Abstract
The concept of connecting two adjacent buildings has been effectively used to mitigate the structural responses of such buildings due to strong ground motions. Lots of analytical and experimental studies have shown the efficiency of this conventional strategy for dissimilar coupled buildings. However, it is absolutely inefficient for the similar connected buildings. The authors, in their previous works, have provided a new Hybrid Coupled Building Control method (HCBC method) which is applicable to all adjacent buildings. This control strategy reduces the structural responses, and thus reduces the internal forces, of the connected buildings more efficiently than the conventional Coupled Building Control method. In order to apply this strategy, one of the buildings is equipped with a base isolation system, and an active actuator link connects the upper floor of the shorter building to its corresponding floor of the other building. In this paper, the HCBC method is developed for the similar coupled buildings. Herein, this structural control method is applied to two similar connected moment-resisting frame buildings. The best performance of the system is obtained, by designing the control system, so that the two connected buildings stay within their elastic range due to the ground motions. The performances of the HCBC models using active and passive strategies are also compared in details.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers.
Chen, X. W. and Han, X. L. (2010). “Research summery on long-span connected tall building structure with viscous dampers.” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 439–456, DOI: 10.1002/tal.582.
Cheng, F. Y., Jiang, H., and Lou, K. (2008). Smart structures; Innovative systems for seismic response control, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, ISBN 978-0-8493-8532-2, US, pp. 174–191.
Christenson, R. E., Hori, N., Spencer, B. F., and Seto, K. (2003). “Coupled building control using acceleration feedback.” Computer Aided Civil Infrastructures. Eng., Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 3–17, DOI: 10. 1111/1467-8667.00295.
Christenson, R. E., Makita, K., Seto, K., and Watanabe, T. (2007). “Optimal design strategy of connected control method for two dynamically similar structures.” J. Struct. Eng. Mech., ASCE, pp. 1247–1257, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007) 133:12(1247).
Christenson, R. E. and Spencer, B. F. (1999). “Coupled building control using smart dampers.” Proc., 13th Engineering Mechanics Division Conf., (CD-R), Baltimore ASCE, Reston, Va.
Christenson, R. E., Spencer, B. F., Johnson, E. A., and Seto, K. (2006). “Coupled building control considering the effects of building/connector configuration.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 132, No. 6, pp. 853–863, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:6(853).
Fathi, F. and Bahar, O. (2011). “Hybrid coupled building control.” Proc., 6th International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (SEE6), Tehran, Iran.
Fathi, F. and Bahar, O. (2012). “Hybrid coupled building control (hcbc), the effects of actuator position.” Journal of Seismology & Earthquake Engineering (JSEE), Vol 14, No 2, pp. 145–159, Tehran, Iran.
Fukuda, Y., Matsumoto, Y., and Seto, K. (1996). “Bending and torsional vibration control of flexible structures arranged in parallel.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Motion and Vibration Control (MOVIC), Vol. 3, Chiba, Japan.
Gurley, K., Kareem, A., Bergman, L. A., Johnson, E. A., and Klein, R. E. (1994). “Coupling tall buildings for control of response to wind.” Proc., Sixth Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR) AA Balkema Publishers, Rotherdam, pp. 1553–1560.
Kamagata, K., Miyajima, K., and Seto, K. (1996). “Optimal design of damping devices for vibration control of parallel structures.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Motion and Vibration Control (MOVIC), Vol. 2, Chiba, Japan, pp. 334–339.
Klein, R. E., Cusano, C., and Stukel, J. J. (1972). “Investigation of a method to stabilize wind-induced oscillations in large structures.” Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 53–53.
Ko, J. M., Ni, Y. Q., and Ying, Z. G. (1999). “Dynamic response of adjacent buildings coupled with nonlinear hysteretic dampers under random seismic excitation.” Proc., Seminar on New Seismic Design Methodologies for Tall Buildings, Beijing, pp. 111–122.
Luco, J. E. and De Barros, C. P. (1998). “Optimal damping between two adjacent elastic structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 27, pp. 649–659, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199807)27:7 <649::AIDEQE748>3.0.CO;2-5.
Luco, J. E. and Wong, H. L. (1994). “Control of the seismic response of adjacent structures.” Proc., 1st World Conf. on Structural Control, Pasadena, Calif., Vol. 2, pp. 21–30.
MATLAB (2009). The language of technical computing, MATLAB release R2009a, The Math Works, 2009.
Motra, G. B., Mallik, W., and Chandiramani, N. K. (2011). “Semi-active vibration control of connected buildings using magnetorheological dampers.” Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 22, No. 16, pp. 1811–1827, DOI: 10.1177/1045389X11412640.
Sakai, D., Sugino, S., Seto, K., Christenson, R. E., and Spencer, B. F. (1999). “Vibration control of parallel structures connected with passive devices designed by GA.” Proc., DETC-99, 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf, Las Vegas.
Seto, K. (1994). “Vibration control method for flexible structures arranged in parallel.” Proc., 1st World Conference on Structural Control, Vol. 2, pp. 62–71.
Seto, K. (1996). “A structural control method of the vibration of flexible buildings in response to large earthquakes and strong winds.” Proc., 35th IEEE Conference on Decision Control, Kobe, Japan, Vol. 1, pp. 658–663.
Tesfamariam, S., Hare, W., and Bigdeli, K. (2012). “Configuration optimization of dampers for adjacent buildings under seismic excitations.” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 44, Issue 12, pp. 1491–1509, DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2012.654788.
Tubaldi, E. (2015). “Dynamic behavior of adjacent buildings connected by linear viscous/viscoelastic dampers.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 22, Issue 8, pp. 1086–1102, DOI: 10.1002/stc.1734.
Uz, M. E. and Hadi, N. S. (2014). “Optimal design of semi active control for adjacent buildings connected by MR damper based on integrated fuzzy logic and multi-objective genetic algorithm.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 69, 15 June 2014, pp. 135–148, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.006.
Xu, Y. L., He, Q., and Ko, J. M. (1999). “Dynamic response of damperconnected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 135–148, DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00154-5.
Xuebo, Y., Wei, Z., and Karimi, H. R. (2012). “Actuators and sensors allocation for adjacent buildings vibration control.” Proc., 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society., (IECON 2012), Montreal, QC, pp. 4821–4826, DOI: 10.1109/IECON.2012.6388998.
Yoshida, K., Saigo, M., and Seto, K. (2002). “Vibration control of parallel flexible structures with identical vibration property uesing interactive force.” Proc., International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 967–972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fathi, F., Bahar, O. Hybrid Coupled Building Control for similar adjacent buildings. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 265–273 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0708-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0708-x