). A practical guide to conducting VA compensation and pension exams for PTSD and other mental disorders. Psychological Injury and Law, 4(3–4), 187–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author Note
The recommendations, opinions, or views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy, opinions, or beliefs of the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the Government of the United States of America. The author developed and owns the proprietary rights to the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (MENT).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morel, K.R. Cutoff Scores for the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for PTSD: Considerations for Use in VA Mental Health Examinations. Psychol. Inj. and Law 6, 138–143 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9151-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9151-1