Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of the sheet/cloud cavitation around a two-dimensional hydrofoil using a modified URANS approach

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cavitating flow over a two-dimensional Clark-Y hydrofoil is numerically investigated via a Modified density correction method (MDCM) for turbulence closure to improve the capability of two-phase flow simulation for the k-ε RNG turbulence model. A transport equation model for the local volume fraction of vapor is solved, and a modified version of the Kunz model is used for the condensation and evaporation processes. Simulations have been conducted for various cavitation numbers ranging from non-cavitating to cloud cavitation. We compared the time-averaged lift and drag coefficients, cavitation dynamics, and time-averaged velocity profiles with the available experimental data for the MDCM and Density correction method (DCM). The comparisons between numerical and experimental results show that the MDCM and DCM are capable of capturing the special trends of the lift coefficient at the inception cavitation stage and the drag coefficient at the cloud cavitation stage. The MDCM is more robust and physical than the DCM in predicting the wake flow downstream from the trailing edge. The predicted attached cavities of both models almost show the same trend near the leading edge of the hydrofoil. However, the MDCM predicts more shedding cavity than the DCM in the wake region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. E. Brennen, Cavitation and bubble dynamics, Cambridge University Press (2014).

  2. T. R. Chen, B. Huang, G. Y. Wang and K. Wang, Effects of fluid thermophysical properties on cavitating flows, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29 (10) (2015) 4239–4246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. P. Wei, S. Fu, Q. Wu, B. Huang and G. Y. Wang, Experimental and numerical research on cavitating flows around axisymmetric bodies, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 28 (11) (2014) 4527–4537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Y. Wu, G. Y. Wang and W. Shyy, Time-dependent turbulent cavitating flow computations with interfacial transport and filter-based models, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 49 (7) (2005) 739–761.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Kubota, H. Kato and H. Yamaguchi, A new modeling of cavitating flows: A numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section, Journal of fluid Mechanics, 240 (1) (1992) 59–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Delannoy and J. L. Kueny, Cavity flow predictions based on the Euler equations, ASME Cavitation and Multi-Phase Flow Forum, 109 (1990) 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. Coutier-Delgosha, J. L. Reboud and Y. Delannoy, Numerical simulation of the unsteady behaviour of cavitating flows, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 42 (5) (2003) 527–548.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Kubota, H. Kato and H. Yamaguchi, Unsteady structure measurement of cloud cavitation on a foil section using conditional sampling technique, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 111 (2) (1989) 204–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. K. Singhal, M. M. Athavale, H. Li and Y. Jiang, Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124 (3) (2002) 617–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. L. Merkle, J. Z. Feng and P. E. O. Buelow, Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France (1998).

  11. R. F. Kunz, D. A. Boger, D. R. Stinebring, T. S. Chyczewski, J. W. Lindau, H. J. Gibeling, S. Venkateswaran and T. R. Govindan, A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction, Computers & Fluids, 29 (8) (2000) 849–875.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Senocak and W. Shyy, A pressure-based method for turbulent cavitating flow computations, Journal of Computational Physics, 176 (2) (2002) 363–383.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. J. L. Reboud, B. Stutz and O. Coutier-Delgosha, Two phase flow structure of cavitation: Experiment and modeling of unsteady effects, Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France (1998).

  14. O. Coutier-Delgosha, R. Fortes-Patella and J. L. Reboud, Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 125 (1) (2001) 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. R. Spalart, Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 21 (3) (2000) 252–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Wu, W. Shyy and S. T. Johansen, Filter-based unsteady RANS computations for single-phase and cavitating flows, ASME 2004 Heat Transfer/Fluids Engineering Summer Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 3 (2004) 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. S. Girimaji, Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model for turbulence: A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to direct numerical simulation bridging method, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 73 (3) (2006) 413–421.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Huang, Y. L. Ying, G. Wang and W. Shyy, Combined experimental and computational investigation of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 135 (7) (2013) 071301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Kim and J. Lee, Numerical study of cloud cavitation effects on hydrophobic hydrofoils, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 83 (2015) 591–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. H. Seo and S. K. Lele, Numerical investigation of cloud cavitation and cavitation noise on a hydrofoil section, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation CAV, August, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

  21. A. Ducoin, B. Huang and L. Y. Yin, Numerical modeling of unsteady cavitating flows a round a stationary hydrofoil, International Journal of Rotating Machinery (2012) 215678.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. T. Johansen, J. Y. Wu and W. Shyy, Filter-based unsteady RANS computations, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 25 (1) (2004) 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ANSYS FLUENT, ANSYS Fluent 14.5 Documentation.

  24. N. Ochiai, Y. Iga, M. Nohmi and T. Ikohagi, Numerical prediction of cavitation erosion intensity in cavitating flows around a Clark Y 11.7% hydrofoil, Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, 5 (3) (2010) 416–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Wang, I. Senocak, W. Shyy, T. Ikohagi and S. L. Cao, Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 37 (6) (2001) 551–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. L. Hu, G. Y. Wang, G. H. Chen and B. Huang, A modified PANS model for computations of unsteady turbulence cavitating flows, Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy, 57 (10) (2014) 1967–1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B. Huang, G. Y. Wang, Z. Y. Yu and S. G. Shi, Detachededdy simulation for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flows, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 25 (3) (2012) 484–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Li.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Shin Hyung Rhee

Zhong Li was born in 1979 in China. He is currently an Associate Professor at the School of Energy and Power Engineering of Jiangsu University. His main research interests are multiphase flow within pumps and optimal design of fluid machineries.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Zheng, D., Hong, F. et al. Numerical simulation of the sheet/cloud cavitation around a two-dimensional hydrofoil using a modified URANS approach. J Mech Sci Technol 31, 215–224 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1224-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1224-0

Keywords

Navigation